Winged Perimeter Versus Traditional Plastic Biliary Stent for Malignant Bile Duct Obstruction

April 30, 2018 updated by: Jennifer Telford, University of British Columbia

A Randomized Trial Comparing a Winged Perimeter Stent and Traditional Polyethylene Plastic Stent in the Management of Malignant Distal Biliary Strictures

Strictures in the bile duct cause a blockage of flow of bile. This leads to potential problems including jaundice, itch and infection in the bile duct. The usual first step in this situation would be to allow flow of bile by placing a stent across the stricture. This is usually done by a special type of endoscopy procedure called an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, or ERCP.

The most commonly used stent are made from a plastic material called polyethylene and has a central lumen in which bile drains through it. Health Canada has approved the sale and use of another stent with a winged perimeter (the VIADUCT stent) for placement in bile duct strictures and is used routinely in our hospitals. However, the investigators do not know which stent is better at treating bile duct strictures. In order to determine which stent would be more useful, the VIADUCT stent and the usual polyethylene flanged stent must be studied under carefully controlled circumstances. This will be done by a randomized, subject-blinded study. Other trials in the past have looked at other stents in this way, but this is the first time the VIADUCT stent has been looked at in this manner. The investigators suspect that the design of the VIADUCT stent will allow it to work for a longer period of time compared to the traditional polyethylene stent.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Biliary obstruction usually presents with jaundice, pruritis, cholangitis, and steatorrhoea. Strictures which are a common cause of biliary obstruction, may be secondary to benign or malignant conditions. Common benign conditions include chronic pancreatitis, primary sclerosing cholangitis, autoimmune pancreatitis, prior surgery and recurrent pyogenic cholangitis. Cholangiocarcinomas, ampullary and pancreatic tumours are more common causes of malignant biliary obstruction.

The principles of managing biliary strictures are to determine the underlying cause of the stricture, whilst achieving drainage of the biliary tree, initially with the placement of a plastic stent via an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Strictures are sampled using biliary brush cytology and/or biliary biopsy to assess for underlying malignancy. Malignant strictures are usually staged for resectability with computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and/or endoscopic ultrasound (EUS).

The Viaduct stent (GI Supply, Camp Hill, Pennsylvania, USA) is a unique stent design and has a winged perimeter, which channels flow of bile around the stent, rather than through a central lumen. Theoretically this may enhance flow and biliary drainage, and prevent obstruction. Both polyethylene and Viaduct plastic stents are approved for use by Health Canada for benign and malignant biliary conditions. It is not known whether one stent is superior to the other in maintaining symptomatic relief from bile duct strictures as there have been no studies to date comparing the two stents.

There is limited published data on the Viaduct stent. A pilot study of the winged stent design was published in 2006. Five patients had winged stents inserted and followed for 2 weeks. The were no problems with stent insertion and symptoms of obstruction and jaundice improved over this time. One study published in abstract form retrospectively compared 34 Viaduct stents matched with 240 "conventional" stents over a five year period. There was no statistical difference with stent dysfunction, and a trend towards patency with the Viaduct stent.

The primary aim of this study is to compare the stent patency time in the Viaduct and polyethylene stent groups in subjects with malignant bile duct strictures. The secondary aims are to determine the etiology of stent failure in the two treatment groups, to identify and compare device-related adverse events in the two treatment groups, to identify other patient factors associated with stent failure, and to compare survival between the Viaduct and polyethylene stent groups.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

58

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • British Columbia
      • Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V5Z 1M9
        • Vancouver General Hospital
      • Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V6Z 2K5
        • St Paul's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • > 18 years of age
  • Bile duct stricture confirmed on cholangiography at ERCP
  • Malignant etiology confirmed on histology or cytology
  • Duct stricture is > 1 cm distal to the biliary hilum (bifurcation of the common hepatic duct into the right and left hepatic ducts)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to obtain consent
  • Unable to tolerate procedure
  • Hilar strictures
  • Known benign biliary strictures and benign strictures confirmed after randomization
  • Circumstances where an alternative biliary stent (pigtail stent or metal stent) is deemed critical by the treating Gastroenterologist

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Winged perimeter stent
Patients who receive the Viaduct stent during ERCP
Insertion of a winged perimeter stent. Size to be determined during the ERCP based on findings.
Other Names:
  • Viaduct Stent
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: polyethylene stent arm
Patient who receive the traditional polyethylene stent during ERCP
insertion of a traditional polyethylene stent during ERCP, size to be determined depending on findings during ERCP
Other Names:
  • Cotton Huibregtse Stent

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Stent patency time
Time Frame: six months post stent insertion
Time to bile duct re-obstruction
six months post stent insertion

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Etiology of stent failure
Time Frame: six months post stent insertion
Usually occlusion or migration
six months post stent insertion
Compare number of patients with device related adverse events
Time Frame: six months post stent insertion
Comparing both procedural and delayed complications of stents
six months post stent insertion
Identify patient factors associated with stent failure
Time Frame: six months post stent insertion
six months post stent insertion
Survival between the two groups
Time Frame: six months post stent insertion
Measurement in months of survival post diagnosis
six months post stent insertion

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jennifer J Telford, MD MPH FRCPC, University of British Columbia

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

January 1, 2012

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

June 1, 2015

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

September 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 16, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 20, 2012

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

January 23, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

May 2, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 30, 2018

Last Verified

April 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • H10-02829

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Malignant Tumor of Extrahepatic Bile Duct

Clinical Trials on WInged perimeter biliary stent insertion (Viaduct)

3
Subscribe