- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01065675
Medication Histories Conducted by Nurses (RNs), Pharmacy Techs (CPhTs) & Pharmacists (RPhs)
Electronic Patient Triage Development and Implementation Involving Nurse (RN), Pharmacy Technician (CPhT), and Pharmacist (RPh) Obtained Medication Histories in the Emergency Department (ED)and Impact on Medication Reconciliation
Up to 50% of medication errors and 20% of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in the hospital setting are estimated to be related to communication issues regarding patient medications at various transition points of care from admission to discharge. The Joint Commission (TJC) requires accurate and complete medication reconciliation occur at each transition point throughout hospitalization. Evidence from NQF demonstrates pharmacists (RPh) are the most effective medication management team leaders in the implementation of medication management practices and design of medication error reduction strategies; medication reconciliation is one of the five safety objectives pharmacists are recommended to lead. In addition, the Massachusetts Coalition for the Prevention of Medical Errors states strong evidence supports the use of pharmacy technicians (CPhT) in conjunction with pharmacists in completing accurate medication histories.
WMC nurses (RN) currently are involved in the medication reconciliation process. In 2009, a Medication Use Evaluation (MUE) of Medication Reconciliation Accuracy found a 67% medication error rate on admission determined by comparing the nurse-obtained medication history to the pharmacist-obtained medication history. The number of home medications identified by the pharmacist compared to the nurse was 411 versus 312 (p<0.0001). The total percentage of medication errors prevented by the pharmacist was 66.2. Using the VA Healthcare Failure Mode Effects Analysis - HFMEA™ Hazard Scoring Matrix, 3 independent pharmacist reviewers found that 18% of patients interviewed had a score greater than 7, and 3 patients had a score of 12 (major/probable), if the discrepancies would not have been identified and corrected by the pharmacist conducting the admission medication reconciliation audit. The same patients' discharge medication reconciliation and discharge medication lists were retrospectively reviewed for the MUE, and the total percentage of patients with medication errors on discharge was 43%.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Kansas
-
Wichita, Kansas, United States, 67214
- Wesley Medical Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients admitted as inpatients from the Emergency Department
Exclusion Criteria:
- Prisoners (because the IRB does not have a prisoner representative)
- Patients not admitted as inpatients through the Emergency Department
- Patients admitted more than once during the study period
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: Single
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
---|---|
To determine which patients benefit most from medication histories obtained by the RN, CPhT, or RPh based on accuracy (% complete disease states, allergy documentation and description, vaccination documentation, medication documentation)
Time Frame: 5 months
|
5 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Joan S Kramer, PharmD, Wesley Medical Center
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 09-068 (University of Chicago)
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Emergency Department
-
healthEworks LLCNational Institutes of Health (NIH)UnknownCompliance | Emergency Department Aftercare | Emergency Department UtilizationUnited States
-
University of Southern CaliforniaUniversity of California, Los Angeles; National Institute on Aging (NIA); University... and other collaboratorsWithdrawnEmergency DepartmentUnited States
-
University of Wisconsin, MadisonActive, not recruitingEmergency Department VisitUnited States
-
The Hospital for Sick ChildrenCompletedEmergency Department VisitCanada
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisRecruitingHospitalization | Emergency DepartmentFrance
-
Centre Hospitalier de Saint-DenisRecruiting
-
Hospital Pharmacy of North Norway TrustUniversity Hospital of North Norway; University of Tromso; Nordlandssykehuset HF and other collaboratorsActive, not recruitingEmergency Department | Clinical PharmacistNorway
-
The Behavioural Insights TeamUnknownAvoidable Emergency Department Attendances
-
Brigham and Women's HospitalRecruiting
-
Baylor Research InstituteBaylor University; JPS Health NetworkUnknownEmergency Department Overcrowding