Aspirin Statins Or Both For The Reduction Of Thrombin Generation In Diabetic People (RATIONAL)

October 25, 2011 updated by: Fundacion GESICA

Despite formal recommendations, evidence of efficacy of aspirin in individuals with diabetes is scant and controversial. While the efficacy of aspirin versus placebo in patients with diabetes is currently under investigation in big randomized controlled trials, the putative additive effects of aspirin and statins in this population remain to be investigated. Moreover there are no data examining the pathophysiologic means by which aspirin with or without statins affects thrombosis in diabetic patients.

The aim of this trial is to evaluate the efficacy of low-dose aspirin (100 mg/daily), statins, both or neither for the reduction of thrombin generation. These preventive strategies will be evaluated on the top of the other strategies aimed at optimizing the care of diabetic patients in terms of metabolic control and control of the other cardiovascular risk factors.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Despite the very high cardiovascular risk profile, evidence of efficacy of aspirin in individuals with diabetes is scant.

The meta-analysis on the efficacy of antiplatelet therapy involving a total of about 5,000 diabetic subjects indicates a non significant reduction in the risk of major cardiovascular events of 7%, compared with a reduction of 25% documented in secondary prevention studies.

Diabetes could represent a special case of aspirin resistance, although no specific studies have, to our knowledge, fully explored this hypothesis. The poor platelet responsiveness to aspirin has been recently proposed as a possible explanation of the failure of antiplatelet therapy to prevent cardiovascular events. The reduction in the aspirin activity in some patients is indicated by the failure in adequately suppressing thromboxane-A2 synthesis, as documented by the presence of high levels of its urinary metabolites.

The substantial lack of clear evidence is reflected by the low use of this drug in clinical practice; in fact, only 10% of diabetic patients are treated with aspirin for the prevention of cardiovascular events.

On the other hand, statins provide a similar efficacy for the prevention of major cardiovascular events in populations with and without diabetes.

It has been recently shown that platelet response to aspirin is linearly reduced with increasing cholesterol plasma levels. The presence of dyslipidemia, particularly common among diabetic patients, could thus be at least partially responsible for a lower efficacy of aspirin in this population. The concomitant use of statins could thus restore the normal platelet sensitivity to aspirin by reducing cholesterol levels

One additional reason to hypothesize a positive effect of statins in improving platelet response to aspirin is related to their anti-inflammatory properties

While the efficacy of aspirin versus placebo in patients with diabetes is currently under investigation, the additive effects of aspirin and statins in this population remain to be investigated. This aspect is of particular interest in the light of the existing debate regarding the need of multiple interventions to reduce total cardiovascular risk.

Given these premises, it is important to evaluate the effectiveness of aspirin use in primary prevention of cardiovascular events in association with statins therapy when included in a strategy of global risk control.

The RATIONAL Study will evaluate whether the combined use of aspirin (100 mg d) and statins (Atorvastatin 40 mg daily) is superior to the use of these single agents for the reduction of thrombin generation in patients with diabetes and without previous cardiovascular events.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Buenos Aires, Argentina
        • Centro de Educación Médica e Investigaciones Clínicas (CEMIC)

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diabetes mellitus treated with insulin or orl agents
  • At least 50 years old

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous cardiovascular events
  • current or past (within last 30 days) treatment with aspirin
  • current or past (within last 180 days) treatment with statins

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: 1
Experimental: 2
Aspirin 100 mg / day
100 mg / day for 8 weeks
Experimental: 3
Atorvastatin 40 mg / day
40 mg / day for 8 weeks
Experimental: 4
Aspirin 100 mg / day + Atorvastatin 40 mg / day
Aspirin 100 mg / day + Atorvastatin 40 mg / day for 8 weeks

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Thrombin generation
Time Frame: 8 weeks
8 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
C-reactive protein
Time Frame: 8 weeks
8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Alejandro Macchia, MD, Fundación GESICA
  • Principal Investigator: Hernan Doval, MD, Fundación GESICA
  • Principal Investigator: Juan J Fuselli, MD, Centro de Educación Medica e Investigaciones Clínicas Norberto Quirno
  • Principal Investigator: Pablo D Comignani, MD, Hospital Aleman

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 18, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 18, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

November 19, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

October 26, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 25, 2011

Last Verified

October 1, 2011

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetes Mellitus

Clinical Trials on Aspirin

3
Subscribe