A Study to Compare the Safety and Tolerability of Sativex® in Patients With Neuropathic Pain.

April 7, 2023 updated by: Jazz Pharmaceuticals

A Multicentre, Open Label, Follow on Study to Assess the Maintenance of Effect, Tolerance and Safety of Sativex® in the Treatment of Subjects With Neuropathic Pain. This Will be Followed by a Randomised-withdrawal Phase (Part B) for a Subset of Patients.

The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and tolerability of long term therapy with Sativex® in relieving neuropathic pain.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This was a 38 week, multicentre, open label (Part A) follow-on study to evaluate, the maintenance of effect of, the development of tolerance through exposure to, and safety of, Sativex® in the treatment of subjects with neuropathic pain. The study provided continued availability of Sativex® to subjects who completed the preceding double-blind neuropathic pain studies. Consenting, eligible subjects who had participated in previous GW Pharma Ltd (GW) randomised, placebo-controlled clinical studies entered the study (Visit 1, Day 0) and commenced dosing. Study visits took place at Week 2 (Visit 2, Day 14), Week 14 (Visit 3, Day 98), and Week 26 (Visit 4, Day 182). Subjects returned to the centre for an end of treatment visit at week 38 (Visit 5, Day 266). All subjects received Sativex®. This was followed by a five week randomised-withdrawal phase (Part B) for a subset of subjects. An end of study visit took place 28 days after Visit 5 (or 5b or 5c) or withdrawal from the study.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

380

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • West Midlands
      • Solihull, West Midlands, United Kingdom, B91 2JL,
        • Pain Management Research, Clinical Trials Unit, Netherwood House, Solihull Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Had participated in a GW clinical study to investigate the effects of Sativex® on peripheral neuropathic pain and had completed the study. This must have been within the last seven days
  • Had complied with all of the study requirements in the preceding GW parent RCTs, including the completion of diary cards and study questionnaires
  • Had shown tolerability to the study medication in a preceding GW study
  • Was expected, in the opinion of the investigator, to gain clinical benefit from receiving Sativex® therapy
  • Ability (in the investigators opinion) and willingness to comply with all study requirements, including the completion of diary cards and study questionnaires
  • Agreement for the responsible authorities (as applicable in individual countries), their primary care physician, and their consultant, if appropriate, to be notified of their participation in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of schizophrenia, other psychotic illness, severe personality disorder or other significant psychiatric disorder other than depression associated with their underlying condition
  • Known or suspected history of alcohol or substance abuse
  • History of epilepsy or recurrent seizures
  • Known or suspected hypersensitivity to cannabinoids or any of the excipients of the study medication Evidence of cardiomyopathy
  • Experienced myocardial infarction or clinically relevant cardiac dysfunction within the last 12 months or had a cardiac disorder that, in the opinion of the investigator would put the subject at risk of a clinically relevant arrhythmia or myocardial infarction
  • QT interval; of > 450 ms (males) or > 470 ms (females) at Visit 1
  • Secondary or tertiary AV block or sinus bradycardia (HR <50bpm unless physiological) or sinus tachycardia (HR>110bpm) at Visit 1
  • Diastolic blood pressure of <50 mmHg or >105 mmHg in a sitting position at rest for five minutes prior to measurement at Visit 1
  • Impaired renal function i.e., creatinine clearance is lower than 50ml/min at Visit 1 and is indicative of renal impairment
  • Significantly impaired hepatic function, at Visit 1, in the Investigator's opinion
  • Female subjects of child bearing potential and male subjects whose partner was of child bearing potential, unless they were willing to ensure that they or their partner used effective contraception during the study and for three months thereafter
  • If female, were pregnant or lactating, or were planning pregnancy during the course of the study and for three months thereafter
  • Received an IMP within the 12 weeks before Visit 1 (except the prerequisite study medication from the GW parent RCTs)
  • Any other significant disease or disorder which, in the opinion of the investigator, may either put the subject at risk because of participation in the study, may influence the result of the study or the subject's ability to participate in the study
  • Following a physical examination, the subject had any abnormalities that, in the opinion of the investigator, would prevent the subject from safely participating in the study.
  • Intention to donate blood during the study
  • Previous randomisation into this study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Sativex
Active treatment
containing THC (27 mg/ml):CBD (25 mg/ml), in ethanol:propylene glycol (50:50) excipients, with peppermint oil (0.05%) flavouring. Maximum permitted dose was eight actuations in any three hour period and 24 actuations (THC 65 mg: CBD 60 mg) in 24 hours
Other Names:
  • GW-1000-02

