Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation in Relation to Central Sensitization in Osteoarthritis of the Knee (TENSSENS)

July 6, 2011 updated by: Vrije Universiteit Brussel

Effect of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation in Relation to Central Sensitization in Patients With Osteoarthritis of the Knee: a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Background

Central sensitization has recently been documented in patients with knee osteoarthritis. So far, the presence of central sensitization has not been considered as a confounding factor in studies assessing the pain inhibitory effect of TENS on osteoarthritis of the knee.

Purpose

First, to explore the pain inhibitory effect of burst TENS in OAk patients. Second, to explore the prognostic value of central sensitization on the pain inhibitory effect of TENS in Oak patients.

Methods

Patients with knee pain due to OAk will be recruited through advertisements in local media. Temporal summation, before and after a heterotopic noxious conditioning stimulation, will be measured. In addition, pain on a numeric rating score and WOMAC subscores for pain and function will be assessed. Patients will be randomly allocated to one of two treatment groups (TENS, sham TENS). Follow-up measurements will be scheduled after a period of 6 and 12 weeks.

Discussion/ conclusion

TENS influences pain through the electrical stimulation of low-threshold A-beta cutaneous fibers. The responsiveness of central pain-signaling neurons of OAk patients who are centrally sensitized may be augmented to the input of these electrical stimuli. This would encompass an adverse therapy effect of TENS. Therefore it might be interesting to identify a subgroup of symptomatic OAk patients, ie. non-sensitized patients, who are likely to benefit from burst TENS.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

98

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • To be included, patients need to be over 50 years old.
  • All should have osteoarthritis in at least one knee fulfilling the American College of Rheumatology classification criteria and report peak knee pain over the last 24 h of more than 3 on a Numeric Rating Score (0-10 scale).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients are excluded if they have had a knee surgery or intra-articular corticosteroid injection within 6 months
  • Current or past (within 4 weeks) oral corticosteroid use
  • A history of knee joint replacement or tibial osteotomy
  • Contraindications to burst TENS (pacemakers, epilepsy, dermatological conditions, abnormal sensation in the knees, pregnancy) or if they are unable to apply TENS independently

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: TENS
The subjects that enter the TENS-group will be asked to apply the TENS therapy for at least 40 minutes continuously per day. The parameters of the current will not be changed during the study (pulse: 250 µsec; internal frequency: 100Hz; burst frequency 3 Hz; intensity: until an unpleasant but not painful sensation is acquired).
Sham Comparator: Sham TENS
The patients that are assigned to the sham TENS will receive an inactive placebo TENS therapy using a nonfunctional unit that appears to work but provides no stimulus.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall average knee pain
Time Frame: after 6 and 12 weeks
numeric rating score
after 6 and 12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change from baseline in self reported knee pain and difficulty with physical function (WOMAC)
Time Frame: baseline - 6 weeks
baseline - 6 weeks
Change from baseline in self reported knee pain and difficulty with physical function (WOMAC)
Time Frame: baseline - 12 weeks
baseline - 12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

March 1, 2013

Study Completion (Anticipated)

March 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 13, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 6, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

July 11, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

July 11, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 6, 2011

Last Verified

April 1, 2011

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Tenssens

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Osteoarthritis, Knee

Clinical Trials on Transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation

3
Subscribe