Sorafenib Therapy Prior to Radiofrequency Ablation for Intermediate Sized Hepatocellular Cancer

June 9, 2023 updated by: Andrea Bullock, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase II Trial Of Short Course Sorafenib Therapy Prior to Radiofrequency Ablation for Intermediate Sized (3.5 to 7cm) Hepatocellular Cancer

The purpose of this research study is to determine if sorafenib improves the effectiveness of a procedure called radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for the treatment of hepatocellular cancer (HCC). Radiofrequency ablation has been used to treat many types of tumors, including hepatocellular cancers. During RFA a needle is inserted into the tumor tissue and heat is used to kill the tumor cells. Sorafenib has been approved by the FDA for the treatment of hepatocellular cancer that cannot be treated with surgery. Pre-clinical data suggests that sorafenib may improve the efficacy of RFA.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Hepatocellular cancer (HCC) has a poor prognosis with increasing mortality in the United States. Because HCC generally develops in patients with underlying liver disease, resection is often not possible. Liver transplant improves survival for HCC patients but given the national organ donor shortage often patients have to wait a considerable time for transplant. Liver-directed therapies such as radiofrequency ablation (RFA) remain important tools to control tumor growth and to potentially "bridge" patients to liver transplant. However, liver-directed therapies for HCC tumors greater than 3cm in size are suboptimal, leaving a critical unmet need.

Antiangiogenic systemic agents, such as oral sorafenib, reduce tumor blood flow and have been shown to improve RFA efficacy in animal and in computer models.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02215
        • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
        • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Confirmed hepatocellular cancer (HCC) by pathology or by NCCN imaging guidelines
  • All HCC stages are allowed. May be a liver transplant candidate.
  • At least one tumor (index tumor) accurately measured as 3.5-7cm in diameter (long and short axis diameter to be recorded, but only one needs to meet this criteria) on baseline imaging.
  • No prior therapy for the index tumor
  • No prior systemic treatment for HCC within 4 weeks and no prior anti-VEGF therapy within 8 weeks of study entry.
  • Life expectancy > 8 weeks.
  • ECOG >=0 or 1
  • RFA clinically indicated for index tumor.
  • Acceptable overall RFA and anesthesia risk.
  • Adequate bone marrow, liver and renal function: Hemoglobin >9.0 g/dl; Absolute neutrophil count (ANC)>1,500/mm3; Platelet count correctable to >50,000/mm3; compensated liver function (Child-Turcotte-Pugh A, B7 or B8); Creatinine <1.5 times ULN; INR correctable to <1.5.
  • Ability to take oral medication and no evidence of impaired absorption.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Urgent treatment of the index tumor anticipated.
  • Participants who have not recovered from adverse events due to agents administered more than 4 weeks earlier. Participants currently receiving any other study agents.
  • Known brain metastases
  • History of allergic reactions attributed to compounds of similar chemical or biologic composition to sorafenib.
  • Participants receiving medications or substances that are inducers of CYP3A4 (rifampicin, St. John's wort, phenytoin, carbamazepine, phenobarbital and dexamethasone) or that are metabolized/eliminated by predominantly UGT1A1 pathway or by CYP2B6 and CYP2C8.
  • Decompensated liver disease
  • Uncontrolled hypertension
  • Thrombolic or embolic events within the past 6 months.
  • Hemorrhage/bleeding event within 4 weeks
  • Serious non-healing wound, ulcer, or bone fracture.
  • Evidence of severe or uncorrectable bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy
  • Major surgery, open biopsy or significant traumatic injury within 4 weeks of study entry.
  • Contraindication to or inability to undergo the RFA procedure,
  • Contraindication to or inability to undergo imaging with MRI
  • Uncontrolled intercurrent illness
  • Individuals with a history of a different malignancy unless disease-free for at least 5 years and are deemed by the Investigator to be at low risk for recurrence. Individuals with the following cancers are eligible if diagnosed and treated within the past 5 years: cervical cancer in situ, and basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin.
  • HIV-positive individuals on combination antiretroviral therapy

For additional inclusion/exclusion criteria details contact Study Site.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Sorafenib
Participants received a nine-day course of oral sorafenib 400 mg twice a day and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) on Day 10. Tumors in each group underwent RFA using a standard regimen (1 cm tip, 70 ± 2º C, 5 min).
Other Names:
  • Nexavar
Other Names:
  • RFA
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Participants received a nine-day course of placebo pills twice a day and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) on Day 10. Tumors in each group underwent RFA using a standard regimen (1 cm tip, 70 ± 2º C, 5 min).
Other Names:
  • RFA

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Coagulation Zone Diameter-Short Axis
Time Frame: Up to day 50 from study enrollment (target 30 days after RFA)
The size of the coagulation zone was determined on CT imaging obtained after RFA for the single index tumor.
Up to day 50 from study enrollment (target 30 days after RFA)
Coagulation Zone Diameter-Long Axis
Time Frame: Up to day 50 from study enrollment (target 30 days after RFA)
The size of the coagulation zone was determined on CT imaging obtained after RFA for the single index tumor.
Up to day 50 from study enrollment (target 30 days after RFA)
Coagulation Zone Volume
Time Frame: Up to day 50 from study enrollment (target 30 days after RFA)
The size of the coagulation zone was determined on CT imaging obtained after RFA for the single index tumor.
Up to day 50 from study enrollment (target 30 days after RFA)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility Rate
Time Frame: Up to day 14 since enrollment
Feasibility rate is defined as the percentage of participants completing radiofrequency ablation following 9 days of sorafenib or placebo therapy.
Up to day 14 since enrollment
Number of Treatment-Related Grade 1-4 Adverse Events (AEs) by Day 9
Time Frame: Day 9
AEs were assessed based on the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v3.0). The number of Grade 1-4 AEs with treatment attribution possibly, probably or definitely related up to day 9 of study drug treatment were counted for this outcome. Worst grade by patient within AE type was calculated. Participants could have multiple different AE types within a grade.
Day 9
Number of Treatment-Related Grade 1-4 Adverse Events (AEs) on Day of Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA)
Time Frame: Up to day 14 (target day 10 RFA)
AEs were assessed based on the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v3.0). The number of Grade 1-4 AEs with treatment attribution possibly, probably or definitely related on day of RFA treatment were counted for this outcome. Worst grade by patient within AE type was calculated. Participants could have multiple AE types within a grade.
Up to day 14 (target day 10 RFA)
Number of Treatment-Related Grade 1-4 Adverse Events (AEs) One Month After Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA)
Time Frame: Up to day 40 post RFA (target 30 days)
AEs were assessed based on the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v3.0). The number of Grade 1-4 AEs with treatment attribution possibly, probably or definitely related one month after RFA treatment were counted for this outcome. Worst grade by patient within AE type was calculated. Participants could have multiple AE types within a grade.
Up to day 40 post RFA (target 30 days)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Andrea Bullock, MD, MPH, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 22, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 22, 2008

First Posted (Estimated)

December 23, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

June 13, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 9, 2023

Last Verified

June 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hepatocellular Cancer

Clinical Trials on Sorafenib

3
Subscribe