- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01559948
Effectiveness of the Compression Belt for Patients With Sacroiliac Joint Pain
September 16, 2019 updated by: Kelli Brizzolara, Texas Woman's University
A Randomized Clinical Trial of the Effectiveness of the Compression Belt for Patients With Sacroiliac Joint Pain
The purpose of this randomized clinical trial is to examine the usefulness of the addition of a pelvic compression belt to a lumbopelvic stabilization program for patients with sacroiliac joint pain by comparing lumbopelvic stabilization exercises with a pelvic compression belt to lumbopelvic stabilization exercises alone.
Outcome measures including the Modified Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Index (OSW), the percentage change of TrA and IO muscle thickness (i.e.
muscle contraction from rest to contract) utilizing ultrasound imaging, the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) for pain, and a subjective rating of overall perceived improvement using the Global Rating of Change (GROC) scale will be collected.
Hypothesis: The OSW scores and NPRS scores will be lower for those who receive the compression belt in addition to the lumbopelvic stabilization program as compared to those who receive the lumbopelvic stabilization alone.
The percent change of muscle thickness for the deep abdominals as well as the GROC scores will be higher for those who receive the compression belt in addition to the lumbopelvic stabilization program as compared to those who receive the lumbopelvic stabilization alone.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Background: The estimated prevalence of sacroiliac joint (SIJ) pain is approximately 13-30% in patients with non-specific low back pain.
One common presentation for those with SIJ pain is unilateral pain over the SIJ region, which is described as a positive Fortin's sign.
Common impairments for this population include pelvic asymmetry, lumbopelvic muscle imbalance, and decreased lumbopelvic proprioceptive awareness and stability.
Two common physical therapy interventions for this population are lumbopelvic stabilization programs and pelvic compression belts.
The purpose of this randomized clinical trial is to examine the usefulness of the addition of a pelvic compression belt to a lumbopelvic stabilization program for patients with sacroiliac joint pain by comparing lumbopelvic stabilization exercises with a pelvic compression belt to lumbopelvic stabilization exercises alone.
Participants: Thirty participants with unilateral pain near the SIJ will be recruited for the study and randomly assigned to 1 of 2 treatment groups (stabilization plus belt or stabilization alone).
Both groups will receive a lumbopelvic stabilization program for 12 weeks.
The stabilization plus belt group will also receive a pelvic compression belt to be worn continuously for the first 4 weeks.
Outcome measures including the Modified Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Index (OSW), the percentage change of TrA and IO muscle thickness (i.e.
muscle contraction from rest to contract) utilizing ultrasound imaging, the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) for pain, and a subjective rating of overall perceived improvement using the Global Rating of Change (GROC) scale will be collected.
These outcomes will be assessed at baseline, 4 weeks, and 3 months post-intervention.
Hypothesis: The OSW scores and NPRS scores will be lower for those who receive the compression belt in addition to the lumbopelvic stabilization program as compared to those who receive the lumbopelvic stabilization alone.
The percent change of muscle thickness for the deep abdominals as well as the GROC scores will be higher for those who receive the compression belt in addition to the lumbopelvic stabilization program as compared to those who receive the lumbopelvic stabilization alone.
Data Analysis: Two separate ANOVAs (group x time) with repeated measures will be used to examine the effect of the interventions on disability and the percent change of muscle thickness.
Whitney U-test will be used to analyze the NPRS data, and descriptive statistics will be used to report the GROC scores.
Clinical Relevance: The results of the study may provide evidence in prescribing pelvic compression belt for those with SIJ pain.
It will also offer guidance as to how and when pelvic compression belts should be used in this population.
