A Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics of PEP005 (Ingenol Mebutate) Gel, 0.05%, When Applied in a Maximal Use Setting to the Dorsal Aspect of the Forearm in Patients With Actinic Keratosis

February 18, 2015 updated by: Peplin

A Randomized, Double-blind, Vehicle-controlled Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics of PEP005 (Ingenol Mebutate) Gel, 0.05%, When Applied in a Maximal Use Setting to the Dorsal Aspect of the Forearm in Patients With Actinic Keratosis

This Phase II study is designed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of PEP005 (ingenol mebutate) Gel, 0.05% when applied in a maximal use setting to the dorsal aspect of the forearm in patients with actinic keratoses

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

16

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Austin, Texas, United States, 78759
        • Dermresearch, Inc.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female;
  • Multiple actinic keratosis (AK) lesions over a 100 cm^2 area of skin located on the dorsal aspect of one forearm.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cosmetic or therapeutic procedures: within 2 weeks and within 2 cm of the selected treatment area(s);
  • Treatment with immunomodulators, or interferon/interferon inducers or systemic medications that suppress the immune system: within 4 weeks;
  • Treatment with 5-FU, imiquimod, diclofenac, or photodynamic therapy: within 8 weeks and within 2 cm of the selected treatment area(s).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: TRIPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: PEP005 (ingenol mebutate) Gel, 0.05%
PEP005 (ingenol mebutate) Gel 0.05% once daily for 2 consecutive days
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Vehicle Gel
Vehicle Gel once daily for 2 consecutive days

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) for Ingenol Mebutate and Its Two Acyl Isomers (PEP015 and PEP025) Levels
Time Frame: 1 day
Maximum observed concentration (Cmax) for ingenol mebutate and its two acyl isomers (PEP015 and PEP025) levels over the 24 hour sampling time period based on actual values measured. Blood samples were taken: at 30 minutes, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24 hours following study medication application on Day 2.
1 day
Time at Which Cmax is Attained (Tmax) for Ingenol Mebutate, and Its Two Acyl Isomers (PEP015 and PEP025) Levels.
Time Frame: 1 day
Time at which Cmax is attained (Tmax) for ingenol mebutate, and its two acyl isomers (PEP015 and PEP025) levels measured at 30 min, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24 hours following study medication application on Day 2. If a maximum value occured at more than one timepoint Tmax is defined as the first timepoint with this value.
1 day
Area Under the Blood Conc. Versus Time Curve for Time 0-24 Hours (AUC(0-24)) for Ingenol Mebutate and Its Two Acyl Isomers (PEP015 and PEP025) Levels
Time Frame: 1 day
Area under the blood conc. versus time curve was calculated for time 0-24 hours (AUC(0-24)) for ingenol mebutate and its two acyl isomers (PEP015 and PEP025) levels measured at 30 min, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24 hours following study medication application on Day 2.
1 day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Complete Clearance Rate in a 25 cm^2 Area Within the Selected Treatment Area
Time Frame: baseline and day 57
Number of participants with complete clearence. Complete clearance rate is defined as no clinically visible actinic keratosis (AK) lesions in a 25 cm^2 area within the selected treatment area at Day 57 compared to baseline
baseline and day 57
Percentage (%) Change in Actinic Keratosis (AK) Lesions in a 25 cm^2 Area Within the Selected Treatment Area
Time Frame: Baseline and Day 57
Percentage (%) change in actinic keratosis (AK) lesions count at Day 57, compared to baseline, in a 25 cm^2 area within the selected treatment area.
Baseline and Day 57
Number of Patients With Local Skin Responses (LSRs) Above 0 at Any Time Point During the Study.
Time Frame: baseline and Day 2, 3, 8, 15, 29 and 57
Number of patients with LSR at any time point during the study above 0. The treatment area was assessed at baseline and at each subsequent study visit for the presence and grade of the following Local Skin Responses (LSRs): erythema, flaking/scaling, crusting, swelling, vesiculation/pustulation, and erosion/ulceration using the Local Skin Response Grading Scale (version 5). Each LSR was graded from 0 (best outcome) to 4 (worst outcome). A composite LSR score was calculated as the sum of each individual LSR grade, giving a possible range of 0-24.
baseline and Day 2, 3, 8, 15, 29 and 57
Patients With Incidence of Pigmentation and Scarring
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 2, 3, 8, 15, 29 and 57
Patients with Incidence of pigmentation and scarring, and grade of pigmentation and scarring, following study treatment through Day 57
Baseline, Day 2, 3, 8, 15, 29 and 57
Max Composite Local Skin Response (LSR) Score
Time Frame: Day 3
Max composite Local Skin Response (LSR) score on day 3 only . The treatment area was assessed at baseline and at each subsequent study visit for the presence and grade of the following Local Skin Responses (LSRs): erythema, flaking/scaling, crusting, swelling, vesiculation/pustulation, and erosion/ulceration using the Local Skin Response Grading Scale (version 5). Each LSR was graded from 0 (best outcome) to 4 (worst outcome). A composite LSR score was calculated as the sum of each individual LSR grade, giving a possible range of 0-24. (One vehicle treated patent had a LSR on day 1 only).
Day 3

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2009

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

June 1, 2009

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

June 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 22, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 24, 2009

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

February 26, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

March 6, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 18, 2015

Last Verified

April 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PEP005-017

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Actinic Keratosis

Clinical Trials on PEP005 (ingenol mebutate) Gel, 0.05%

3
Subscribe