Eyelid Warming Technology for Meibomian Gland Dysfunction

Eyelid Warming Technology for Relief of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction in an Asian Population

Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD), an extremely common clinical condition (seen in more than half of some Asian populations), affects the lipid producing meibomian glands in the eyelids. One function of the glandular secretions is to reduce evaporation of the tear film. In MGD the meibomian glands may become blocked for various reasons. The consequential retention and stasis of the secretion increases immune response as well as scarring response. This eventually results in an abnormal tear film and dry eye symptoms.

The current standard treatments include warm moist compresses, regular lid hygiene, oral antibiotics, topical antibiotic ointments and Omega 3 supplementation. Heating for an extended duration is important because it relieves the occlusion of blocked meibomian glands. However, improvised methods of heating are cumbersome and inefficient requiring repeated measures, often leading to lack of compliance. Today, there is a wider range of commercially available devices that help to unblock meibomian glands and relief dry eye symptoms. These devices may improve MGD treatment dramatically, but have not been tested in the warm climate of Singapore, and are not readily available.

The current study aims to test the efficacy of treatment for devices that utilize A) warm moisture (Blephasteam) and B) warmth (EyeGiene) in patients suffering from meibomian gland dysfunction. Patients will be asked to use Blephasteam and EyeGiene for a period of 4 weeks. The study will monitor patients for changes in tear film and lipid composition, as well as changes in the anatomy of meibomian glands. Additionally, dry eye symptoms will be documented in form of questionnaires. If the newer methods of managing MGD are found to be efficacious and safe, these treatment measures can be made available to patients in Singapore.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Meibomian Gland Dysfunction
• Intervention / Treatment: Device: EyeGiene; Device: Blephasteam; Device: Hot compresses

Detailed Description

Study Objectives and Purpose:

1. A primary purpose of the study is to compare the efficacy of novel eyelid warming devices (Blephasteam and EyeGiene) for treatment of meibomian gland dysfunction by objective clinical scoring and objective assessment of ocular surface parameters in an Asian population.
2. The second aim is to assess the patient acceptance of these modalities, in terms of comfort and convenience.
3. A third aim of the study is to document Meibomian gland disease using non-invasive Meibography, and the possible alterations of this condition after treatment.

Study Design: Prospective, controlled, single masked, interventional study

Rationale:

Meibomian gland dysfunction and resulting evaporative dry eye is highly common in our general population. Behavioral factors and environmental stress may contribute to the severity of the disease. Eyelid warming devices have the potential to significantly improve meibomian gland health and alleviate dry eye symptoms associated with the disease. Currently eyelid warming devices suitable for treatment of meibomian gland dysfunction are not available in Singapore.

Recent technological advances, as well as the infrastructure of the Singapore Eye Research Institute (proximity to Singapore National Eye Center and pre-existing facility and infrastructure for clinical trials) have facilitated studies of products that are available elsewhere and may benefit the Singaporean population.

Methods:

Participants and target sample size Seventy-five patients from the dry eye clinic in the Singapore National Eye Center who have obstructive meibomian gland dysfunction and are keen to test alternative ways for treating the disease will be selected.

Randomisation is done by randomisation table as deemed appropriate by the statistician collaborator.

Treatment regime After informed written consent, patients will be randomly assigned to a group.

1. Control group, 10-minute treatment, twice daily
2. Blephasteam, 10-minute treatment, twice daily
3. EyeGiene, 10-minute treatment, twice daily

All patients are permitted to continue their regular management of MGD such as use of lid scrubs or lid hygiene preparations (such as Lidcare and Blephagel). For consistency, the investigators will monitor the use of such measures in a daily diary and prohibit any other types of treatment for MGD such as Omega-3 tablets, antibiotic or steroid ointments, probing of MG.

Visit schedules Screening visit will be performed at the regular dry eye clinic. If eligible, patients will sign consent and undergo baseline examination.

Subsequent to this, the follow up visit will be after 4 weeks of treatment. A window period of

+/-3days is permitted for this visit.

Duration of study:

Four weeks.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 75
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• Singapore
  • Singapore, Singapore, 168751
    • Singapore National Eye Centre/ Singapore Eye Research Institute

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 21 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Eyelids must present with blocked meibomian gland openings (plugs), at least 1 visible MG plug in the 4 eyelids, or discernable change in consistency of meibum when MG expressed in upper or lower eyelids.
• At least one out of 8 questions on dry eye symptoms is answered with often or all the time (Appendix C, Questionnaire modified after Schein et al.,1997).
• Eyes should not show any other ocular surface pathology which required more treatment than eye lubricant and conventional eyelid hygiene.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Known history of thyroid disorders (diagnosed by physician).
• No ocular surgery within the previous 6 months and LASIK within the previous 1 year.
• Any intake of central nervous system and hormonal drugs within last 30 days and inability to withhold such drugs for at least 6 weeks.
• Active ocular infection or pterygium.
• Anticipated necessity to wear contact lens in the duration of the study.
• Living in the same household as another participant of the study.
• Any other specified reason as determined by clinical investigator, for example, the need to use any treatment or eyedrops (eg. Restasis) not permitted by the study.