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Parent Study Baseline in Mean Pain 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score During the Last 4 Weeks of Open-label Treatment
Time Frame: 38 weeks
The average pain NRS was complete at the same time each day, i.e. bedtime in the evening. The patient was asked "on a scale of '0 to 10', please indicate the number that best describes your pain or average pain in the last 24 hours" where 0 = no pain and 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine. No pain relates to the time prior to the onset of pain. A negative value indicates an improvement in pain score from baseline.
38 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Parent Study Baseline in Mean Neuropathic Pain Scale (NPS) Score at End of Open-label Treatment (Week 38)
Time Frame: 38 weeks
The NPS score is 0-100 sum of 10 individual pain scores (0-10 NRS, 0= no pain to 10 = most pain imaginable). A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement in pain.
38 weeks
Change From Parent Study Baseline in Mean Sleep Quality 0-10 NRS Score at the End of Open-label Treatment (Week 38)
Time Frame: 38 weeks
The sleep disruption NRS was completed at the same time each day, i.e. bedtime in the evening. The patient was asked "on a scale of '0 to 10', please indicate how your pain disrupted your sleep last night?" where 0 = did not disrupt sleep and 10 = completely disrupted (unable to sleep at all). A negative value indicates an improvement in sleep disruption score from baseline.
38 weeks
Subject Global Impression of Change
Time Frame: week 38
A 7-point Likert-type scale was used, with the question: 'Please assess the status of your pain since entry into the study using the scale below' with the markers "very much improved, much improved, slightly improved, no change, slightly worse, much worse or very much worse". At Visit 2 (Baseline) patients wrote a brief description of their pain which was used at Week 5 to aid their memory regarding their symptoms at study start. For each of above markers the number of participants were reported.
week 38
Change From Parent Study Baseline in Mean EuroQol-5D Weighted Health State Index Score at the End of Open-label Treatment
Time Frame: 38 weeks
The EQ-5D questionnaire provided two outcomes:(1)A weighted health state index visual analogue scale (VAS); (2) A self-rated health status VAS. EQ-5D Health Status VAS Scale: 0 = worst health state imaginable to 100 = best health state imaginable. An increase in score indicates an improvement in condition.The weighted health state index used the same VAS as above but was calculated for each assessment without imputation to account for missing values i.e., if one or more individual items was missing then the whole index was missing.
38 weeks
Change From Parent Study Baseline in Mean EuroQol-5D Self-rated Health Status Visual Analogue Scale Score at the End of Open-label Treatment
Time Frame: 38 weeks
The EQ-5D questionnaire provided two outcomes:(1)A weighted health state index visual analogue scale (VAS); (2) A self-rated health status VAS. EQ-5D Health Status VAS Scale: 0 = worst health state imaginable to 100 = best health state imaginable. An increase in score indicates an improvement in condition.
38 weeks
Incidence of Adverse Events as a Measure of Subject Safety
Time Frame: 42 weeks
The number of subjects who reported an adverse event during Part A of the study is presented (including the follow-up period of 28 days following cessation of opel-label treatment).
42 weeks
Change From Parent Study Baseline in Mean Intoxication 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale Score at the End of Open-label Treatment (38 Weeks)
Time Frame: 38 weeks
The patient was asked "on a scale of '0 to 10' please indicate the average level of your intoxication due to medications over the last 24 hours" (0=no intoxication and 10=extreme toxication). A negative value indicates an improvement in pain score from baseline.
38 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2005

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2007

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2007

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 10, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 10, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

July 11, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 3, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 7, 2023

Last Verified

April 1, 2023

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

Clinical Trials on Sativex®

3
Subscribe