Fluticasone Furoate Treatment of Daytime Somnolence and Cognitive Performance in Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis

May 14, 2018 updated by: Lyndon Mansfield, Western Sky Medical Research

A Double Blind, Placebo Controlled Randomized Trial Evaluating the Effects of Fluticasone Nasal Spray in Subjects With Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis and a History of Sleep Disturbance on Cognitive Performance and Daytime Sleepiness

The hypothesis is that treating hay fever patients who had daytime sleepiness and slowed thinking because of the hay fever will improve when treated with an effective anti-hay fever medication, an intranasal steroid, that is will have less daytime sleepiness and demonstrate better thinking.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

In this study of patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis we will monitor daytime sleepiness as measured by validated daytime sleep score (Eppworth Daytime Sleepiness Scale) and cognitive performance weekly as measured by a validated test of cognitive performance (TOVA). The treatment group with intervention of fluticasone furoate nasal spray 110 mcg two sprays in each nostril once daily will be compared to a placebo treated group of similar subjects with seasonal allergic rhinitis.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Phase 4

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 55 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Symptomatic seasonal allergic rhinitis symptoms for at least 2 years at the time of study in the season of the study.
  • Allergy skin tests positive for the airborne allergens present at the study time within the past 12 months.
  • A score of 2 or more on the NRQLQ of the Rhinitis Quality of LIfe Questionnaire.
  • Active allergic rhinitis on 4 of 7 days during run-in week, and evidence on sleep scales of drowsiness on 3 of 7 days.
  • Ability to read, understand and give informed consent.
  • Ability to understand and carry out responsibilities of the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any chronic disease or other acute disease, which could influence central nervous system.
  • The use of any medication, which could affect central nervous system function.
  • Unwillingness to participate in the study.
  • Inability to understand testing procedures or use of medication.
  • Hypersensitivity to fluticasone or vehicle of nasal sprays.
  • Any sleep disorders including obstructive sleep apnea.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Placebo treatment given as a once daily dose intranasally.in subjects with active seasonal allergic rhinitis.
Fluticasone nasal spray 2 sprays each nostril will be compared to similar appearing placebo. The subjects will receive one week placebo nasal spray to establish a baseline then they will then be switched to a nasal spray of Placebo once daily and continue the evaluations.
Other Names:
  • Placebo Veramyst Nasal Spray
Experimental: Fluticasone Furoate
IFluticasone Furoate 110 mcg given intranasly once daily in am as an active treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis
Fluticasone fuorate nasal spray 110 mcg 2 sprays each nostril am will be compared to similar appearing placebo given 2 sprays each nostril am. The subjects will receive one week placebo nasal spray to establish a baseline then they will then be switched to a nasal spray of fluticasone furoate 110 mcg once daily and continue the evaluations.
Other Names:
  • Fluticasone Furoate Nasal Spray

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Performance on Test of Variables of Attention (TOVA) - a Standardized Test of Cognitive Performance
Time Frame: over 2 weeks
The outcomes measures for TOVA are errors of omission. Targets which were not identified. Errors of commission are when targets are identified incorrectly. Reaction time is reported as the average time in milliseconds for the responses. The results are reported as mean and standard deviation as baseline and after 2 weeks of intervention. The difference between the means was evaluated by paired t testing.
over 2 weeks
Performance on Test of Variables of Attention (TOVA) - a Standardized Test of Cognitive Performance, Errors of Commission.
Time Frame: after 2 weeks intervention
The outcomes measures for TOVA are errors of commission. Targets which were identified incorrectly. Targets which are not identified, errors of omission and average time of each target viewing.
after 2 weeks intervention
Performance on Test of Variables of Attention (TOVA) - a Standardized Test of Cognitive Performance, Response Time for Targets.
Time Frame: over 2 weeks
The outcomes measures for TOVA are the length of time to respond to targets. The time function represents the average time spent in milliseconds spent on each target.
over 2 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Epworth Sleep Scale
Time Frame: Baseline and after 2 weeks intervention
The Epworth sleepiness scale measures is a validated test of daytime sleepiness which involved the subjects answering 8 questions. Each question is answered on a 0 - 3 scale with 3 being the most likely associated with drowsiness. The score is reported as a composite score of 8 questions, with a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 24. A higher composite score represents more likelihood of daytime sleepiness. It is administered between 1500 and 1700 daily.
Baseline and after 2 weeks intervention
Change From Baseline in Nocturnal Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionaire
Time Frame: 2 weeks
In nocturnal rhinoconjunctivitis quality of life questionnaire instrument to measure the effects of nasal disorder on nighttime sleep and awakening. It consists of 16 questions. The scale is from 0-6, 0 being not troubled and 6 reflecting extreme trouble. This survey is interpreted as a minimal clinically important difference of each question. A change of +/- 0.5 is a threshold of minimally important clinical difference. Higher value mean more disturbance.
2 weeks
Nasal Symptom Scores
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Total nasal symptom score was measured AM and PM. The reflective scale measures subjective symptoms over the previous 12 hours. Instantaneous symptoms measure how subjects felt at the present time. The score consists of subjective perception of nasal congestion, rhinorrhea, nasal itching and sneezing. The scale for each symptom is 0 - not present, 1- mild (present but minimal), 2 - moderate (symptoms are bothersome but tolerable), 3 - severe (symptoms are not tolerable). The baseline value was the mean of the 7 day placebo run-in for the combined scores. This was calculated for the placebo group and the fluticasone group for both the instantaneous and the reflective scores. The intervention time utilized the same combined AM and PM reflective and instantaneous scoring. The data was analyzed using two sample t test comparison of the placebo vs fluticasone furoate group. Low value, less symptoms. High value, more symptoms. Minimum score is 0. Maximum score is 24.
2 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 15, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 16, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

October 19, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 18, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 14, 2018

Last Verified

May 1, 2018

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis

Clinical Trials on Placebo

3
Subscribe