Observation of Treatment With Certolizumab Pegol in Daily Practice (FasT)

October 6, 2015 updated by: UCB Pharma GmbH

A Multicenter, Observational, Non-interventional Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Anti-TNF (Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor) Alpha Therapy With Certolizumab Pegol Observed in Daily Practice in Adult Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Patients

This is an observational, non-interventional, non-comparative, post-authorization safety study to evaluate efficacy and long-term safety of Cimzia in adult patients with RA in need of treatment with a biological product.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

The purpose of this study is to assess the clinical efficacy of Cimzia in achieving clinical remission after two years of therapy. The observational nature of the study leaves the therapeutic decision exclusively within the discretion of the treating physician.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

1117

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Altenburg, Germany
        • 174
      • Amberg, Germany
        • 70
      • Attendorn, Germany
        • 122
      • Augsburg, Germany
        • 153
      • Bad Aibling, Germany
        • 3
      • Bad Bramstedt, Germany
        • 133
      • Bad Buchau, Germany
        • 167
      • Bad Doberan, Germany
        • 20
      • Bad Endbach, Germany
        • 166
      • Bad Iburg, Germany
        • 8
      • Bad Kissingen, Germany
        • 66
      • Bad Kreuznach, Germany
        • 137
      • Bad Liebenwerda, Germany
        • 119
      • Bad Nauheim, Germany
        • 4
      • Bad Neuenahr-Ahrweiler, Germany
        • 13
      • Bad Staffelstein, Germany
        • 87
      • Baden Baden, Germany
        • 173
      • Bamberg, Germany
        • 19
      • Bautzen, Germany
        • 115
      • Bayreuth, Germany
        • 21
      • Bayreuth, Germany
        • 58
      • Berlin, Germany
        • 163
      • Berlin, Germany
        • 43
      • Berlin, Germany
        • 12
      • Berlin, Germany
        • 25
      • Berlin, Germany
        • 1
      • Berlin, Germany
        • 112
      • Berlin, Germany
        • 179
      • Berlin, Germany
        • 26
      • Berlin, Germany
        • 54
      • Berlin, Germany
        • 59
      • Berlin, Germany
        • 61
      • Berlin, Germany
        • 72
      • Berlin, Germany
        • 78
      • Berlin, Germany
        • 91
      • Berlin, Germany
        • 95
      • Chemnitz, Germany
        • 28
      • Chemnitz, Germany
        • 75
      • Darmstadt, Germany
        • 134
      • Darmstadt, Germany
        • 71
      • Deggendorf, Germany
        • 125
      • Dresden, Germany
        • 131
      • Dresden, Germany
        • 36
      • Dresden, Germany
        • 88
      • Dresden, Germany
        • 98
      • Duisburg, Germany
        • 49
      • Düsseldorf, Germany
        • 46
      • Elmshorn, Germany
        • 102
      • Erfurt, Germany
        • 83
      • Erlangen, Germany
        • 2
      • Essen, Germany
        • 37
      • Essen, Germany
        • 84
      • Frankenberg-Sachsen, Germany
        • 136
      • Frankfurt, Germany
        • 103
      • Frankfurt, Germany
        • 53
      • Freiberg, Germany
        • 29
      • Freiburg, Germany
        • 86
      • Fulda, Germany
        • 77
      • Goslar, Germany
        • 15
      • Greifswald, Germany
        • 135
      • Gräfelfing, Germany
        • 89
      • Guestrow, Germany
        • 107
      • Göttingen, Germany
        • 100
      • Hagen, Germany
        • 157
      • Haldensleben, Germany
        • 150
      • Halle, Germany
        • 11
      • Hamburg, Germany
        • 116
      • Hamburg, Germany
        • 128
      • Hamburg, Germany
        • 139
      • Hamburg, Germany
        • 175
      • Hamburg, Germany
        • 50
      • Hamburg, Germany
        • 55
      • Hamburg, Germany
        • 67
      • Hamburg, Germany
        • 6
      • Hanau, Germany
        • 129
      • Hannover, Germany
        • 159
      • Hannover, Germany
        • 171
      • Hannover, Germany
        • 17
      • Heidelberg, Germany
        • 138
      • Heidelberg, Germany
        • 146
      • Heidelberg, Germany
        • 47
      • Heilbad Heiligenstadt, Germany
        • 92
      • Herrsching, Germany
        • 64
      • Hildesheim, Germany
        • 5
      • Hofheim, Germany
        • 30
      • Hoyerswerda, Germany
        • 48
      • Karlsruhe, Germany
        • 130
      • Karlsruhe, Germany
        • 56
      • Karlsruhe, Germany
        • 96
      • Karlstadt, Germany
        • 101
      • Kassel, Germany
        • 121
      • Katzhuette, Germany
        • 161
      • Kiel, Germany
        • 158
      • Köln, Germany
        • 16
      • Köln, Germany
        • 73
      • Köln, Germany
        • 97
      • Leipzig, Germany
        • 127
      • Ludwigsfelde, Germany
        • 51
      • Ludwigslust, Germany
        • 140
      • Lübeck, Germany
        • 93
      • Magdeburg, Germany
        • 68
      • Mainz, Germany
        • 145
      • Marktredwitz, Germany
        • 31
      • Mittelherwigsdorf, Germany
        • 94
      • Mönchengladbach, Germany
        • 18
      • Mühlheim an der Ruhr, Germany
        • 104
      • München, Germany
        • 10
      • München, Germany
        • 164
      • München, Germany
        • 178
      • München, Germany
        • 9
      • Münster, Germany
        • 113
      • Münster, Germany
        • 123
      • Naunhof, Germany
        • 57
      • Neubrandenburg, Germany
        • 32
      • Neuburg, Germany
        • 108
      • Neuruppin, Germany
        • 149
      • Neuss, Germany
        • 44
      • Nienburg, Germany
        • 7
      • Norderstedt, Germany
        • 141
      • Nürnberg, Germany
        • 172
      • Nürnberg, Germany
        • 22
      • Oberammergau, Germany
        • 99
      • Oberhausen, Germany
        • 23
      • Offenburg, Germany
        • 33
      • Osnabrück, Germany
        • 38
      • Paderborn, Germany
        • 154
      • Pirna, Germany
        • 34
      • Planegg, Germany
        • 81
      • Plauen, Germany
        • 85
      • Potsdam, Germany
        • 27
      • Potsdam, Germany
        • 35
      • Ratingen, Germany
        • 24
      • Rendsburg, Germany
        • 82
      • Rheine, Germany
        • 124
      • Rostock, Germany
        • 109
      • Rostock, Germany
        • 76
      • Rüdersdorf, Germany
        • 90
      • Saarbrücken, Germany
        • 39
      • Salzwedel, Germany
        • 69
      • Schramberg-Sulgen, Germany
        • 117
      • Schwerin, Germany
        • 143
      • Schwerte, Germany
        • 142
      • Seesen, Germany
        • 120
      • Stadtbergen, Germany
        • 105
      • Stuttgart, Germany
        • 14
      • Stuttgart, Germany
        • 40
      • Traunstein, Germany
        • 160
      • Treuenbrietzen, Germany
        • 170
      • Tübingen, Germany
        • 41
      • Uffenheim, Germany
        • 168
      • Ulm, Germany
        • 111
      • Ulm, Germany
        • 65
      • Villingen-Schwenningen, Germany
        • 52
      • Weener, Germany
        • 106
      • Weiden, Germany
        • 162
      • Weißenfels, Germany
        • 177
      • Wiesbaden, Germany
        • 118
      • Wiesbaden, Germany
        • 74
      • Winsen, Germany
        • 60
      • Würselen, Germany
        • 165
      • Würzburg, Germany
        • 152
      • Zeven, Germany
        • 110
      • Zwiesel, Germany
        • 45