Finally, it will guide physical therapists in prescribing effective interventions for those with SIJ pain.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
30
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Texas
-
Dallas, Texas, United States, 75235
- Texas Woman's University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 65 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- unilateral pain near the sacroiliac joint that does not extend pass the knee
positive result on 2 of 6 sacroiliac joint provocation tests:
- compression test
- distraction test
- posterior shear test
- Gaenslens' test (left and right)
- sacral thrust test
Exclusion Criteria:
- current pregnancy or pregnancy in the last 6 months
- history of surgery to lumbar spine, pelvis, chest, abdomen
- history of congenital lumbar or pelvic anomalies
- any neurological signs in the lower extremity
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: DOUBLE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
EXPERIMENTAL: Lumbopelvic stabilization exercises plus sacroiliac joint belt
The participants will be instructed in the lumbopelvic stabilization program.
Additionally, during the initial session, these participants receive a sacroiliac compression belt and be instructed to wear the belt during all waking hours for the first four weeks of the study.
|
The objective of this exercise program is to recruit and train the primary stabilizing muscles of the spine in order for them to more appropriately support the spine.
Participants will complete 4 different exercises daily: one in supine, one in standing, one in quadruped, and one in a side-bridge position.
The dosage for each exercise is 20 reps with an 8 second hold.
In supine, the first exercise is the abdominal drawing-in maneuver.
In standing, the first exercise is the abdominal drawing-in maneuver.
In quadruped, the first exercise is alternating arm lifts.
The final exercise is the side-bridge hold.
Participants will then be asked to attend supervised physical therapy sessions twice a week for 2 weeks and once a week for another 2 weeks.
They will be instructed to perform the exercises at home daily for a total of 12 weeks as well as complete a compliance log.
Progression of the stabilization program will be determined by the physical therapist based on pre-established criteria.
The belt should be worn low around the pelvis just above the greater trochanter and instructed to wear the belt during all waking hours of the first four weeks of the study.
The treating physical therapist will monitor the placement of belts during each exercise session.
Belt usage logs will be given to each participant to assess compliance with wearing the belt.
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Lumbopelvic stabilization exercise
The participants will be instructed in the lumbopelvic stabilization program.
|
The objective of this exercise program is to recruit and train the primary stabilizing muscles of the spine in order for them to more appropriately support the spine.
Participants will complete 4 different exercises daily: one in supine, one in standing, one in quadruped, and one in a side-bridge position.
The dosage for each exercise is 20 reps with an 8 second hold.
In supine, the first exercise is the abdominal drawing-in maneuver.
In standing, the first exercise is the abdominal drawing-in maneuver.
In quadruped, the first exercise is alternating arm lifts.
The final exercise is the side-bridge hold.
Participants will then be asked to attend supervised physical therapy sessions twice a week for 2 weeks and once a week for another 2 weeks.
They will be instructed to perform the exercises at home daily for a total of 12 weeks as well as complete a compliance log.
Progression of the stabilization program will be determined by the physical therapist based on pre-established criteria.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Oswestry Low Back Pain Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 12 weeks
|
The Modified Oswestry Back Pain Questionnaire(OSW) will be used to determine Low back pain-related disability.
The OSW consists of 10 items assessing different aspects of pain and function related to LBP.
Each item is scored 0-5.
The item scores are summed and multiplied by 2 to get the total disability score.
The total score reported can range from 0-100 with 0 representing no disability and higher scores representing greater disability.
|
Baseline, 4 weeks, 12 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 12 weeks
|
The numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) is an 11-point scale with 0 representing "no pain" and 10 representing "worst imaginable pain."
This scale will be used to assess pain intensity.
|
Baseline, 4 weeks, 12 weeks
|
Percent Change of Muscle Thickness for the Transverse Abdominis (TrA)
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 12 weeks
|
The percent change of muscle thickness of the TrA will be assessed using ultrasound imaging.
The deep abdominal muscles will be imaged in brightness mode (b-mode) using the SonoSite M-Turbo Ultrasound System.
A 2-5 MHz broad spectrum curvilinear transducer will be used to obtain the images.
Images were saved for offline analysis using ImageJ software.
The muscle thickness for each muscle was determined by the linear distance between the upper and lower fascial lines at the midpoint of the muscle as measured by ImageJ Software.
