Assessment of the Nociception During Lumbar Surgery (CARDEAN-2)

April 6, 2010 updated by: University Hospital, Grenoble
The aim of the study is to assess the accuracy of a new paradigm in measuring the level of nociception during lumbar surgery. The paradigm is based the measurement of the baroreflex in response to noxious stimuli in anesthetized patients.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

The study aims at exploring the changes in the baroreflex induced by 3 noxious stimulation in anesthetized patients: tracheal intubation, tetanic stimulus, and surgical incision. Patients are randomly assigned to one of 2 groups: remifentanil-2 or remifentanil-4, corresponding to the target effect site concentration of this drug delivered through a TCI system. Other drugs included propofol and cisatracurium.

The paradigm exploring the baroreflex collects information continuously recorded of the RR intervals and the changes in systolic arterial pressure, before and during noxious stimuli. The hypothesis is that this paradigm explores nociception as the group with smaller doses in remifentanil will have more cardiovascular reactions in response to noxious stimuli.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

16

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Grenoble, France, 38043
        • University Hospital Grenoble

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ASA classification I-II
  • undergoing lumbar surgery for discal hernia
  • body mass index <30 kg/m2

Exclusion Criteria:

  • ASA classification III-IV
  • cardiac history that precludes RR recording : atrial fibrillation, arterial hypertension, active cardiac pacing, chronic treatment with beta-blockers, alpha-blockers, calcium-blockers and angiotensin receptors inhibitors
  • diabetes
  • regular intake of cocaine, alcohol
  • pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: remifentanil-2
In this group, patients are receiving a continuous i.v. infusion of remifentanil according to a target effect site concentration of 2 ng/ml.
anesthesia is induced and maintained with a target-controlled infusion of remifentanil at 2 ng/ml.
anesthesia is induced and maintained with a target-controlled infusion of remifentanil at 4 ng/ml.
Active Comparator: remifentanil-4
In this group, patients are receiving a continuous i.v. infusion of remifentanil according to a target effect site concentration of 4 ng/ml.
anesthesia is induced and maintained with a target-controlled infusion of remifentanil at 2 ng/ml.
anesthesia is induced and maintained with a target-controlled infusion of remifentanil at 4 ng/ml.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
changes in the baroreflex in response to noxious stimuli
Time Frame: intraoperative
intraoperative

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
perioperative requirements in anesthetic agents.
Time Frame: intraoperative
intraoperative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jean-Francois PAYEN, M.D., University Hospital, Grenoble

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 17, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 17, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

November 18, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 7, 2010

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 6, 2010

Last Verified

April 1, 2010

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lumbar Surgery

Clinical Trials on remifentanil

3
Subscribe