Hematological Infection Score Compared to the Hospital Standard for Diagnosis of SIRS or Sepsis on ICU

January 3, 2012 updated by: Claudia Spies, Charite University, Berlin, Germany

Hematological Infection Profile (ICIS/ICPS) Compared to Actual Best Hospital Practice for Differentiation of SIRS and Sepsis and Management of Antiinfective Therapy in ICU Patients

CRP and PCT are not valid parameters of early infection in particularly postoperative patients. (Sanders et al., A&A, June 2006, Vol.102; Katja et al., Shock, February 2001, Vol 15.2) Better detection systems for SIRS and sepsis are urgently required.

ICIS® (Sysmex intensive care infection score) and ICPS® (Sysmex intensive care prognostic score) are two new score-systems depending on detectable cellular response of the innate immune system in human peripheral blood.

The purpose of this observational study is to determine if these scores are superior in early differentiation between non-infectious SIRS and infectious SIRS (sepsis) in postoperative patients. Furthermore, the applicability of the scores for triggering start and ending of anti-infective therapy will be examined.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

207

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Berlin, Germany, 13353
        • Department of Anesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care Medicine Campus Virchow-Klinikum

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All IC department patients (WAN 8i, WAN 14i and WNC S1i Charite Berlin) will be enrolled in the study.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • all ICU patients age > 18 years
  • more than 36h on ICU

Exclusion Criteria:

  • ICU patients age < 18 years
  • less than 36h on ICU

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
ICU patients
ICU patients (post-operative and none operative patients) will be enrolled in the study. They are followed up until the end of ICU stay or, for a maximum of 60 days.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The primary objective of this study performed according to an observational post-ad-hoc design is to show that the two Sysmex infection scores provide a better performance than CRP & PCT for infection processes thus providing an efficient alternative.
Time Frame: a period of 60 days
Approximately 200 patients will be enrolled in the study. They are followed up until the end of ICU stay or, for a maximum of 60 days. Usually in clinical routine, patients suspected to have an infection process, receive once per day a "full infectiology profile". It consists of CRP, PCT and the Sysmex infection profiles (ICIS/ICPS).
a period of 60 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The second objective is to investigate whether ICIS® and ICPS® could assist in faster antiinfective regim decisions than CRP & PCT.
Time Frame: a period of 60 day
Approximately 200 patients will be enrolled in the study. They are followed up until the end of ICU stay or, for a maximum of 60 days. Usually in clinical routine, patients suspected to have an infection process, receive once per day a "full infectiology profile". It consists of CRP, PCT and the Sysmex infection profiles (ICIS/ICPS).
a period of 60 day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2010

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

May 1, 2010

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

October 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 8, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 8, 2010

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

November 9, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

January 5, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 3, 2012

Last Verified

January 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sepsis

3
Subscribe