A Study To Assess The Ability Of A Crossover Study Design To Detect The Efficacy Of Pregabalin In Post-Traumatic Neuropathic Pain Patients

Methodology Study To Assess The Ability Of A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Two Period Crossover Study To Detect The Effect Of Pregabalin In Post-Traumatic Neuropathic Pain Patients

The purpose of this study is to assess whether a cross-over type study design in post-traumatic neuropathic patients can be used to assess the activity of potential analgesic agents

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Methodology study to evaluate a cross-over study design in post-traumatic neuropathic pain patients.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

25

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alberta
      • Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T2N 4N1
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
    • Ontario
      • Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8N 3Z5
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Sarnia, Ontario, Canada, N7T 4X3
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Jonkoping, Sweden, 551 85
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Linkoping, Sweden, 581 85
        • Pfizer Investigational Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients require a diagnosis of post-traumatic peripheral neuropathic pain (NeP), including post-surgical NeP and NeP due to peripheral nerve injury, which has lasted at least 3 months following the traumatic event.
  • Patients during the screening week must have completed ≥ 4 daily pain scores and have an average daily pain score ≥ 4.
  • Female patients of childbearing potential must have a negative urine pregnancy test at Screening and be practicing an acceptable form of contraception.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with neuropathic pain (NeP) that is not due to trauma; e.g. patients with trigeminal neuralgia, central pain, complex region pain syndrome type I, phantom limb pain, radiculopathy, painful diabetic neuropathy or post-herpetic neuralgia or patients with any other co-existing pain which cannot be differentiate from NeP of peripheral origin.
  • Patients who have previously failed to respond to pregabalin at a total daily dose of equal to or greater than 300 mg or are intolerant to those doses.
  • Patients who have previously failed to respond to gabapentin at a total daily dose of equal to or greater than 1800 mg.
  • Patients with any type or history of malignancy, except either where there has been no ongoing treatment for at least 6 months or all basal cell carcinomas; all patients with a history of brain or spinal tumors will be excluded.
  • Patients who currently have ongoing litigation related to any injury affecting their pain symptomatology.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: A
Oral, 75mg or 150mg capsules, BID
Placebo Comparator: B
Oral, matched capsules, BID

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline to Treatment Week 2 in Daily Pain Rating Scale
Time Frame: Week 0 to Week 2, Week 4 to Week 6 (Baseline to Week 2 [End of Treatment] for each treatment period)
Daily Pain Rating Scale by treatment and sequence using an 11-point Likert scale: range 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain) over the past 24 hours. Self-assessment was performed daily on rising from bed (for the final time in the case of interrupted sleep). Average daily pain score: mean of the previous 7 days daily pain scores. Baseline was defined as the mean of the last 7 pre-treatment pain scores for each period. End of treatment was defined as the mean of the last 7 on treatment pain scores for each period.
Week 0 to Week 2, Week 4 to Week 6 (Baseline to Week 2 [End of Treatment] for each treatment period)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI)
Time Frame: Week 0 to Week 2, Week 4 to Week 6 (Baseline to End of Treatment in Treatment Periods 1 and 2)
NPSI at end of treatment: 10-item self-administered questionnaire assessing 5 dimensions of pain (burning superficial spontaneous pain, pressing deep spontaneous pain, paroxysmal pain, evoked pain, and paresthesia/dysesthesia). Each item consists of a question about the specific qualities of pain and an 11-point numerical scale range: 0 (absence of pain) to 10 (maximum intensity imaginable), and 2 temporal items related to spontaneous and paroxysmal pain. Maximum total score possible = 100.
Week 0 to Week 2, Week 4 to Week 6 (Baseline to End of Treatment in Treatment Periods 1 and 2)
Subject Activity as Captured by the Actiwatch Score Device: Total Activity Score at End of Treatment
Time Frame: Week 0 to Week 2, Week 4 to Week 6 (Baseline to End of Treatment in Treatment Periods 1 and 2)
Total activity score: Day (8 am to 8 pm) at end of treatment. Accelerometer measured physical activity by monitoring degree and intensity of body motion. Data is reported as activity counts. Subject activity was collected hourly for the variables: peak, average, and total activity. Higher score indicates greater activity (no activity = 0; total possible score was not defined).
Week 0 to Week 2, Week 4 to Week 6 (Baseline to End of Treatment in Treatment Periods 1 and 2)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 3, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 3, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

April 9, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 9, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 21, 2021

Last Verified

February 1, 2010

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Nerve Pain

Clinical Trials on Pregabalin (Lyrica)

3
Subscribe