A Study of an Antibiotic Implant in General Surgical Subjects at Higher Risk for Surgical Wound Infection

September 22, 2021 updated by: Innocoll

A Randomized, Controlled, Phase 3 Study of Gentamicin-Collagen Sponge in General Surgical Subjects at Higher Risk for Surgical Wound Infection

The purpose of this study is to determine whether the gentamicin-collagen sponge is safe and effective for preventing surgical wound infections in patients undergoing colorectal surgery.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Surgical wound infection (SWI) is a significant problem in colorectal surgery. Despite the use of routine bowel preparation and prophylactic antibiotics the incidence of SWI is at least 15% in patients undergoing colorectal surgical procedures.Therefore, there is a long unmet need for an intervention that can reduce the incidence and severity of SWIs in patients undergoing colorectal surgery.

Gentamicin is an antibiotic that is effective in treating certain kinds of infection. Collagen is a protein that is found in all mammals. The gentamicin-collagen sponge is a thin flat sponge made out of collagen that comes from cow tendons and containing gentamicin. When inserted into a surgical site, the collagen breaks down and the gentamicin is released at the site but very little is absorbed into the blood stream. The high levels of antibiotic at the surgical site may prevent an infection at the surgical site.

Outside of the United States more than 3,500 subjects have received treatment in clinical studies with the gentamicin-collagen sponge, primarily for orthopedic, intraabdominal, and cardiothoracic surgeries or wound infections following surgical procedures or traumatic events.

In this study, all subjects will be given treatment that is normally given to prevent surgical infections. For subjects randomly assigned to the gentamicin-collagen sponge treatment group, 2 sponges will be inserted into the surgical wound immediately before the surgeon closes it. The control group will receive no collagen sponge.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

602

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alabama
      • Florence, Alabama, United States
      • Mobile, Alabama, United States
    • California
      • Laguna Hills, California, United States
      • Los Angeles, California, United States
      • Stanford, California, United States
    • Colorado
      • Aurora, Colorado, United States
      • Denver, Colorado, United States
    • Florida
      • Tampa, Florida, United States
      • Weston, Florida, United States
    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States
    • Indiana
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
    • Kentucky
      • Louisville, Kentucky, United States
    • Louisiana
      • New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States
    • Michigan
      • Detroit, Michigan, United States
    • Minnesota
      • Duluth, Minnesota, United States
      • Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
    • Missouri
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States
    • New York
      • Albany, New York, United States
      • Brooklyn, New York, United States
      • New York, New York, United States
      • Syracuse, New York, United States
    • North Carolina
      • Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States
      • Greensboro, North Carolina, United States
    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States
    • Oklahoma
      • Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
    • Oregon
      • Portland, Oregon, United States
    • Pennsylvania
      • Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
    • Tennessee
      • Nashville, Tennessee, United States
    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, United States
      • Houston, Texas, United States
      • Temple, Texas, United States
    • Vermont
      • Burlington, Vermont, United States
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States
      • Tacoma, Washington, United States

