PRIME: Panitumumab Randomized Trial In Combination With Chemotherapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer to Determine Efficacy

November 3, 2022 updated by: Amgen

A Randomized, Multicenter, Phase 3 Study to Compare the Efficacy of Panitumumab in Combination With Oxaliplatin/ 5-fluorouracil/ Leucovorin to the Efficacy of Oxaliplatin/ 5-fluorouracil/ Leucovorin Alone in Patients With Previously Untreated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

The purpose of this study is to determine the treatment effect of panitumumab in combination with FOLFOX compared to FOLFOX alone as first line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1183

Phase

  • Phase 3

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Man or woman at least 18 years old
  • Diagnosis of metastatic colorectal cancer
  • At least 1 uni-dimensionally measurable lesion of at least 20 mm per modified RECIST
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0, 1, or 2
  • Paraffin-embedded tumor tissue from the primary tumor or metastasis available for central analyse Exclusion Criteria:
  • History or known presence of central nervous system (CNS) metastases
  • History of another primary cancer, except: Curatively treated in situ cervical cancer, or Curatively resected non-melanoma skin cancer, or Other primary solid tumor curatively treated with no known active disease present and no treatment administered for ≥ 5 years before randomization
  • Prior chemotherapy or systemic therapy for the treatment of metastatic colorectal carcinoma except: adjuvant fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy or prior fluoropyrimidine therapy administered solely for the purpose of radiosensitization
  • Prior oxaliplatin therapy
  • Prior anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFr) antibody therapy (eg, cetuximab) or treatment with small molecule EGFr inhibitors (eg, erlotinib)
  • Clinically significant cardiovascular disease (including myocardial infarction, unstable angina, symptomatic congestive heart failure, serious uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmia) 1 year prior to randomization History of interstitial lung disease (eg, pneumonitis or pulmonary fibrosis) or evidence of interstitial lung disease on baseline chest computed tomography (CT) scan
  • Active inflammatory bowel disease or other bowel disease causing chronic diarrhea (defined as > Common terminology criteria (CTC) grade 2 [CTCAE version 3.0])
  • Peripheral sensory neuropathy with functional impairment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: FOLFOX + Panitumumab
Participants received panitumumab, 6 mg/kg on Day 1 and FOLFOX chemotherapy regimen on Days 1 and 2 of each 14-day cycle until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Panitumumab 6 mg/kg over on Day 1 of each 14-day cycle, just prior to the administration of chemotherapy.
Other Names:
  • Vectibix®
The FOLFOX regimen consisted of oxaliplatin 85 mg/m^2 intravenous (IV) infusion on Day 1, leucovorin, 200 mg/m^2 (racemate) on Days 1 and 2 and 5-fluorouracil 400 mg/m^2 IV bolus followed by 600 mg/m^2 IV infusion over 22 hours on Days 1 and 2. Each cycle was 14 days.
Active Comparator: FOLFOX
Participants received FOLFOX chemotherapy regimen on Days 1 and 2 of each 14-day cycle until disease progression or until unacceptable toxicity.
The FOLFOX regimen consisted of oxaliplatin 85 mg/m^2 intravenous (IV) infusion on Day 1, leucovorin, 200 mg/m^2 (racemate) on Days 1 and 2 and 5-fluorouracil 400 mg/m^2 IV bolus followed by 600 mg/m^2 IV infusion over 22 hours on Days 1 and 2. Each cycle was 14 days.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Progression-free Survival
Time Frame: From randomization until the data cutoff date of 30 September 2008. Maximum follow-up time was 109 weeks.
Progression-free survival (PFS), assessed by central radiological assessment, was defined as the time from randomization to disease progression per modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) criteria or death. Participants who were alive but did not meet criteria for progression by the data cutoff date were censored at their last evaluable disease assessment date. Progressive disease is defined as a ≥ 20% increase in the size of target lesions or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions or any new lesions.
From randomization until the data cutoff date of 30 September 2008. Maximum follow-up time was 109 weeks.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall Survival
Time Frame: From randomization until the data cutoff date of 28 August 2009. Maximum time on follow-up was 153 weeks.
The definition of overall survival is the time from randomization to death; participants who were alive at the analysis data cutoff were censored at their last contact date.
From randomization until the data cutoff date of 28 August 2009. Maximum time on follow-up was 153 weeks.
Percentage of Participants With an Objective Response
Time Frame: Every 8 weeks until disease progression up to the data cut-off date of 30 September 2008; Maximum follow-up time was 109 weeks.
Participants were evaluated for tumor response per the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria every 8 weeks until disease progression. Objective response by central radiological assessment was defined as the incidence of either a confirmed complete or partial response (CR or PR) while on the first-line treatment, as determined by blinded independent central review and confirmed no less than 4-weeks after the criteria for response are first met. CR: Disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no new lesions. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions and no progression of non-target or no new lesions, or, disappearance of all target lesions and the persistence of ≥ 1 non-target lesion not qualifying for either CR or progressive disease. Participants without a post-baseline assessment were considered non-responders.
Every 8 weeks until disease progression up to the data cut-off date of 30 September 2008; Maximum follow-up time was 109 weeks.
Time to Progression
Time Frame: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 30 September 2008; Maximum follow-up time was 109 weeks.
Time to progression was defined as time from randomization date to date of disease progression per the modified RECIST criteria.
From randomization until the data cut-off date of 30 September 2008; Maximum follow-up time was 109 weeks.
Duration of Response
Time Frame: Every 8 weeks until disease progression up to the data cut-off date of 30 September 2008; Maximum follow-up time was 109 weeks.
Duration of response was calculated only for those participants with a confirmed CR or PR, as the time from the first CR or PR (subsequently confirmed within no less than 4 weeks) to first observed disease progression per modified RECIST criteria, based on a blinded central review.
Every 8 weeks until disease progression up to the data cut-off date of 30 September 2008; Maximum follow-up time was 109 weeks.
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
Time Frame: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 28 August 2009; Maximum time on follow-up was 153 weeks.
A serious adverse event (SAE) is defined as an AE that • is fatal • is life threatening • requires in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization • results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity • is a congenital anomaly/birth defect • other significant medical hazard. The relationship of the adverse event to the study treatment was assessed by the Investigator by means of the question: "Is there a reasonable possibility that the event may have been caused by the study treatment?"
From randomization until the data cut-off date of 28 August 2009; Maximum time on follow-up was 153 weeks.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

March 22, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 10, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 10, 2006

First Posted (Estimate)

August 15, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 7, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 3, 2022

Last Verified

November 1, 2022

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Clinical Trials on Panitumumab

3
Subscribe