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: Single

Number of Arms

3

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: EyeGiene; EyeGiene (Eyedetec Medical Inc., US) is a self-contained, convenient warm compress system for the eyes. The system is composed of a reusable eye mask and one time use warmers that are inserted into the eye mask. The warming units are activated by squeezing just prior use and deliver 40°C heat for up to 5 minutes within 30-60 seconds.	Device: EyeGiene; 10 minute treatment, twice daily; Other Names: Eyedetec Medical Inc., US
Active Comparator: Blephasteam; Blephasteam (Spectrum Théa, France) is an eyelid warming device that can be conveniently used at home. The goggles provide standardised heat of about 38 degrees to liquefy lipids and also humidify the chambers with mineral water to ensure optimal moisture levels.	Device: Blephasteam; 10 minute treatment twice daily; Other Names: Spectrum Théa, France
Placebo Comparator: Control- Hot Compress; The participants in this group will be using warm compresses with a hot towel.	Device: Hot compresses; 10 minute treatment, twice daily

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Dry Eye Symptoms	A VAS will be applied to evaluate dry eye symptoms as described by Schaumberg et al. (Schaumberg 2007)between baseline and week 4. The scores will be recorded separately for frequency and severity of dry eye symptoms.	Week 4

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Tear film break up time	After instillation of fluorescein, the participant will be asked to open the eyes, look ahead at the observer's forehead and not blink for as long as possible. The break up time is defined as the time between the lid opening and the first appearance of any dry spot on the cornea. The participant will be requested to close his eyes for few seconds and the procedure will be repeated for the left eye. The tear film break up time will be compared between baseline and week 4.	Week 4
Number of plugs	The number of blocked/plugged meibomian glands will be counted in each eyelid and any improvement in comparison to baseline assessed.	Week 4
Yamaguchi Score	The severity of meibomian gland dysfunction will be assessed at baseline and week 4.	Week 4
Corneal Staining	The corneal staining will be assessed using fluorescein. The cornea will be divided into 5 sectors. The staining will be assessed at baseline and week 4.	Week 4
Schirmer's Test	The tear production will be assessed using Schirmer Test I. Improvements in tear production will be identified in comparison to baseline.	Week 4
Meibography	The meibomian glands will be imaged using infrared photography and their health graded at baseline and week 4.	Week 4
Tear meniscus volume	The tear meniscus (height of the tear film) will be imaged and measured using the Anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT). Briefly, the participant will be asked to look at a target in the instrument while blinking normally. The OCT will then scan the ocular surface and images of the upper and lower tear meniscus will be captured. Any changes in tear volume will be assessed with comparison to baseline values.	Week 4
Meibomian gland lipids	The meibum from patients will be collected using a Kimura Platinum spatula and the lipid components will be analysed using mass-spectrometry. Lipid compositions will be compared between baseline and week 4 visits.	Week 4
Tear composition	The Schirmer test strips will be collected and the tears analysed for protein and lipid changes at baseline and after 4 weeks of treatment.	Week 4

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Singapore National Eye Centre
• Collaborators: National University, Singapore; Singapore Eye Research Institute

Publications and helpful links

General Publications

• Lin PY, Tsai SY, Cheng CY, Liu JH, Chou P, Hsu WM. Prevalence of dry eye among an elderly Chinese population in Taiwan: the Shihpai Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 2003 Jun;110(6):1096-101. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00262-8.
• Foulks GN, Borchman D. Meibomian gland dysfunction: the past, present, and future. Eye Contact Lens. 2010 Sep;36(5):249-53. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0b013e3181ef0d37.
• Yeo S, Tan JH, Acharya UR, Sudarshan VK, Tong L. Longitudinal Changes in Tear Evaporation Rates After Eyelid Warming Therapies in Meibomian Gland Dysfunction. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016 Apr 1;57(4):1974-81. doi: 10.1167/iovs.16-19088.

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start: December 1, 2011
• Primary Completion (Actual): December 1, 2013
• Study Completion (Actual): December 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: October 4, 2011
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: October 6, 2011
• First Posted (Estimate): October 7, 2011

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Estimate): June 10, 2014
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: June 9, 2014
• Last Verified: June 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: meibomian gland dysfunction; hot compress; eyelid warming; meibum
• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Eye Diseases; Eyelid Diseases; Meibomian Gland Dysfunction
• Other Study ID Numbers: R815/10/2011; 2011/197/A (OTHER: Singhealth Centralised Institutional Review Board)