Clinical Trial Using Bipolar Technology for Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor

February 2, 2015 updated by: Eddie SY Chan, MD, Chinese University of Hong Kong

Using Biploar Technology for Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor - a Randomized Controlled Trial

Bladder cancer is a common urological malignant disease. Patients with bladder cancer will first be managed with transurethral resection (TUR) of bladder tumor. For many years, monopolar transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURP) has been the gold standard for treatment. However, complications including bleeding, bladder perforation and inadequate sampling of deep tumor biopsy remain the major concerns. Recently published papers suggested that the newer bipolar TUR technology has similar surgical outcomes but less complications comparing with monopolar TUR. In this study, investigators will investigate the benefit of new technology as compared with conventional monopolar resection on tumor clearance, complication and recurrence rates.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Transurethral resection (TUR) of bladder tumor is one of commonest procedures in urology practice. It is the surgery of choice for staging and treating non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. Short lengths of hospital stay, simple and safe are the main advantages of the surgery. Conventional TUR is performed with monopolar diathermy, which commonly elicits obturator reflexes in lateral-located tumor. However, it is not without complication. Bleeding and bladder perforation with or without obturator reflex are the most significant complications after TUR of bladder tumor. The charring effect of monopolar is also a concern as the diagnosis of muscle invasion by tumor is determined by the integrity of tumor base biopsy. Mariappan et al. reported that as high as 33% of the specimen had no detrusor muscle present for assessment. The absent of muscle not only affect the staging procedure but also associated with higher cancer recurrence rate.

Bipolar resection has been widely used in transurethral resection of prostate (TURP). As compared with the traditional monopolar technology, the electric current passes through the instrument sheath. The advantage of bipolar technology includes less obturator reflex, good hemostasis and early recovery. Study has showed that the cautery artifact is more severe on monopolar resection as compared with bipolar in prostate tissues. Due to the clean and precise cutting, there will be less charring on the specimen and thermal injury to peripheral tissues. Applying to bladder tumor resection, this will improve the staging accuracy with better determination of the depth of invasion. Furthermore, with the use of saline instead of glycine as irrigation fluid, risk of TUR syndrome is minimized. There is no randomized trial on the benefit of using bipolar instrument on TUR bladder cancer. In this study, investigator will investigate the role of bipolar technology in TUR bladder cancer as compared with traditional monopolar resection.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

150

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Shatin, Hong Kong
        • Recruiting
        • Prince of Wales Hospital
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Eddie SY Chan, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Chi Fai Ng, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Simon SM Hou, MBBS
      • Sheung Shui, Hong Kong
        • Not yet recruiting
        • North District Hospital
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Ho Yuen Cheung, MBChB

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult male or female patients (age ≥ 18)
  • Patients who have diagnosed with bladder cancer (either primary or recurrent) by cystoscopy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who are scheduled for second TUR within 6 weeks after the previous TUR

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Monopolar TUR
Monopolar diathermy is used to perform tranurethral resection of bladder tumor
monopolar diathermy
Other Names:
  • Olympus Monopolar HF-resection Electrode
  • Model: A22205A
Experimental: Biploar TUR
Bipolar diathermy is used to perform transurethral resection of bladder tumor
bipolar diathermy
Other Names:
  • Olympus TURis Bipolar HF-resection electrode
  • Model: WA22306D

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Muscle sampling rate
Time Frame: An expected average of 7 days post operation
To assess the charring effect to the integrity of the tumor base biopsy
An expected average of 7 days post operation
Incidence of TUR syndrome
Time Frame: Intra-operation and up to 7 days post operation
Intra-operation and up to 7 days post operation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Recurrence rate of bladder cancer
Time Frame: 3 months and 6 months after surgery
3 months and 6 months after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Eddie SY Chan, MD, Chinese University of Hong Kong

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2015

Study Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 21, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 19, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

April 20, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 4, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 2, 2015

Last Verified

February 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Urinary Bladder Tumor

Clinical Trials on Monopolar diathermy

3
Subscribe