Internet Intervention to Improve Rural Diabetes Care

August 10, 2010 updated by: University of Alabama at Birmingham
Rural Diabetes Online Care (RDOC) will develop an Internet-based intervention for rural primary care physicians, focusing on improving care for adult patients with diabetes. The intervention, drawing upon the principles of quality improvement and providing tools for system-based changes in practice, is designed for the rural practice, where resources are constrained.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This 4-year randomized trial of an Internet-based intervention aims to improve guideline adherence by rural physicians caring for adult patients with type 2 diabetes.

Objectives. (1) Assess barriers to implementation of diabetes guidelines and identify solutions through focus groups and case-based vignette surveys; (2) Develop and implement an interactive Internet intervention including individualized physician performance feedback; (3) Evaluate the intervention in a randomized controlled trial; and (4) Examine the sustainability of improved guideline adherence once feedback ceases.

Methods. In partnership with the University of Alabama rural medicine program, we will randomize 200 rural physician offices to an intervention or comparison arm. Our 18-month intervention, customized to the individual physician in real-time, consists of Internet learning modules with case-based education, performance feedback, and benchmarks. The comparison group will receive a text-based, non-interactive Internet posting of publicly available resources. Nurse practitioners and physician assistants from the offices of study physicians may also participate in the Internet modules. Outcomes will be based on previously developed and validated quality measures for diabetes. The intervention will cover screening, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention. Performance feedback will include 10-15 charts per intervention physician. The main analysis, conducted at the physician level, will compare differential improvement in guideline adherence between the study arms. Ancillary analyses will examine the effects of physician characteristics, other providers in the office, and patient characteristics (e.g., comorbidities, ethnicity, gender, age, and socioeconomic status). Multivariable techniques will adjust for repeated measures, clustering of patients within physicians, and multiple providers within a single office.

Study Population. RDOC will enroll 200 physicians from rural Alabama, Mississippi, Georgia, Tennessee, Florida, Arkansas, Kentucky, North Carolina, South Carolina, Missouri, and West Virginia. Participating physicians will be randomized to receive the intervention or to a comparison group, which will receive traditional, text-based continuing medical education (CME). Each participating physician will allow two rounds of medical record abstraction to be conducted in his/her office. Results from the medical record review: (1) be used in the intervention to provide physicians with personal performance feedback and (2) used to examine change in performance for the intervention and comparison physicians as an evaluation of the entire study.

Significance. This study offers a technologically advanced, theory-grounded intervention for improving care of a high-risk, underserved population. With expertise in translating research into practice, rural medicine, behavioral medicine, health informatics, and clinical diabetes, our multidisciplinary team has a proven record of collaboration. This project will produce an evidence-based and replicable intervention that can be sustained in the "real world," and easily modified for other diseases. This project is substantially improved after making important changes recommended in the second review.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

205

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35294
        • University of Alabama at Birmingham
      • Tuscaloosa, Alabama, United States, 35487
        • University of Alabama

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Rural Primary Care Physicians

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Non-rural non-primary care physicians

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention
Internet-based intervention aims to improve guideline adherence by rural physicians caring for adult patients with type 2 diabetes.
Active Comparator: Control
The comparison group will receive a text-based, non-interactive Internet posting of publicly available resources.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
A1c
Time Frame: January 2005-present
January 2005-present
Blood Pressure
Time Frame: January 2005-present
January 2005-present
Lipids
Time Frame: January 2005-present
January 2005-present

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Eye screening
Time Frame: January 2005-present
January 2005-present
Foot exam
Time Frame: January 2005-present
January 2005-present
Kidney disease monitored
Time Frame: January 2005-present
January 2005-present
Dietary or exercise advice
Time Frame: January 2005-present
January 2005-present
Smoking cessation advice
Time Frame: January 2005-present
January 2005-present

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jeroan J Allison, MD, MS Epi, University of Alabama at Birmingham

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2005

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 21, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 22, 2006

First Posted (Estimate)

November 23, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

August 11, 2010

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 10, 2010

Last Verified

August 1, 2010

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetes Mellitus Type 2

Clinical Trials on Internet Intervention

3
Subscribe