Prognostic Significance of T Wave Alternans
The Prevalence and Prognostic Significance of T Wave Alternans in Patients With Severe Congestive Heart Failture
To evaluate whether T Wave Alternans can predict ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death (SCD) in a prospective epidemiologic natural history study.
The prospective epidemiologic pilot study included 550 patients that had left ventricular dysfunction and no history of sustained ventricular arrhythmias. The primary hypothesis tested was whether there was an increased risk of having an arrhythmic event when T Wave Alternans was present in the patient. The secondary aims included comparing risk due to T Wave Alternans between the ischemic patients and non-ischemic patients and assessing whether T Wave Alternans remained an independent predictor of risk upon adjustment for other known risk factors for arrhythmic events such as ejection fraction, ventricular ectopy, NSVT, average NN interval, and RR interval variability.
The study approach was a standard epidemiologic surveillance technique. The subject population consisted of individuals with Class I to III heart failure who will underwent a TWA and Holter monitor test and then were followed for up to two years or until arrhythmic events occured.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Sudden cardiac death accounts for approximately 400,000 deaths each year in the United States and remains a health problem of epidemic proportions. Most sudden cardiac deaths are caused by fatal ventricular arrhythmias. An effort aimed at the primary prevention of sudden cardiac death requires efficient identification of patients who are at high enough risk for having these arrhythmias to warrant aggressive prophylactic therapy. A number of recently completed, randomized clinical trials have demonstrated that an implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) can prevent sudden cardiac death in a highly selected group of high-risk patients. When these trials are viewed together, the only patients in whom the prophylactic implantation of an ICD has proven benefit are those patients identified by documented, spontaneous or inducible, sustained ventricular arrhythmias.
Two randomized treatment trials (MADIT II, SCD-HEFT) tested the hypothesis that implantation of an ICD would reduce mortality in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) and left ventricular dysfunction without any further risk tratification. However, the implications of these two trials-implantation of an ICD in every patient with CHF-were unlikely to be accepted either by the medical community or by health care payers. More efficient methods of risk stratification were necessary to identify those patients with CHF who were most likely to benefit from prophylactic treatment with an ICD.
T Wave Alternans is a subtle every-other-beat variation in electrocardiographic T waves that is prognostic of patients at high risk for life-threatening cardiac arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death. It has recently been shown that T Wave Alternans (TWA) measured during exercise is strongly associated with inducible monomorphic CVT and with subsequent spontaneous arrhythmic events. This preliminary data suggest that TWA may be an efficient and non-invasive surrogate for electrophysiologic testing to screen patients who may be at high-risk for sudden cardiac death.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
New York
-
New York, New York, United States, 10023
- Columbia University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria
- Patients with left ventricular dusfunction
- Patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy
Exclusion Criteria
1. Patients not at high risk for sudden cardiac death (SCD)
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
ECG recording
After the tests are completed, people who enroll in this study are followed by telephone, 1, 4, 8, 12 16, 20 and 24 months.
During these follow-up telephone calls a research coordinator asks about the participant's health condition and about cardiovascular medications that are being taken.
|
A diagnostic tool that is routinely used to assess the electrical and muscular functions of the heart (non-experimental).
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Pevalence of SCD with earlier testing that indicated TWA
Time Frame: Up to 24 months
|
Up to 24 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: John Bigger, Professor Emeritus of Medicine and Pharmacology, Columbia University
- Principal Investigator: John Bigger, Columbia University
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- AAAB1399
- R01HL064862 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.