A Comparison of the Success Rate Of Cannulation Between The Accuvein Apparatus And Standard Technique

November 2, 2011 updated by: St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
  1. This study will compare the first attempt success rate of cannulation in research participants randomized to using a new FDA approved AccuVein AV300 device for intravenous access with research participants randomized to standard cannulation methods.
  2. This study will assess if insertion of intravenous cannula is faster when intravenous access is assisted by the AccuVein AV300 device as compared to the standard technique.
  3. This study will assess if the number of skin punctures is fewer when intravenous access is assisted by the AccuVein AV300 device as compared to the standard technique.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Patients agreeing to participate in this study will be randomized to one of two groups for intravenous access. One group will use the standard cannulation method and the other group will use the new FDA approved AccuVein AV300 device for cannulation.

After pre-anesthetic evaluation, the research participant will be brought to the operating room or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) Suite and standard monitoring will be applied (EKG, SpO2, BP) if tolerated. Anesthesia will be induced via a face mask with sevoflurane in 100% O2. When the supervising anesthesiologist deems it appropriate, attempt at cannulation will begin.

A tourniquet will be applied. A 22-gauge cannula will be used. Randomization will take place before the patient is taken back to the Operating Room or MRI Suite. If the research participant has been randomized to the standard treatment group then cannulation will be attempted in the standard manner. If the research participant has been randomized to the AV300 device group then intravenous cannulation will be attempted using the AV300 device following the manufacturer's instructions.

A research team member will time cannulation access for all participants. Participation ends once successful cannulation is achieved or when a maximum of 4 skin punctures have been made.

Only the study coordinator will know which randomization group the patient has been assigned. Once the anesthesiologist has determined a potential IV access site, s/he will be informed to which group the patient was assigned. If the parent/guardian requests, s/he will be told after the procedure to which group the child was randomized.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

146

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Tennessee
      • Memphis, Tennessee, United States, 38105
        • St . Jude Children's Research Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

No older than 18 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Infants and children under 18 years of age.
  2. American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) Physical Status I, II or III.
  3. Patients undergoing elective surgery,examination under anesthesia,or MRI who do not have existing intravenous access.
  4. Able to understand English.
  5. Parent/guardian willing to sign consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Existing intravenous access.
  2. Malformations or infections at the potential site of insertion.
  3. Inability or unwillingness of research participant or legal guardian/representative to give written informed consent.
  4. Need for emergency surgery.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Group A
Research participants are randomly assigned into group A (Accuvein AV300 assisted intravenous catheter insertion)
If the research participant has been randomized to the AV300 device group A, then intravenous cannulation will be attempted using the AV300 device following manufacturer's instructions by four anesthesiologists.
Other: Group B
(standard technique of insertion of the intravenous cannula)
If the research participant has been randomized to the standard treatment group B then cannulation will be attempted in the standard manner. A research team member will time cannulation access for all participants. Participation ends once successful cannulation is achieved or when a maximum of 4 skin punctures have been made.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
First Attempt Success Rate of Cannulation
Time Frame: At cannulation
This study will compare the first attempt success rate of cannulation in research participants randomized to using a new FDA approved AccuVein AV300 device for intravenous access with research participants randomized to standard cannulation methods. There is one timepoint for outcome data collection and it is prior to cannulation. Success (yes) is defined as needle insertion into target vein.
At cannulation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time Between Tourniquet Application and Successful Cannulation is Achieved or 4 Attempts Have Been Made (in Minutes).
Time Frame: At cannulation
To assess if insertion of intravenous cannula is faster when intravenous access is assisted by the AccuVein AV 300 device as compared to the standard technique
At cannulation
Number of Skin Punctures
Time Frame: At cannulation
To assess if the number of skin punctures is fewer when intravenous access is assisted by the AccuVein AV300 device as compared to the standard technique
At cannulation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Luis Trujillo Huaccho, MD, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 4, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 4, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

January 5, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 7, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 2, 2011

Last Verified

November 1, 2011

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • ACVEIN

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cannulation

Clinical Trials on Cannulation using Accuvein device

3
Subscribe