A Randomised Single Centre Study to Compare the Long-term Performance of Acryloc™ and Palacos® R Bone Cements in Primary Total Hip Replacement

March 27, 2017 updated by: DePuy International

Randomised, Prospective, RSA, PMS Study Comparing Acryloc™ & Palacos R in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty

The purpose of this study is to monitor the stability of a total hip replacement within the thigh bone when used in artificial hip joints implanted with two different bone cements, Acryloc™ and Palacos® R, in the treatment of patients with hip joint disease requiring a total hip replacement. Patients who enter the study will be randomly allocated to Acryloc™ or Palacos® R and will be evaluated at regular intervals following hip surgery using patient, clinical, x-ray assessments and special x-rays which allow the stability of the hip implant to be determined

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

36

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Sor-Trondelag
      • Trondheim, Sor-Trondelag, Norway
        • University Hospital of Trondheim

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

60 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

i) Male or female subjects, aged 60 to 75 years (inclusive), and with a weight of less than 100kg.

ii) Subjects who are able to give voluntary, written informed consent to participate in this investigation and from whom consent has been obtained.

iii) Subjects who, in the opinion of the Investigator, are able to understand this investigation, co-operate with the investigational procedures and are willing to return to the hospital for all the required post-operative follow-ups.

iv) Subjects with non-inflammatory arthritis of the hip.

v) Subjects who require a primary total hip arthroplasty and are treated at the arthroplasty section of the orthopaedics department at the Investigational Centre.

vi) Subjects who are considered suitable for a cemented femoral stem and cemented acetabular component.

Exclusion Criteria:

i) Subjects who, in the opinion of the Investigator, have an existing condition such as malignancy, severe osteoporosis, disabling musculo-skeletal problems (other than in the hips) or any other condition that would compromise their participation and follow-up in this study.

ii) Women who are pregnant.

iii) Subjects who are known drug or alcohol abusers or with psychological disorders that could effect follow-up care or treatment outcomes.

iv) Subjects who have participated in a clinical study with an investigational product in the last 6 month(s).

v) Subjects who are currently involved in any injury litigation claims.

vi) Subjects undergoing corticosteroid treatment.

vii) Subjects with any condition for whom the use of conventional bone cement is contra-indicated.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: 1
Acryloc™ GHV
A high viscosity bone cement for use in total hip replacement
Active Comparator: 2
Palacos R
A high viscosity bone cement for use in total hip replacement

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Distal migration of the femoral prosthesis from the time of implantation to the 2 year follow-up assessment
Time Frame: 2 Year
2 Year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Annual posterior (AP) and medio-lateral (ML) RSA translations
Time Frame: Annually
Annually
Merle D'Aubigne score
Time Frame: Annually
Annually
Radiographic analysis
Time Frame: Annually
Annually
Kaplan-Meier Survivorship - Revision of any component for any reason
Time Frame: Throughout Study
Throughout Study

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2002

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2005

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2005

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 13, 2005

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 13, 2005

First Posted (Estimate)

September 21, 2005

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 28, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 27, 2017

Last Verified

March 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Osteoarthritis

Clinical Trials on Acryloc™ GHV

3
Subscribe