The percent change of muscle thickness was calculated using the following formula: (contracted thickness - resting thickness)/ resting thickness x 100%.
|
Baseline, 4 weeks, 12 weeks
|
Change in Global Rating of Change (GROC) Scale
Time Frame: 4 weeks, 12 weeks
|
The GROC scale will be used to assess the participants' overall perception of improvement since the beginning the interventions.
This is a scale ranging from -7 ("a very great deal worse") to 0 ("about the same") to +7 ("a very great deal better").
|
4 weeks, 12 weeks
|
Percent Change of Muscle Thickness for Internal Oblique
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 12 weeks
|
The percent change of muscle thickness of the Internal Oblique will be assessed using ultrasound imaging.
The deep abdominal muscles will be imaged in brightness mode (b-mode) using the SonoSite M-Turbo Ultrasound System.
A 2-5 MHz broad spectrum curvilinear transducer will be used to obtain the images.
Images were saved for offline analysis using ImageJ software.
The muscle thickness for was determined by the linear distance between the upper and lower fascial lines at the midpoint of the muscle as measured by ImageJ Software.
The percent change of muscle thickness was calculated using the following formula: (contracted thickness - resting thickness)/ resting thickness x 100%.
|
Baseline, 4 weeks, 12 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Kelli J Brizzolara, MS, Texas Woman's University
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
January 1, 2012
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
February 1, 2014
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
February 1, 2014
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
February 3, 2012
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 19, 2012
First Posted (ESTIMATE)
March 21, 2012
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
October 7, 2019
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
September 16, 2019
Last Verified
September 1, 2019
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 16931
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Low Back Pain
-
Dow University of Health SciencesRecruitingLow Back Pain | Chronic Low-back Pain | Low Back Pain, Mechanical | Mechanical Low Back Pain | Pain, Chronic | Pain, Back | Lower Back Pain Chronic | CLBP - Chronic Low Back PainPakistan
-
Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de...CompletedLow Back Pain, Mechanical | Low Back Pain, Postural | Lower Back Pain Chronic | Low Back Pain, Posterior CompartmentBrazil
-
University School of Physical Education in WroclawCompletedLow Back Pain | Low Back Pain, Mechanical | Low Back Pain, PosturalPoland
-
Texas Woman's UniversityTexas Physical Therapy AssociationCompletedLow Back Pain | Chronic Low Back Pain | Subacute Low Back PainUnited States
-
University of ParmaKing's College London; Helmholtz Zentrum München; GENOS; Ip Research Consulting... and other collaboratorsUnknownChronic Low Back Pain | Acute Low Back PainUnited States, Australia, Belgium, Croatia, Italy, United Kingdom
-
Karolinska InstitutetCompletedChronic Low Back Pain | Recurrent Low Back Pain | Persistent Low Back PainSweden
-
Ache Laboratorios Farmaceuticos S.A.Unknown
-
Palmer College of ChiropracticDepartment of Health and Human ServicesCompletedChronic Low Back Pain | Subacute Low Back PainUnited States
-
Universität Duisburg-EssenSiemens-BetriebskrankenkasseCompletedChronic Low Back Pain | Recurrent Low Back Pain
-
Apsen Farmaceutica S.A.CompletedLow Back Pain | Low Back Pain, Mechanical | Acute Low Back PainBrazil
Clinical Trials on Lumbopelvic stabilization exercise
-
Cairo UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
Texas Woman's UniversityWithdrawnPregnancy-related Low Back PainUnited States
-
Universidad de ZaragozaUnknownAnterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries | Injuries, Knee | Prevention & ControlSpain
-
Comenius UniversityCompletedStress Urinary Incontinence in WomenSlovakia
-
University of ChileCompletedSpinal Stenosis Lumbar | Arthrosis; SpineChile
-
Kirsehir Ahi Evran UniversitesiCompleted
-
Ankara Yildirim Beyazıt UniversityUnknownRheumatic Diseases | Fibromyalgia | ExerciseTurkey
-
University of VermontEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development...Completed
-
Sahmyook UniversityRecruitingChronic Nonspecific Neck PainKorea, Republic of
-
Cairo UniversityCompleted