Erythropoietin (EPO)+/- Filgrastim (G-CSF) vs. Supportive Therapy Alone for Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Phase III Evaluation of EPO With or Without G-CSF Versus Supportive Therapy Alone in the Treatment of Myelodysplastic Syndromes

RATIONALE: Erythropoietin and colony-stimulating factors such as filgrastim stimulate the production of blood cells. It is not yet known whether erythropoietin with or without filgrastim is more effective than standard blood transfusions in reducing the need for transfusions in patients who have anemia associated with myelodysplastic syndrome.

PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of erythropoietin with or without filgrastim with that of standard blood transfusions in reducing the need for transfusions in patients who have anemia associated with myelodysplastic syndrome.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Myelodysplastic Syndromes; Anemia
• Intervention / Treatment: Procedure: Transfusion; Biological: Erythropoietin; Biological: Filgrastim

Detailed Description

OBJECTIVES:

• Compare the benefit of erythropoietin vs standard transfusion support in reducing transfusion requirements in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes.
• Compare the clinical response, disease progression, and survival in patients treated with these regimens.
• Compare the toxicity of these regimens in these patients.
• Evaluate whether adding filgrastim (G-CSF) or increasing the erythropoietin dose will reduce the transfusion requirement in patients who do not respond to erythropoietin alone.
• To compare the benefit of erythropoietin versus supportive care alone on quality of life (QOL) in persons with myelodysplastic syndromes.

OUTLINE: This is a randomized, controlled, multicenter, cross-over study. Patients are stratified according to morphologic subtype (refractory anemia [RA] vs RA with ringed sideroblasts vs RA with excess blasts), transfusion requirement (yes vs no), prior erythropoietin treatment (yes vs no), and erythropoietin level (at least 200 mU/mL vs less than 200 mU/mL). Patients are randomized to one of two treatment arms.

• Arm I (standard transfusion support): Patients receive red cell and platelet transfusions for symptoms or to maintain hematocrit level of 25% or above. Patients undergo bone marrow aspirate and biopsy at 4 months and then every year until development of acute leukemia or completion of study. Patients with progressive disease may cross over to arm II after at least 4 months on study and up to 1 year from the time of randomization. Patients who cross over receive erythropoietin alone.
• Arm II (Erythropoietin): Patients receive erythropoietin subcutaneously (SC) or intravenously (IV) daily. Patients undergo bone marrow aspirate and biopsy as in arm I. Treatment continues daily for a maximum of 1 year.

Patients with stable or progressive disease at day 120 receive filgrastim (G-CSF) SC daily or 3 days a week and erythropoietin SC daily for up to 6 months. Patients with no response to G-CSF and lower-dose erythropoietin may proceed to a higher dose of erythropoietin.

Quality of life is assessed at baseline, every 4 months during study, and at study completion.

Patients are followed every 4 months for 2 years, every 6 months for 3 years, and then annually for 5 years.

