Comparison of Perennial and Preseasonal Subcutaneous Immunotherapy

March 19, 2012 updated by: Piotr Kuna, MD, PhD, Medical University of Lodz

A Randomised Double-blind Clinical Trial for Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of Perennial in Comparison to Preseasonal Grass/Rye Pollen Immunotherapy in Patients Suffering From Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis

Specific immunotherapy, which involves the administration of allergic extracts to patients with symptoms of allergic disorder, is the leading therapeutical tool of modern allergology. According to the latest studies immunotherapy not only reduces symptoms' severity but also may modify the course of allergic disease by reducing the risk of new sensitisations and development of more advanced stages of the disease.It has been hypothesized basing on clinical observation that perennial immunotherapy is more effective and safer in comparison to preseasonal immunotherapy. The aim of the study was to compare the effect of perennial and preseasonal immunotherapy on rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms and safety of both treatments.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

120

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Lodz, Poland, 90-153
        • Department of Internal diseases, Asthma and Allergy

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 58 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. IgE-mediated seasonal allergic rhinitis with symptoms during the grass and rye pollens season (May, June, July);
  2. Symptoms of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis requiring medication during the last season
  3. Positive skin prick test to grass and rye pollens only with wheal at least as large as histamine control reaction and diameter > 5mm;
  4. For female patients effective contraception and negative pregnancy test results were necessary.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Previous course of immunotherapy with grass and rye pollens extracts or allergens which are unknown during the last 5 years
  2. FEV1 < 80% of predicted
  3. Uncontrolled bronchial asthma according to GINA
  4. Non-allergic rhinoconjunctivitis
  5. Severe acute or chronic diseases, severe inflammatory diseases
  6. Autoimmune diseases, immunosuppression, neoplastic diseases
  7. Severe psychiatric and psychological disorders including alcohol or drug abuse
  8. Contraindication for application of adrenaline;
  9. Treatment with beta-blockers
  10. Pregnancy or lactation period
  11. Females patients seeking to become pregnant
  12. Low compliance.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: preseasonal immunotherapy scheme
comparison of two schemes of immunotherapy - preseasonal and perennial immunotherapy.
Other Names:
  • Allergovit
Active Comparator: perennial immunotherapy scheme
comparison of two schemes of immunotherapy - preseasonal and perennial immunotherapy.
Other Names:
  • Allergovit

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
difference between preseasonal and perennial immunotherapy in area under curve of combined symptom medication score during 1st year of immunotherapy
Time Frame: up to 3 months
combined symptom medication score was calculated as a sum of rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms and use of rescue medications during pollen season
up to 3 months
difference between preseasonal and perennial immunotherapy in area under curve of combined symptom medication score during 2nd year of immunotherapy
Time Frame: up to 3 months
combined symptom medication score was calculated as a sum of rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms and use of rescue medications during pollen season
up to 3 months
difference between preseasonal and perennial immunotherapy in area under curve of combined symptom medication score during 3rd year of immunotherapy
Time Frame: up to 3 months
combined symptom medication score was calculated as a sum of rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms and use of rescue medications during pollen season
up to 3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
frequency of adverse reactions during immunotherapy
Time Frame: up to 3 years of immunotherapy
up to 3 years of immunotherapy
type of adverse reactions
Time Frame: up to 3 years of immunotherapy
up to 3 years of immunotherapy
the differences from baseline in mean daily rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms score
Time Frame: up to 3 months/4 years
up to 3 months/4 years
the differences between study groups in mean daily rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms score
Time Frame: up to 3 months/4 years
up to 3 months/4 years
the differences from baseline in combined symptom medication score
Time Frame: up to 3 months/4 years
up to 3 months/4 years
the differences from baseline a in serum level of sIgG4
Time Frame: the peak of each pollen season (June) during 4 years of study
the peak of each pollen season (June) during 4 years of study
the differences between study groups in combined symptom medication score
Time Frame: up to 3 months/4 years
up to 3 months/4 years
the differences between study groups in serum level of sIgG4
Time Frame: up to 3 months/4 years
up to 3 months/4 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Piotr Kuna, MD, PhD, Department of Internal Diseases, Asthma and allergy, Medical University of Lodz

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2003

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2006

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2006

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 6, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 14, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

March 15, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 21, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 19, 2012

Last Verified

March 1, 2012

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis

Clinical Trials on grass (80%) and rye (20%) pollens allergoids

3
Subscribe