Control of MRSA in Nursing Homes: Decolonization vs Standard Precautions

March 26, 2020 updated by: Bellini Cristina, University of Lausanne Hospitals

Universal Screening and Decolonization vs Standard Precautions for Control of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) in Nursing Homes: a Cluster, Randomised Controlled Study.

The purpose of this study is to determine the better approach between the currently procedure (i.e. standards precautions) and a reinforced strategy to control MRSA transmission in the institutionalized population of nursing homes in Canton of Vaud, Switzerland.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

MRSA carriage among nursing homes residents of Canton Vaud, Switzerland, is increasing, despite use of standard precautions. Recommendation to prevent MRSA transmission in long term care facilities are lacking. We aim to reinforce the current infection control strategy by general MRSA screening of institutionalised residents and decolonisation of MRSA carriers. Because the uncertainties in the impact of this reinforced strategy, we aim to compare this action to the policy actually applied.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

157

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • all nursing homes of canton Vaud, Switzerland, that give the consent of participation

Exclusion Criteria:

- refusal to participate

Inclusion criteria for decolonisation in intervention nursing homes:

- all MRSA positive residents living in a Nursing Home included in the intervention group

Exclusion Criteria for decolonisation:

  • residents that refuse to be screened or refused the decolonisation
  • life expectancy shorter of 7 days
  • known intolerance of disinfectant/ topical antibiotics used in the protocol
  • active MRSA infection
  • asymptomatic MRSA bacteriuria
  • stage IV wound (according to National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: PREVENTION
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
NO_INTERVENTION: Standard Precautions
control arm, standards precautions for all residents living in the nursing home of control arm, including MRSA carriers
OTHER: Intervention
Intervention arm, standards precautions for all residents living in nursing homes of intervention arm, and topical decolonization for MRSA carriers, including environmental disinfection

5 days topical decolonisation including nasal mupirocin tid, chlorhexidine mouth wash tid, chlorhexidine body wash once daily.

Daily direct resident's environmental disinfection during decolonisation.

Other Names:
  • topical MRSA decolonisation and environmental disinfection

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To determine the change in prevalence of MRSA carriage among residents of each Nursing homes group at the end of the one study year
Time Frame: 1 year
in each control and intervention nursing home: MRSA screening of all residents of nursing homes of Canton Vaud, at baseline and 1 year later, in order to compare MRSA prevalence changes at nursing homes levels
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To determine the effectiveness of the reinforced strategy to prevent MRSA infection, compared to the standard strategy
Time Frame: 1 year
In a subpopulation of all nursing homes residents (10% of the whole population), recording of all microbiologically documented MRSA infection, according to nosocomial infection definitions of the Center of Diseases Control (CDC) of Atlanta.
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Giorgio Zanetti, MD, University Hospital of Lausanne, Switzerland

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2010

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

December 1, 2011

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

December 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 4, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 4, 2010

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

June 7, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

March 30, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 26, 2020

Last Verified

March 1, 2020

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus

Clinical Trials on intervention

3
Subscribe