Effectiveness of Insoles Provided to Patients With Diabetes. A Longitudinal Randomized Controlled Study in Gothenburg

July 25, 2019 updated by: Ulla Hellstrand Tang, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Sweden

Effectiveness of Insoles Provided to Diabetic Patients at Risk to Develop Ulcers

Introduction: Insoles and shoes are frequently prescribed to prevent foot ulcers in patients at risk of diabetes. A combination of neuropathy and foot deformities raises the risk from 1% to between 4-7% according to the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare, Guidelines Diabetes Care 2010. Preventative care, which includes foot care, annual inspection of the feet, education and prescription of insoles in combination with well fitting shoes are supposed to decrease the risk of ulcers and prevent amputation. Further research is, however, needed to evaluate the effectiveness of these commonly prescribed insoles. The aim of this study is to compare three different types of insoles with respect to pressure distribution. Every 6 months follow-up is assessed until 24 months is reached.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Patients included in the study were randomized into 3 different groups. Group number 1 and 2 got custom made insoles out of EVA (Ethyl Vinyl Acetate) with different hardness 35 and 55 shore respectively. Group nr 3 got prefabricated insole with support of the medial arch and in the forefoot. The top layer was covered with a 2 mm cushioned material, 25 shore, made out of microcellular urethane. All patients were recommended to wear good walking shoes with a semi rigid outer sole and stable heel counter. One and the same technician made the casting and fabricated the insoles as well as delivered the devices. Deliverance occured 2-3 weeks after the first visit.

At deliverance base line measurement was assessed.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

114

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Gothenburg, Sweden, 413 45
        • Lundbergs Laboratory for Orthopaedic Research

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  • First time visitor to Dept of Prosthetics & Orthotics
  • Diabetes
  • Age > 18 year
  • Be able to walk independently
  • Be able to read and understand Swedish

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Ulcers

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Prefabricated insoles
Prefabricated insoles with support in medial arch and metatarsal pad. A 2 mm top layer of cushioned material.
Prefabricated insoles
Other Names:
  • Bauerfeind GloboTec® 312750501400
Experimental: Custom made insoles 35 shore
Custom made insoles formed over an individual cast positive. 35 shore of hardness in material Ethyl Vinyl Acetate
Insoles in Ethyl Vinyl Acetate (EVA) manufactured over an individual positive cast.
Experimental: 55 shore Custom made insoles
Custom made insoles formed over an individual cast positive. 55 shore of hardness in material Ethyl Vinyl Acetate
Insoles in Ethyl Vinyl Acetate (EVA) manufactured over an individual positive cast.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
In shoe plantar pressure measurement
Time Frame: up to 24 months
up to 24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Gait analysis
Time Frame: every 6 months until 24 months is reached
Optical tracking system with skin-mounted markers
every 6 months until 24 months is reached

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Health related quality of life
Time Frame: every 6 months until 24 months is reached
every 6 months until 24 months is reached
Cost and cost analysis
Time Frame: 24 month
Calculation of costs for orthopaedic appliance in studied population
24 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Roy Tranberg, PhD, Lundbergs Laboratory for Orthopaedic Research

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 9, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 10, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

August 13, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 29, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 25, 2019

Last Verified

July 1, 2019

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Quality of Life

Clinical Trials on Prefabricated insoles

3
Subscribe