Plasma Utilization Following Cardiac Surgery (PUCS)

May 22, 2012 updated by: Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

In Canada, 218,000 units of fresh frozen plasma and frozen plasma were transfused in 2005.Cardiac surgery patients are the largest recipient group for FP transfusions. Despite this, no studies have characterized the use of FP in relation to coagulation test abnormalities or bleeding, or how these and other clinical determinants influence the decision to transfuse FP. Furthermore, no studies have evaluated the effectiveness of FP transfusions in correcting laboratory abnormalities or treating bleeding in cardiac surgery.

Given the varied use of FP transfusions in cardiac surgery, further studies are essential.In order to improve current utilization of FP, current use must be understood, and the relationship between FP transfusions and the clinical factors that affect the decision to transfuse FP.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study will examine (1) the utilization pattern in the use of FP transfusions, (2) the clinical determinants influencing physician's decision to transfuse and blood loss and (3) coagulation tests in individual cardiac surgery patients. Through greater understanding of the current use of FP in cardiovascular surgery, we can improve its utilization and reduce unnecessary and harmful exposure to blood products.

Objectives: We will describe the incidence and clinical determinants of FP transfusions in cardiac surgery. Secondarily, we will evaluate the relationships between the utilization of FP transfusions and (1) blood loss and (2) coagulation test results.

Methods: All FP transfusions given to cardiac surgery patients intra and postoperatively in the intensive care unit will be reviewed. At the time of the transfusion (intraop) or request (postop) for FP all physicians will complete a short questionnaire evaluating the clinical factors influencing their decision to transfuse. For a sample of postoperative patients with elevated an INR who are not transfused FP, we will have physicians complete a similar short questionnaire evaluating the same clinical factors. Charts of all cardiac surgery patients will be reviewed to capture baseline, intraoperative and postoperative data including demographics, transfusions, blood loss and laboratory results. Charts of patients with INR > 1.2 and/or receiving FP will be reviewed in detail to collect baseline data, intraoperative data, and detailed post operative data including FP transfusions, other blood transfusions, blood loss, lab and coagulation results, and adverse transfusion reactions. Data will collected for duration of stay in intensive care.

Outcomes: The primary outcomes are the (i) the proportion of patients transfused FP and the dose of FP transfused and (2) the importance the clinical determinants influencing the decision to transfuse FP. Secondary outcomes include measures of blood loss (mediastinal chest tube blood loss, change in hemoglobin and number of red blood cell transfusions), changes in coagulation tests results (INR, PTT), the frequency of adverse transfusion reactions, length of ICU and hospital stay, and mortality.

Analysis: The primary analysis will be a descriptive analysis of FP transfusions and the clinical determinants influencing the decision to transfuse FP. A multivariable logistic regression analysis will be performed to examine the variables associated with FP utilization including the postoperative IN, hemoglobin, red cell transfusions and mediastinal chest tube loss in patients transfused FP. The correlation between the physician reported clinical determinants for FP transfusions and blood loss and coagulation test results will be examined by Spearman and Pearson correlations as appropriate , and multiple logistic regression. For the analysis of secondary outcomes, the mean change in blood loss and coagulation test results following FP transfusion will be calculated, and a multivariable regression analysis will be performed to examine the relationship between blood loss, FP transfusions and changes in the INR.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

970

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1H 8L6
        • Ottawa Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients at six 6 Canadian Centres

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

*All subjects undergoing Cardiopulmonary Bypass surgery

More detailed Data Collection for subjects:

  • who either receive at least one Frozen Plasma Transfusion or
  • who have an INR > 1.2 in the 72 hours following surgery and
  • are admitted to an intensive care unit.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • No subjects undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass surgery will be excluded

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of Frozen Plasma Transfusion
Time Frame: 1 month
For FP Transfusions, we will determine the proportion of patients transfused FP for (a) all cardiac surgery patients, (b) for patients with an INR> 1.2, (c) for patients with an INR > 1.5 and (d) for patients with no recent coagulation tests available. We will also determine the number of units and volume (mL/kg) for each transfusion order and the total number of units and volume (mL/kg) transfused in addition to the timing of all units transfused in the first 72 hours after cardiac surgery.
1 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical determinants influencing the decision to transfuse
Time Frame: 1 month
We will examine seven clinical determinants that may influence the decision to transfuse: (1) change in hemoglobin, (2) ongoing chest tube blood loss, (3) potential future blood loss, (4) INR/PT results, (5) aPTT results, (6) hemodynamic instability, (7) hemodilution. We will capture the importance of these factors using a visual analog scale. The same seven clinical determinants will be examined for patients with an elevated INR who are not transfused FP
1 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Alan T Tinmouth, MD MSc, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 20, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 23, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

August 24, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 23, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 22, 2012

Last Verified

May 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cardiac Surgical Procedures

3
Subscribe