Examinations of Tissue From Ablated Malignant Liver Metastases as Predictors of Outcome

April 15, 2024 updated by: Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

The purpose of this study is to see if the investigators can do some tests on tissue from the area of the ablation. The investigators want to know if a test can help predict whether the ablation worked.

The treated tumor is normally evaluated with CT. The CT shows signs of treated tumor(s) in the area treated by ablation. However, cancer cells may begin to grow in or near the treated area. The CT scan cannot tell us if the cells are new cancer cells or if they are healthy liver cells that just look different because of the ablation. The test the investigators will study should be able to tell us the difference.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

160

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Katia Manova, PhD
  • Phone Number: 646-888-2173

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Constantinos Sofocleous, MD
  • Phone Number: 212-639-3379

Study Locations

    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10065
        • Recruiting
        • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
        • Contact:
          • Katia Manova, PhD
          • Phone Number: 646-888-2173
        • Contact:
          • Constantinos Sofocleous, MD
          • Phone Number: 212-639-3379
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Constantinos Sofocleous, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with diagnosed with secondary hepatic malignancy;
  • Patients with confined liver disease or stable limited extrahepatic disease;
  • Lesions of 5cm or less in maximum diameter;
  • Patients who are not surgical candidates or refuse to undergo surgery and choose any percutaneous ablation as an alternative treatment option.
  • INR<1.5 *for patients on Coumadin general clinical guidelines for IR ablation will be followed.
  • Platelet count > or = to 50,000

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients < 18
  • Less than 5 mm distance of the tumor margin from a major vessel >7mm in diameter)**
  • Less than 5 mm distance to a structure (GI or biliary tract), that cannot be protected from**
  • the ablation injury with technical modifications such as hydro or air dissection.
  • INR > 1.5 that cannot be corrected with fresh frozen Plasma*
  • Platelet count of <50,000 that cannot be corrected with transfusion.
  • Patient with more than 3 tumors treated with any percutaneous ablation
  • Patients with more than 5 sites of extrahepatic disease (including nodes and pulmonary nodules)

    • for patients on Coumadin general clinical guidelines for IR ablation will be followed **This will not be considered an exclusion criteria when IRE or Microwave is used.

      • This will not be considered exclusion when IRE is used

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: CT guided percutaneous ablation
The selected patients will undergo CT guided percutaneous ablation. The use of multi-tined electrode is encouraged, unless tumor location requires the use of an internally cooled needle electrode to eliminate injury to an adjacent vital structure or the operator prefers to use an internally cooled electrode for a specific reason.
Depending on tumor size and location, we will direct a core biopsy needle in the ablated tumor using post-ablation dynamic Liver CT guidance, preferably including liver triphasic examination. The obtained tissue will be detached, collected and submitted to our molecular cytology laboratory. All specimens will be submitted fresh to our molecular cytology laboratory for immediate analysis in order to classify them as viable tumor (V) or apoptotic cells/coagulation necrosis (CN). CT will be performed within 24 hours of the ablation to demonstrate the ablation defect, representing the area of coagulation necrosis. This CT will be used for targeting the ablated tumor for biopsy. All patients will undergo CT again, approximately within 4-8 weeks (+/- 2 weeks) of percutaneous ablation to evaluate for CN in the target tumor or any sign of residual tissue enhancement, representing incomplete treatment.
Other Names:
  • Follow-up will continue at approximate 2-4 months intervals (+/- 2 weeks) with CT, to evaluate for local tumor progression (LTP) for the following 3 years.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Tumor response
Time Frame: 3 years
will be measured according to EASL and RECIST. In the case of differences between these criteria, the EASL criteria will be used for clinical judgment and decisions.Tumor response will be determined at the discretion of the Principal Investigator in the case of overlapping ablation zones or lesions seen only in PET.
3 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Duration of treatment response
Time Frame: 3 years
will be measured as the time from the date of first objective response until the first measurement of progression as determined by the central readers using the EASL criteria. Dynamic Liver CT scans, preferably including the liver triphasic examination will be conducted at each follow-up visit until progression.
3 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Constantinos Sofocleous, MD, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 27, 2009

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 13, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 14, 2011

First Posted (Estimated)

December 19, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 16, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 15, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Liver Cancer

Clinical Trials on CT guided percutaneous ablation

3
Subscribe