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Male or female ≥ 18 years of age with RA and is eligible for treatment with Cimzia. Recruited in Germany.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients eligible for treatment with Cimzia as defined in EU approved SmPC

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient previously treated with Cimzia. Patient with known hypersensitivity to any component of Cimzia

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Cimzia
All patients will be treated with Cimzia according to normal clinical practice for the prescribing physician and as defined by the SmPC

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical Remission at Visit 9 (Around Week 104) Measured by Achieving a Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) of < 2.6
Time Frame: From Baseline to Visit 9 (around Week 104)

The DAS28 was calculated using the tender and swollen joint counts, c-reactive Protein (CRP), or erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and the Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PtGADA). The joint assessment was carried out on 28 joints.

For the analysis, DAS28 values were categorized into the following groups:

  • DAS28 < 2.6: clinical remission
  • DAS28 from 2.6 to ≤ 3.2: low disease activity
  • DAS28 from > 3.2 to 5.1: moderate disease activity
  • DAS28 > 5.1: high disease activity
From Baseline to Visit 9 (around Week 104)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline to Visit 9 (Around Week 104) in Patients's Arthritis Pain as Measured by Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain (PAAP) Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: From Baseline to Visit 9 (around Week 104)
Patients rated how much pain they were experiencing at the time of the visit caused by their Arthritis using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ranging from 0 (no pain) to 100 (most severe pain). A negative value in Change from Baseline indicates an improvement from Baseline to Visit 9 (around Week 104).
From Baseline to Visit 9 (around Week 104)
Change From Baseline to Visit 9 (Around Week 104) in Patient's Physical Function as Measured by the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI)
Time Frame: From Baseline to Visit 9 (around Week 104)
The HAQ-DI contains 20 items on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (without any difficulty) to 3 (unable to do). The 20 items are grouped in 8 categories with 2 to 3 items each. The category scores are averaged into an overall HAQ-DI from 0 to 3. Scores of 0 to 1 generally represent mild to moderate difficulty, 1 to 2 represent moderate to severe disability, and 2 to 3 indicate severe to very severe disability. A negative value in Change from Baseline indicates an improvement from Baseline to Visit 9 (around Week 104).
From Baseline to Visit 9 (around Week 104)
Change From Baseline to Visit 9 (Around Week 104) in Disease Activity Measured by Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI)
Time Frame: From Baseline to Visit 9 (around Week 104)

The CDAI was calculated with the equation:

CDAI= Tender Joint Count + Swollen Joint Count + PtGADA/10 + PhGADA/10 where PtGADA (mm) is the Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ranging from 0 to 100, and PhGADA (mm) is the Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity using a VAS ranging from 0 to 100. Thus, the CDAI ranges from 0 to 76, with higher values indicating higher disease activity. If any individual term was missing, then the CDAI was set to missing. A negative value in Change from Baseline indicates an improvement from Baseline to Visit 9 (around Week 104).

From Baseline to Visit 9 (around Week 104)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 15, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 15, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

February 17, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

October 29, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 6, 2015

Last Verified

October 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rheumatoid Arthritis

3
Subscribe