Study to Compare (COPD) Assessment Test in COPD Stage III and IV in a Prophylactic Treatment

May 2, 2016 updated by: ElectroCore INC

A Prospective, Single Site, Randomized, Controlled, Parallel Group Study in Subjects With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Stage III and IV Using AlphaCore or Sham (Control, Not Active) as a Prophylactic Treatment

The study will assess the treatment of patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) stage III and IV who will self administer the AlphaCore stimulation three times a day over a course of 2 months. Patients will either receive an active AlphaCore device or a Sham device during these two months while not knowing which device they have been provided. At the end of the two months, all patients will be asked to continue in the study for another 2 months to self administer with the active AlphaCore device. Subjects will complete diaries at home on their breathing and quality of life and will return to the clinic monthly for assessment by the investigator.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

PERFORMANCE AND SAFETY VARIABLES:

The primary efficacy endpoint for this study is the total Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) Assessment Test (CAT) score change from baseline to the 8 week follow-up period comparing the two device groups.

Secondary efficacy endpoints will be the mean difference from baseline to the 8 week follow-up for the following assessments: Medical Research Council (MRC) dyspnoea scale, 6 minutes walking test and Forced Expiratory Volume in one second (FEV1)

Safety Variables:

Each subject will be assessed throughout the study for Adverse Events and at the last visit (4 months) subjects will undergo another physical examination including vital signs and blood pressure.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

54

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Oder
      • Schwedt, Oder, Germany, D-16303
        • Praxis fur Pneumologie am Asklepios Klinikum Uckermark

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 40-75 years
  • Diagnosed Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(COPD) stage III and IV according to Global Initiative for chronic obstructive lung disease (GOLD) guideline
  • Forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV 1) < 50%
  • Forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1/Forced expiratory vital capacity (FVC) < 70%
  • Signed informed consent form

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participation in other clinical trials (drug or medical device) 30 days prior to start of this study
  • Subject is unable to comply with the procedures if the protocol for the study or any other reason judged by the Investigator that could interfere with the study assessment or follow-up
  • Has an abscess or other infection or lesion (including lymphadenopathy) at the AlphaCore® treatment site.
  • Is currently implanted with an electrical and/or neurostimulator device, including but not limited to cardiac pacemaker, defibrillator, vagal neurostimulator, deep brain stimulator, spinal stimulator, bone growth stimulator, or cochlear implant.
  • Has a history of carotid endarterectomy or vascular neck surgery on the right side.
  • Right side or bilateral vagotomy
  • Has a recent or repeated history of syncope.
  • Has a recent or repeated history of seizures.
  • Pregnant or breast feeding women

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Active AlphaCore device
AlphaCore active stimulation treatment
Each study group will go under the same treatment regimen and assessments.
Sham Comparator: Sham AlphaCore device
AlphaCore sham device
Each study group will go under the same treatment regimen and assessments.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Assessment Test (CAT) Scores (Quality of Life and Symptoms) Changes Within a Treatment Period and Comparison Between the Two Groups
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Assessment Test (CAT) scores (Quality of life and symptoms) changes within a treatment period and comparison between the two groups. Eight (8) questions. The scale is rated from 0 to 5, min = 0, max = 5. Low rates = better, high rates = worse. Mean change in the period 8 weeks versus baseline.
8 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Borg Dyspnoea Scores
Time Frame: Baseline vs 8 weeks
Borg dyspnoea scale (Physical activity test): 0 - 11 (Not at all effected - Extremely effected) The result show the change between the the treatment groups from baseline to week 8
Baseline vs 8 weeks
Change 6 Minutes Walking Test
Time Frame: Baseline vs 8 weeks
Six minutes walking test: Measure distance (meter) after 6 minutes walk. Change from Baseline between treatment groups
Baseline vs 8 weeks
Change in Forced Expiratory Volume (FEV1)
Time Frame: Baseline vs 8 weeks

Forced Expiratory Volume (FEV1): Maximum volume that can be exhaled in the first second - after maximum inhalation.

Change from baseline to week 8 between treatment groups

Baseline vs 8 weeks
Change in EuroQol, 5 Questions and 3 Levels (EQ5D-3L)
Time Frame: Baseline vs 8 weeks

The EQ-5D-3L (EuroQoL 5 questions and 3 answering levels) during the run-in period will be compared with the EQ-5D-3L during the treatment period. And treatment period will be compared to open label.

Rating of questions Level 1 no problems Level 2 some problems Level 3 Significant problems Worst case is 15 points and best case is 5 points using index

Baseline vs 8 weeks
Number of Subjects With Adverse Events (AE)
Time Frame: Throughout the course of the study (baseline to the 4 month follow-up visit)

All AEs including but not limited to events reported by the subject or reported in response to an open question by the Clinical Investigator or member of this team, which fall into any of the above definitions must be recorded as an AE in the Case Report Form (CRF) and should include the following information.

  • Brief description of the event (diagnosis)
  • Start date (and time, if relevant)
  • Stop date (and time, if relevant) (or resolution)
  • Severity
  • Action taken regarding the medical device
  • Opinion on causality
  • Seriousness
  • Outcome
Throughout the course of the study (baseline to the 4 month follow-up visit)
Change in Change in EuroQol, 5 Questions and 3 Levels (EQ-5D-3L), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: Baseline vs 8 weeks
Visual analogue scale (VAS) 0-100 where 0 is the worst imaginable health state and 100 the best imaginable health state
Baseline vs 8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Matthias John, MD, Praxis fur Pneumologie am Asklepios Klinikum Uckermark

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 15, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 31, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

September 6, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 9, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 2, 2016

Last Verified

May 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

No description

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Clinical Trials on AlphaCore device

3
Subscribe