ACTUAL ACCRUAL: A total of 118 patients were accrued for this study.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 118
• Phase: Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• United States
  • Colorado
    • Denver, Colorado, United States, 80224
      • CCOP - Colorado Cancer Research Program, Incorporated
  • Illinois
    • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
      • Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center at Northwestern University
    • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611-4494
      • Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Lakeside Chicago
    • Peoria, Illinois, United States, 61602
      • CCOP - Illinois Oncology Research Association
    • Urbana, Illinois, United States, 61801
      • CCOP - Carle Cancer Center
  • Iowa
    • Cedar Rapids, Iowa, United States, 52403-1206
      • CCOP - Cedar Rapids Oncology Project
    • Des Moines, Iowa, United States, 50309-1016
      • CCOP - Iowa Oncology Research Association
  • Louisiana
    • New Orleans, Louisiana, United States, 70112
      • MBCCOP - LSU Health Sciences Center
  • Massachusetts
    • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02111
      • TUFTS - New England Medical Center
  • Michigan
    • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48106
      • CCOP - Michigan Cancer Research Consortium
    • Kalamazoo, Michigan, United States, 49007
      • West Michigan Cancer Center
    • Kalamazoo, Michigan, United States, 49007-3731
      • CCOP - Kalamazoo
  • Minnesota
    • Saint Louis Park, Minnesota, United States, 55416
      • CCOP - Metro-Minnesota
  • Nebraska
    • Omaha, Nebraska, United States, 68106
      • CCOP - Missouri Valley Cancer Consortium
  • Nevada
    • Las Vegas, Nevada, United States, 89106
      • CCOP - Southern Nevada Cancer Research Foundation
  • New Jersey
    • East Orange, New Jersey, United States, 07019
      • Veterans Affairs Medical Center - East Orange
    • Hackensack, New Jersey, United States, 07601
      • CCOP - Northern New Jersey
    • New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States, 08903
      • Cancer Institute of New Jersey
  • New York
    • New York, New York, United States, 10016
      • NYU School of Medicine's Kaplan Comprehensive Cancer Center
  • North Dakota
    • Fargo, North Dakota, United States, 58122
      • CCOP - Merit Care Hospital
  • Ohio
    • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44109
      • MetroHealth's Cancer Care Center at MetroHealth Medical Center
    • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43206
      • CCOP - Columbus
  • Pennsylvania
    • Danville, Pennsylvania, United States, 17822-2001
      • CCOP - Geisinger Clinic and Medical Center
  • South Dakota
    • Sioux Falls, South Dakota, United States, 57104
      • CCOP - Sioux Community Cancer Consortium
  • Texas
    • Temple, Texas, United States, 76508
      • CCOP - Scott and White Hospital
  • Wisconsin
    • Green Bay, Wisconsin, United States, 54307-3453
      • CCOP - St. Vincent Hospital Cancer Center, Green Bay
    • Marshfield, Wisconsin, United States, 54449
      • CCOP - Marshfield Clinic Research Foundation
    • Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States, 53226-3596
      • Medical College of Wisconsin Cancer Center

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• At least 18 years of age
• Diagnosis of a myelodysplastic syndrome
• Refractory anemia (RA)
• RA with ringed sideroblasts
• RA with excess blasts (RAEB). RAEB patients must have a bone marrow blast count of less than 20% and less than 5% blast forms on peripheral blood
• Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status of 0 to 3
• Platelet count greater than 30,000/mm^3 (without platelet transfusions)
• Hematocrit less than 30% (pretransfusion)
• Bilirubin less than 3 mg/dL
• Blood urea nitrogen (BUN) less than 40 mg/dL or Creatinine less than 2.0 mg/dL
• Prior epoetin alfa allowed provided dosage was less than 30,000 units per week for less than 1 month duration
• At least 1 month since prior erythropoietin
• At least 2 months since prior recombinant growth factor
• At least 2 months since prior chemotherapy for other malignancy or autoimmune disease
• At least 2 weeks since prior androgen or steroids for treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes

Exclusion Criteria:

• RAEB in transformation
• Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia
• Splenomegaly greater than 6 cm below the left costal margin or greater than 3 times normal size
• Uncontrolled hypertension
• Sensitivity to E. coli-derived proteins
• Sensitivity to epoetin alfa or any of its components (e.g., human albumin)
• Documented iron deficiency. If marrow iron stain is not available, the transferrin saturation must be greater than 20% or ferritin greater than 100 ng/dL
• Active infection or bleeding
• Other uncontrolled malignancy
• Pregnant or nursing. Fertile patients must use effective contraception.

