Integrated Mindfulness-based Cognitive Behaviour Therapy Versus Cognitive Behaviour Therapy for Provoked Vestibulodynia (COMFORT)

February 25, 2020 updated by: Lori Brotto, University of British Columbia
This randomized trial, nicknamed the COMFORT (Cognitive therapy or Mindfulness FOR Treatment of pvd) study, will compare the effects of an 8-session group Mindfulness-based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT) to an 8-session group Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) for women with provoked vestibulodynia (PVD). Women with PVD will be randomly assigned to attend either eight sessions of group MBCT or CBT. Each session is 2.25 hours long and spaced 1 week apart. The purpose of this study is to determine whether the 8-session MBCT intervention for PVD is no worse than an 8-session CBT intervention for decreasing women's pain intensity, sexual distress, catastrophizing and hypervigilance towards pain.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

PURPOSE:

The purpose of this study is to determine whether an 8-session MBCT intervention for PVD is no worse than an 8-session CBT intervention for improving women's pain intensity and reducing their sexual distress, catastrophizing and hypervigilance towards pain. The investigators will also examine whether pain improvements at follow-up are mediated by changes in self-compassion and mindfulness (in the MBCT arm only) and moderated by pre-treatment credibility, personality, and anxiety sensitivity.

HYPOTHESES:

  1. At follow-up (4 weeks, 6 months and 12 months post-treatment), women in the MBCT arm will experience a greater decline (vs. pre-treatment) in vestibular pain intensity compared to women in the CBT arm.
  2. At follow-up (4 weeks, 6 months and 12 months post-treatment), women in the MBCT arm will experience a greater decline (vs. pre-treatment) in sex-related distress, pain catastrophizing, hypervigilance, and self-reported pain during intercourse/other penetrative sex compared to women in the CBT arm.
  3. The investigators hypothesize that improvements in pain intensity during vestibular touch will be mediated by changes in self-compassion and mindfulness in the MBCT arm only at 6 and 12 months follow-up.
  4. The investigators hypothesize that pre-treatment credibility, personality, and anxiety sensitivity will significantly moderate improvements in pain intensity during vestibular touch at 6 and 12 months follow-up.
  5. The investigators hypothesize improvements in both arms on the "Patient Global Impression of Change Scale" and significantly greater improvements in the MBCT arm relative to the CBT arm at follow-up (4 weeks, 6 months and 12 months post-treatment).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

130

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • British Columbia
      • Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V5Z 1M9
        • Department of Gynaecology
      • Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V5Z 1M9
        • British Columbia Centre for Sexual Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • diagnosis of provoked vestibulodynia (PVD)
  • 19 years of age or older
  • premenopausal
  • fluent in English
  • during the study, women must agree not to change any medications they are taking for PVD.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • unprovoked vulvar pain, other pathology causing pain with penetration, or chronic pelvic pain
  • being uncomfortable and unwilling to participate in a group setting.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT)
Women in the MBCT Group Treatment arm will receive the treatment in small group format (8-9 women). Each session will be 2.25 hours in duration and there will be eight, weekly sessions over the course of 2 months. Session content includes education about chronic pain, PVD, stress and sexual response, mindfulness practices, and cognitive techniques to notice thought patterns that contribute to increased pain.
The MBCT intervention will be administered in small group format (8-9 women). Each session will be 2.25 hours in duration and there will be eight, weekly sessions over the course of 2 months. Session content includes education about chronic pain, PVD, stress and sexual response, mindfulness practices, and cognitive techniques to notice thought patterns that contribute to increased pain.
Other Names:
  • MBCT
Experimental: Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT)
Women in the CBT Group Treatment arm will receive the treatment in small group format (8-9 women). Each session will be 2.25 hrs in duration and there will be eight, weekly sessions over the course of 2 months. Session content includes education about chronic pain, PVD, stress and sexual response, behavioural techniques such as progressive muscle relaxation, cognitive techniques to challenge unhealthy thinking patterns, and communication skills training.
The CBT intervention will be administered to women in small group format (8-9 women). Each session will be 2.25-hrs in duration and there will be eight, weekly sessions over the course of 2 months. Session content includes education about chronic pain, PVD, stress and sexual response, behavioural techniques such as progressive muscle relaxation, cognitive techniques to challenge unhealthy thinking patterns, and communication skills training.
Other Names:
  • CBT

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Vulvslgesiometer Pain Rating From Baseline to One Month Post-treatment to 6 Months Post-treatment
Time Frame: Pre-treatment, one month post-treatment and 6 months post-treatment.
The investigators have selected pain intensity during a controlled examination as the primary endpoint in this study. Specifically, pain intensity at the vulvar vestibule will be assessed using a vulvalgesiometer. The vulvalgesiometer is an instrument that provides a measure of pain/sensitivity that can be standardized across time points. The vulvalgesiometer is calibrated to exert a fixed amount of pressure. In this study, 30 grams of pressure at the 1, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, and 11 o'clock positions (randomly) around the vestibule will be applied using the vulvalgestiometer. Women will also report their pain at each site using a numeric rating scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain ever).
Pre-treatment, one month post-treatment and 6 months post-treatment.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Self-reported Pain During Penetration
Time Frame: Pre-treatment,one month post-treatment, and 6 months follow-up.
The investigators will measure self-report of pain during attempted or completed intercourse (or dildo entry for non-heterosexual women). Numeric Rating Scale that asked participants to rate the "intensity of pain during vaginal penetration attempts with sexual intercourse or penetration over the past 4 weeks" This question was rated on a 0 to 10 scale from no pain (0) to worst possible pain (10).
Pre-treatment,one month post-treatment, and 6 months follow-up.
Sexual Function
Time Frame: Pre-treatment, one month post-treatment, and 6 months post-treatment.