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Scheduled to undergo nonemergent colon and/or rectal surgical procedures involving a laparotomy incision of at least 7 cm in length or greater. List of eligible procedures: Left Hemicolectomy, Transverse Colectomy, Segmental/Sleeve Left Colon Resection, Total Abdominal Colectomy With Ileorectal Anastomosis, Total Abdominal Colectomy With Ileostomy, Total Abdominal Proctocolectomy (Portion Of Specimen To Be Extracted Via Laparotomy), Low Anterior Resection, Sigmoid Resection, Non-Emergent Hartmann's Procedure, Colotomy With Polypectomy Distal To Hepatic Flexure, Colostomy Takedown Through Laparotomy (Not Peristomal) Incision, Ileo-Pouch Anal Anastomosis, Abdominal Perineal Resection of the Rectum
  • Have the capacity to understand and sign an informed consent form.
  • Are male or female and > 18 years of age.
  • If female, be postmenopausal (no menstrual period for a minimum of 1 year), or surgically sterilized (does not have a uterus or has had bilateral tubal ligation). Females of child-bearing potential must have a negative serum pregnancy test on entry in the study, and agree to use adequate birth control during the study and for 60 days after the administration of study agent.
  • Agree to be available for evaluation from baseline until final evaluation at 60 days postsurgery.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known history of hypersensitivity to gentamicin or bovine collagen.
  • Undergoing emergency surgery (urgent surgery is allowed if informed consent is obtained and the study procedures can be performed). Emergency surgery includes cases where standard bowel preparation and other preoperative assessments cannot be done.
  • Undergoing a significant concomitant surgical procedure (e.g., hysterectomy). The following concomitant procedures are allowed: appendectomy, cholecystectomy, oophorectomy, liver biopsy/wedge resection (but not liver resection).
  • Undergoing a laparoscopic, laparoscopic-assisted, or other minimally invasive surgical approach involving a laparotomy incision less than 7 cm.
  • History of prior laparotomy within the last 60 days of this planned procedure.
  • Planned to undergo a second laparotomy or colorectal surgical procedure (e.g. colostomy or ileostomy takedown) within 60 days of this planned first procedure.
  • Evidence preoperatively of any of the following: sepsis, severe sepsis, or septic shock (note that SIRS alone is not an exclusion criterion)
  • Current abdominal wall infection/surgical site infection from previous laparotomy/laparoscopy or for any reason.
  • Receiving antibiotic therapy within the 1 week prior to the date of surgery.
  • Preoperative evaluation suggests intra-abdominal process that might preclude full closure of the skin.
  • History of ongoing treatment (e.g. chemotherapy, radiation) for non-colorectal cancer.
  • Recent history of significant drug or alcohol abuse.
  • Preoperative prothrombin time (PT) > 1.5 times upper limit of normal
  • Pregnant, lactating, or of childbearing potential not practicing a birth control method with a high degree of reliability
  • Postsurgical life expectancy ≤ 60 days, in the investigator's or sponsor's opinion.
  • Refusal to accept medically indicated blood products.
  • Previous participation in this or any other active Innocoll Gentamicin-Collagen Sponge study.
  • Participation within 30 days before the start of this study in any experimental drug or device study, or currently participating in a study in which the administration of investigational drug or device within 60 days is anticipated.
  • Surgeon does not believe that it will be possible to insert 2 sponges above the fascia in the patient (e.g. in a very thin patient planned to have a small incision)
  • Patients with anterior abdominal wall mesh that is not planned to be completely removed during the planned procedure.
  • Presence of prosthetic cardiac valve.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: PREVENTION
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: 1
Insertion of 2 gentamicin-collagen sponges before closure of the laparotomy (each 10 x 10 cm sponge contains 280 mg collagen and 130 mg gentamicin).
2 gentamicin-collagen sponges inserted before closure of the laparotomy
NO_INTERVENTION: 2
Standard of care, ie, no gentamicin-collagen sponge.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Surgical Wound Infections From Surgery Through Post-operative Day 60
Time Frame: assessed at Postop Day 1, 2, 3, 7, 30 & 60
Primarily, efficacy will be evaluated by a comparison between the 2 study groups of the incidence of surgical wound infections (involving the laparotomy incision) that occur within the period from surgery through postop day 60.
assessed at Postop Day 1, 2, 3, 7, 30 & 60

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants Who Had Superficial Incisional Surgical Wound Infection
Time Frame: assessed at Postop Day 1, 2, 3, 7, 30 & 60
Number of Participants who had superficial incisional surgical wound infection, based on CDC criteria adjudicated by an independent blinded committee
assessed at Postop Day 1, 2, 3, 7, 30 & 60
The Effect of the Gentamicin-collagen Sponge on the Proportion of Patients With Deep Incisional Surgical Wound Infection
Time Frame: assessed at Postop Day 1, 2, 3, 7, 30 & 60
The proportion of subjects who had deep incisional SWI, based on Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) criteria adjudicated by an independent blinded committee
assessed at Postop Day 1, 2, 3, 7, 30 & 60
The Effect of the Gentamicin-collagen Sponge on the ASEPSIS Score
Time Frame: Days 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (or discharge if earlier) and then questionnaire/phone call on post-operative Days 30 and 60.
Mean (SD) ASEPSIS Score Through 60 Days Postoperatively - brief assessment of surgical wound on post-operative Days 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (or discharge if earlier) and then questionnaire/phone call on post-operative Days 30 and 60. Score from each time point is added up and the mean score is reported. Used to compare antibiotic regimens for their effectiveness in preventing or treating wound sepsis, well-defined criteria for outcome are needed. A method of assessing wound healing has been devised that defines carefully the characteristics to be considered and how they are to be awarded points. Objective criteria are also included in the assessment. Points are given for the need for Additional treatment, the presence of Serous discharge, Erythema, Purulent exudate, and Separation of the deep tissues, the Isolation of bacteria, and the duration of inpatient Stay (ASEPSIS). The higher the points the worse outcome. Maximum Points would be 60. Minimum points would be 0
Days 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (or discharge if earlier) and then questionnaire/phone call on post-operative Days 30 and 60.
The Effect of the Gentamicin-collagen Sponge on Length of Hospital Stay Postoperatively.
Time Frame: Immediate post operative period
Immediate post operative period
Number of Participants Who Were Rehospitalized for Surgical Wound Infection Within 60 Days Post-operatively
Time Frame: Through 60 days after surgery
The effect of the gentamicin-collagen sponge on rehospitalization for surgical wound infection.
Through 60 days after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2008

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

March 1, 2009

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

September 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 14, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 24, 2008

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

January 25, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

September 24, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 22, 2021

Last Verified

September 1, 2021

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Surgical Wound Infection

Clinical Trials on gentamicin-collagen sponge dipped in saline

3
Subscribe