Tap Water Versus Normal Saline for Wound Irrigation

March 23, 2012 updated by: Stanford University

A Prospective Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Tap Water Irrigation With Normal Saline for Wound Management

This study is designed to compare the infection rates in wounds irrigated with sterile normal saline to those irrigated with chlorinated tap water. The hypothesis is that the wound infection rate subsequent to irrigation with tap water is not significantly different than the infection rate for wounds irrigated with sterile normal saline.

Inclusion criteria are patients older than 1-year of age who present to the emergency department with a soft-tissue laceration requiring repair. Exclusion criteria include patients with any underlying immunocompromising illness, current use of antibiotics, puncture or bite wounds, underlying tendon or bone involvement, or wounds more than nine hours old.

Patients are randomized to have their wounds irrigated either with tap water or sterile normal saline prior to closure, controlling for the volume and irrigation method used. Structured follow-up is completed at 48 hours and 30 days to determine the presence of infection.

The primary outcome measure is the difference in wound infection rates between the two randomized groups.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

660

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • California
      • Stanford, California, United States, 94305
        • Stanford University Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

1 year and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Patients older than 1-year of age, who presented to the ED with an uncomplicated soft-tissue laceration requiring repair.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diabetes mellitus
  • Asplenism
  • primary immune disorder
  • Mechanical heart valve
  • Chronic alcoholism
  • Steroid use,
  • Antibiotics use
  • Immunosuppressive chemotherapy
  • Wounds older than 9 hours or from a human or animal bite
  • Puncture wounds
  • Wounds associated with bone, tendon, or neurovascular injury

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: wounds irrigated with sterile normal saline
Patients in this arm had their wounds irrigated with sterile normal saline
Procedure: wound irrigation with study fluid
wounds were either irrigated with sterile normal saline or tap water.
Other: wound irrigation with tap water
Patients in the arm had their wounds irrigated with tap water
Procedure: wound irrigation with study fluid
wounds were either irrigated with sterile normal saline or tap water.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Wound Infection at 48 hours
Time Frame: 48 hours
The primary outcome for this study is the difference in wound infection rates between the two randomized groups. It is assessed at 48 hours
48 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
wound infection manifest at 30 days
Time Frame: 30 days
patients are again contacted at 30 days after repair of their wound to assess for evidence of delayed or late infections
30 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Stanford University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 1994

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 1996

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 1996

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 22, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 23, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

March 27, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 27, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 23, 2012

Last Verified

March 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • M1272

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Wound Infection Rate

Clinical Trials on wound irrigation with study fluid

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in India

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

3
Subscribe