The investigators will examine women's self-reported sexual function by administering the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI). The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) is a 19-item self-report questionnaire which assesses sexual function in women. It covers six sexual domains: lubrication, arousal, desire, pain, orgasm and satisfaction. Scores range from 7.2 - 36 where increase in sexual dysfunction is represented by lower scores.

Subscales:

Desire- 2, 3 [Subscale scores Range: 1.2 - 6] Arousal- 5,6,7,8 [Subscale Scores Range: 1.2 - 6] Lubrication- 9,10,11,12 [Subscale Scores Range: 1.2 - 6] Orgasm- 13, 14, 15 [Subscale Scores Range: 1.2 - 6] Satisfaction- 1, 16, 17 [Subscale Scores Range: 1.2 - 6] Pain- 18, 19, 20 [Subscale Scores Range: 1.2 - 6] Extra item: (4) have you been sexually active in past 4 weeks? (yes/no) [Scores Range 0 (no) - 1 (yes)]

Note: Ranges applicable only if question 4 was answered "yes".

Pre-treatment, one month post-treatment, and 6 months post-treatment.
Sexual Distress
Time Frame: Pre-treatment, one month post-treatment, and 6 months post-treatment.
The investigators will examine women's self-reported sexual distress by administering the Female Sexual Distress Scale-Revised. This is a 12-item self-report questionnaire assessing for sexuality related personal distress. Scores on the scale range from 0 - 48, where higher scores represent higher levels of distress.
Pre-treatment, one month post-treatment, and 6 months post-treatment.
Pain Catastrophizing
Time Frame: Pre-treatment, one month post-treatment, and 6 months post-treatment..

The investigators will examine women's self-reported pain catastrophizing by administering the Pain Catastrophizing Scale. The Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) is a self-report questionnaire that asks participants to think about past painful experiences, or a specific experience of pain, and to indicate the degree to which they have any of the presented thoughts or feelings when they are experiencing pain. Each one of the 13-items is rated on a Likert scale from 0 (not at all) to 4 (all the time), where a higher total score indicates higher pain catastrophizing.

Subscales: Rumination- (4 items) 8, 9, 10, and 11 [Scores Range: 0 - 16] Magnification- (3 items) 6, 7, and 13 [Scores Range: 0 - 12] Helplessness- (6 items) 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 12 [Scores Range: 0 - 24] Sum of all items [Overall Range: 0 - 52]

Pre-treatment, one month post-treatment, and 6 months post-treatment..
Pain Hypervigilance
Time Frame: Pre-treatment, one month post-treatment, and 6 months post treatment.
The investigators will examine women's self-reported hypervigilance about pain by administering the Pain Vigilance and Awareness Questionnaire. The Pain Vigilance and Awareness Questionnaire (PVAQ) is a 16 item self-report measure to assess the awareness, vigilance, preoccupation and observation of pain. Sum total score [Scores Range: 0 - 80].
Pre-treatment, one month post-treatment, and 6 months post treatment.
Chronic Pain Acceptance, Activities Engagement
Time Frame: Pre-treatment, one month post-treatment, and 6 months post-treatment.

The investigators will examine women's self-reported pain acceptance, activities engagement, by administering the CPAQ chronic pain acceptance questionnaire. The Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ) measures the degree of acceptance of pain by chronic pain patients. It consists of 20 items measuring two domains, Activities Engagement and Pain Willingness. Total score range is from 0 - 120, with higher scores indicating higher levels of pain acceptance.

Subscales:

Activities engagement (11 items)- Q 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12, 15, 19 [Scores Range: 0 - 66] Pain willingness (9 items)- Q 4, 7, 11, 13, 14, 16, 17, 18, 20 [Scores Range: 0 - 54]

Pre-treatment, one month post-treatment, and 6 months post-treatment.
Chronic Pain Acceptance, CPAQ Pain Willingness
Time Frame: Pre-treatment, one month post-treatment, and 6 months post treatment.

The investigators will examine women's self-reported pain acceptance, activities engagement, by administering the CPAQ chronic pain acceptance questionnaire. The Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ) measures the degree of acceptance of pain by chronic pain patients. It consists of 20 items measuring two domains: Activities Engagement and Pain Willingness. Total score range is from 0 - 120, with higher scores indicating higher levels of pain acceptance.

Subscales:

Activities engagement (11 items)- Q 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12, 15, 19 [Scores Range: 0 - 66] Pain willingness (9 items)- Q 4, 7, 11, 13, 14, 16, 17, 18, 20 [Scores Range: 0 - 54]

Pre-treatment, one month post-treatment, and 6 months post treatment.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 22, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 9, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

October 11, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 10, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 25, 2020

Last Verified

February 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Provoked Vestibulodynia

Clinical Trials on Mindfulness-based Cognitive Therapy

3
Subscribe