Radiotherapy Planning Based on Positron Emission Tomography With Fluoro-deoxyglucose For Advanced NSCLC (PET-Plan)

July 13, 2016 updated by: Prof. Dr. Ursula Nestle, Arbeitsgemeinschaft Nuklearmedizin und Strahlentherapie der DEGRO und DGN

Optimisation of Radiotherapy-Planning in Patients With Inoperable Locally Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer by FDG-PET

Simultaneous radio-chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. The study focusses on a randomised comparison of conventional radiotherapy planning with irradiation of macroscopic tumor and lymph nodes together with prophylactic target volumes vs. irradiation only of FDG-positive lesions.

Primary endpoint is the local disease control in the chest.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Simultaneous radio-chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. The study focusses on a randomised comparison of conventional radiotherapy planning with irradiation of macroscopic tumor and lymph nodes together with prophylactic target volumes vs. irradiation only of FDG-positive lesions.

Primary endpoint is the local disease control in the chest

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

200

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • histologically proved NSCLC
  • UICC-stage I-III, no resection planned
  • complete staging < 6 wks before treatment including cranial CT
  • ECOG <3, Karnofsky-Index >60%
  • age > 18 <
  • FEV1 > 1,0 l or >35%
  • RT-planning according to protocol feasible
  • chemotherapy feasible
  • written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • neuroendocrine tumors, plain broncho-alveolar-cell ca.
  • distant metastases, supraclavicular lymph node metastases
  • malignant pleural effusion
  • resection of actual tumor performed
  • inclusion in other study protocol
  • chemotherapy due to actual tumor before FDG-PET
  • induction-chemotherapy
  • acute vena cava superior syndrome
  • second malignancy other than basalioma
  • pregnancy, lactation
  • heart insufficiency NYHA III/IV
  • pneumoconiosis with active inflammatory changes of mediastinal lymph nodes
  • acute broncho-pulmonary infection at time of PET-examination

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: A
Irradiation of all tumor manifestations detectable by CT and/or positron emission tomography using fluoro-deoxy-glucose including a part of eventual atelectasis and the whole affected lymph node stations by 60 - 74 Gy/2Gy) irradiation of elective lymph node stations up to 50 Gy/2 Gy
Experimental: B
Irradiation of all tumor manifestations detectable by positron emission tomography using fluoro-deoxy-glucose including the whole affected lymph node stations by 60 - 74 Gy/2Gy
Restriction of target volumes to areas positive in positron emission tomography using fluoro-deoxy-glucose

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
time to local progression
Time Frame: actuarial
Time from randomization to first evidence of local progression or last follow up
actuarial

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall survival
Time Frame: actuarial
Time from randomization to death or last follow up
actuarial
normal tissue toxicity
Time Frame: actuarial
Time from randomization to death or last follow up
actuarial
in and out field progression
Time Frame: actuarial
Time from randomization to progression or last follow up
actuarial

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ursula Nestle, Prof., Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Germany

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

November 1, 2016

Study Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 11, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 12, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

June 13, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

July 14, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 13, 2016

Last Verified

July 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Clinical Trials on restriction of radiotherapy to FDG-PET positive areas only

3
Subscribe