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: None (Open Label)

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Supportive Care; Patients received red cell and platelet transfusions for symptoms or to maintain hematocrit at or above 25% by volume. Patients who required transfusion support for symptomatic anemia prior to entering the study and who developed an increase in their transfusion requirement of >= 50% shall cross over to the Erythropoietin treatment arm, after at least four months on the supportive therapy arm.	Procedure: Transfusion; Red cell and platelet transfusions
Experimental: Erythropoietin; Erythropoietin was administered at 150 units/kg subcutaneously every day. If patients stopped responding, they were subsequently treated with Erythropoietin (150 units/kg) and filgrastim and then Erythropoietin (300 units/kg) and filgrastim.	Biological: Erythropoietin; Administered at 150 units/kg subcutaneously every day. Rotating sites should be used. The dose should be rounded off to the nearest 1000 U. The dose should be adjusted based on hematocrit.; Other Names: EPO; r-HuEPO; Biological: Filgrastim; G-CSF should start at a dose of 1 mcg/kg per day or 2.5 mcg/kg three times a week subcutaneously. Rotating sites should be used The dose should be rounded off to the nearest 10 mcg.; Other Names: G-CSF; Neupogen; r-methHuG-CSF; Recombinant-methionyl human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Proportion of Patients Free of Transfusion at 4 Months	Whether a patient required transfusion or not at 4 months was recorded.	Assessed at 4 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Overall Survival	Time from randomization to death from any cause. Patients alive at the time of analysis were censored at the date of last contact.	Assessed every 3 months for 2 years, every 6 months for 3 subsequent years, and annually thereafter
Quality of Life- Total Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G) Score at 4 Months	The FACT-G scale has 4 dimensions, including physical well-being, social/family well-being, emotional well-being, and functional well-being. The score for each subscale was added together to obtain the total FACT-G score that was evaluated on this study. The total FACT-G score ranges from 0 to 108 with higher scores reflecting better quality of life. It was administered at the time of study entry, every 4 months for the first year, and at the time patient went off treatment. Due to limited data after 4 months on treatment, the analysis was restricted to the four-month time point.	Assessed at 4 months

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group
• Collaborators: National Cancer Institute (NCI)
• Investigators: Study Chair: Kenneth B. Miller, MD, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

Publications and helpful links

General Publications

• Greenberg PL, Sun Z, Miller KB, Bennett JM, Tallman MS, Dewald G, Paietta E, van der Jagt R, Houston J, Thomas ML, Cella D, Rowe JM. Treatment of myelodysplastic syndrome patients with erythropoietin with or without granulocyte colony-stimulating factor: results of a prospective randomized phase 3 trial by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (E1996). Blood. 2009 Sep 17;114(12):2393-400. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-03-211797. Epub 2009 Jun 29.
• Miller KB, Kim HT, Greenberg P, et al.: Phase III prospective randomized trial of EPO with or without G-CSF versus supportive therapy alone in the treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS): results of the ECOG- CLSG trial (E1996). [Abstract] Blood 104 (11): A-70, 2004.
• Cherry AM, Brockman SR, Paternoster SF, Hicks GA, Neuberg D, Higgins RR, Bennett JM, Greenberg PL, Miller K, Tallman MS, Rowe J, Dewald GW. Comparison of interphase FISH and metaphase cytogenetics to study myelodysplastic syndrome: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) study. Leuk Res. 2003 Dec;27(12):1085-90. doi: 10.1016/s0145-2126(03)00104-8.

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): March 4, 1998
• Primary Completion (Actual): August 1, 2008
• Study Completion (Actual): May 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: November 1, 1999
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: January 26, 2003
• First Posted (Estimated): January 27, 2003

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): June 29, 2023
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: June 14, 2023
• Last Verified: June 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: anemia; refractory anemia; erythropoietin; filgrastim; myelodysplastic syndromes
• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Pathologic Processes; Neoplasms; Disease; Bone Marrow Diseases; Hematologic Diseases; Precancerous Conditions; Syndrome; Myelodysplastic Syndromes; Preleukemia; Anemia; Physiological Effects of Drugs; Immunologic Factors; Adjuvants, Immunologic; Hematinics; Lenograstim; Epoetin Alfa
• Other Study ID Numbers: CDR0000065907; U10CA021115 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract); E1996 (Other Identifier: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG))