WHO Drug Study for Buruli Ulcer - Comparison of SR8 and CR8

September 24, 2019 updated by: Tjip van der Werf, University Medical Center Groningen

Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Efficacy of 8 Weeks Treatment With Clarithromycin and Rifampicin Versus Streptomycin and Rifampicin for Buruli Ulcer (M. Ulcerans Infection)

This is a WHO-sponsored trial.

Combination therapy with streptomycin and rifampicin has been the standard antibiotic treatment for M. ulcerans infection since 2004. In March 2010, a WHO Technical Advisory Group recommended that a trial be carried out to develop a fully oral treatment for the disease. Although the current treatment is effective, injection with streptomycin is a problem. Several small observational studies (published and unpublished) have shown that a fully oral treatment is promising.

This WHO sponsored study will be a randomized, controlled open label non-inferiority phase II/III, multi-centre trial (1 centre in Benin and 4 centres in Ghana), with two parallel treatment groups. The ultimate goal is to search for an effective alternative treatment to the current standard WHO-recommended therapy for all forms of Buruli ulcer, which includes injections of streptomycin with inherent logistic, operational and safety disadvantages.

Financial and material support:

  1. American Leprosy Missions, USA
  2. Raoul Follereau Foundation, France
  3. MAP International, USA
  4. Sanofi, France
  5. 7th Framework Programme of the European Union: BuruliVac project (241500)
  6. Aranz Medical Limited, New Zealand

Study Overview

Detailed Description

A total of 415 patients in whom Buruli ulcer has been clinically diagnosed will be included in the study, which will consist of 332 cases of category I and II Buruli ulcers (<10 cm) confirmed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), plus 83 non PCR-confirmed Buruli ulcers. Patients will be randomized to receive treatment with the two antibiotic regimens as follows:

(i) Regimen I (SR8): 15 mg/kg streptomycin per day intramuscular injection for 8 weeks plus 10 mg/kg per day oral rifampicin for 8 weeks; (ii) Regimen II (CR8): 15 mg/kg per day oral extended-release clarithromycin for 8 weeks plus 10 mg/kg per day oral rifampicin for 8 weeks.

Assessments before, during and after the course of antibiotic treatment will include full medical history, clinical assessments and monitoring of vital signs, assessment of the lesion, laboratory investigations, hearing test, electrocardiogram, pregnancy test, voluntary HIV counseling and testing, and functional limitation assessment. The primary efficacy parameters are healing without recurrence and without excision surgery 12 months after the start of treatment.

The primary endpoint will be assessed by a panel of experts unaware of the treatment ('single blinded' for treatment allocation).

Statistician:

Mr Bruno Scherrer, Consultant, Drugs for Neglected Diseases initiative, Switzerland

Data Management:

Mr Raymond Omollo, Drugs for Neglected Diseases initiative (DNDi) Africa

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

310

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Pobè, Benin
        • Pobè Treatment Center
      • Agogo, Ghana
        • Agogo Presbyterian Hospital
      • Dunkwa, Ghana
        • Dunkwa Government Hospital
      • Nkawie Panyin, Ghana
        • Nkawie-Toase Government Hospital
      • Tepa, Ghana
        • Tepa Government Hosital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

5 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT, CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  • All patients (both genders) with a clinical diagnosis of BUD (categories: I and II, cross-sectional diameter ≤ 10cm) as agreed by study site treatment team led by the lead clinicians

Exclusion criteria:

  1. Patients with lesion sizes >10cm in cross-sectional diameter
  2. Children < 5 years, or < 20 kilograms body weight
  3. Pregnancy (self-reported, clinically diagnosed, or urine test (beta-hCG) positive
  4. Patients with previous treatment of Buruli ulcer, tuberculosis or leprosy with at least one of the study drugs (rifampicin, streptomycin, clarithromycin)
  5. Patients with history of hypersensitivity to rifampicin and/or streptomycin and/or clarithromycin
  6. Patients with previous treatment with macrolide or quinolone antibiotics, or antituberculosis medication, or immuno-modulatory drugs including corticosteroids within one month
  7. Patients with current treatment with any drugs likely to interact with the study medication, e.g, anticoagulants, cyclosporin, phenytoin, and phenobarbitone. Users of oral contraceptives should be notified that such contraceptive is less reliable if taken with rifampicin; alternative (mechanical) contraceptive methods will be discussed with the study participant
  8. Patients with co-infection with HIV
  9. Patients with history or having current clinical signs of ascites, jaundice, partial or complete deafness, myasthenia gravis, renal dysfunction (known or suspected), diabetes mellitus, and severe immune compromise (e.g., immunosuppressive drugs after organ transplant), or evidence of (previous) tuberculosis, Buruli ulcer or leprosy; or terminal illness (e.g., metastasized cancer)
  10. Patients who are unable to take oral medication or having gastrointestinal disease likely to interfere with drug absorption
  11. Patients with known or suspected bowel strictures who cannot tolerate macrolide antibiotics such as clarithromycin
  12. Patients with mental condition, including addiction with substance abuse (alcohol, qat, etc) likely to interfere with possibility to comply with the study protocol
  13. Patients who are not willing to give informed pre-consent, and consent (patient and/or parent/legal representative), or withdrawal of consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: SR8
Streptomycin (S: 15 mg/kg per day, intramuscularly) in combination with rifampicin (R: 10 mg/kg per day, orally) for 8 weeks
daily intramuscular drug injection
EXPERIMENTAL: CR8
Clarithromycin (C: 15 mg/kg per day, oral extended release formulation) in combination with rifampicin (10 mg/kg per day, orally) for 8 weeks
oral administration of Clarithromycin extended release

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
healing without recurrence and without excision surgery
Time Frame: 12 months after start of treatment
complete epithelialisation and absence of swelling at the site of original infection, measured 12 months after start of treatment; lesion site will be examined by inspection and palpation, and documented by digital camera; digital images will be examined by panel of wound experts unaware of treatment allocation
12 months after start of treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Recurrence rate within 12 months of treatment initiation
Time Frame: 12 months
number of recurrent lesions occurring after initial healing within 12 months after start of treatment
12 months
Rate of treatment failure within 12 months of treatment initiation
Time Frame: 12 months
proportion of treatment failure will be compared between groups
12 months
Rate of paradoxical response within 12 months of treatment initiation
Time Frame: 12 months
paradoxical responses that have occurred during BUD treatment will be compared in both treatment arms
12 months
Proportion of patients with reduction in lesion surface area within 12 months of treatment initiation
Time Frame: 12 months
if not cured, will there be a difference between groups in terms of reduction of lesion size?
12 months
Time taken for complete lesion healing within 12 months of treatment initiation
Time Frame: 12 months
do lesions heal faster in one of the two treatments?
12 months
Proportion (%) of patients with complete healing without additional surgery or relapse
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
Interval between healing and recurrence
Time Frame: 12 months
if recurrences occur, there might be a difference in time between healing and recurrences between treatment groups
12 months
Proportion of each type of surgery within 12 months of treatment initiation
Time Frame: 12 months
We do not expect surgery but IF doctors operate, which type of surgery would doctors use, and does this differ between groups?
12 months
Time from treatment initiation to surgery if any
Time Frame: 12months
does the timing of surgery differ between groups for the proportion of patients in whom doctors decide to operate?
12months
Proportion of patients with residual functional limitations
Time Frame: 12 months
do treatments differ in terms of chance to develop functional limitations?
12 months
Treatment discontinuation and compliance rates
Time Frame: 8 weeks
one treatment might be better tolerated than the other; do treatments differ in terms of adherence problems, and do participants in any of these two treatment arms differ in terms of the chance to discontinue the treatment?
8 weeks
Incidence of all adverse effects (AEs) within 12 months of treatment initiation
Time Frame: 12 months
adverse effects occurring during or after treatment may be different between treatments
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2012

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

December 1, 2017

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

January 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 2, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 6, 2012

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

August 7, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

September 26, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 24, 2019

Last Verified

September 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

after publication, IPD will be made available at the time of publication; enrollment is complewted with 310 participants enrolled by Dec 2017; final report submitted for publication Sept 2019

IPD Sharing Time Frame

data analysis report as well as data in OpenClinica deposited with DNDi Regional Africa Office Nairobi

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mycobacterium Ulcerans Infection

Clinical Trials on Streptomycin intramuscular injection

3
Subscribe