Vitamin D and Cardiac Autonomic Tone in Hemodialysis (VITAH)

August 29, 2016 updated by: Sofia Ahmed, University of Calgary

Vitamin D Supplementation and Cardiac Autonomic Tone in Hemodialysis Patients: A Blinded, Randomized-controlled Trial

Despite advances in treatment of conventional cardiovascular risk factors, patients with kidney disease remain at high risk for fatal cardiac events. To date, kidney disease affects approximately 2 million Canadians; however, this patient population remains grossly understudied due to the complex nature of the disease. The inadequacy of the literature to address the cardiovascular-related mortality rates in those with kidney disease reflects the urgent need for investigation of novel risk factors.

One cardiovascular risk factor which has recently been validated is the clinical measurement of cardiac autonomic tone (CAT). CAT refers to the amount of activity contributed by the stimulatory and inhibitory limbs of the cardiac autonomic nervous system, which work in concert with one another to control heart rate. CAT can be quantified computer analysis of heart rate over time, captured by a simple Holter electrocardiogram (ECG) recording. Abnormal CAT, which occurs when the autonomic system does not control heart rate properly in response to physical demands or stress, is associated with risk of adverse cardiovascular events in both healthy and high risk populations. It has recently been shown that patients with severe kidney disease demonstrate significant CAT abnormalities, thus exaggerated susceptibility to cardiac death.

Vitamin D (VD) deficiency is also common in this patient population due to the fact that the kidney plays a crucial role in VD metabolism. Given that VD deficiency is an established cardiovascular risk factor on its own, it is possible that kidney disease patients experienced compounded risk due to the combination of VD deficiency and abnormal CAT. However, no study has ever investigated whether VD deficiency influences CAT in healthy or diseased populations. To our knowledge, this will be the first trial to ever examine the effect, if any, of different VD supplementation treatments (standard of care vs. combination) on CAT in a population burdened with overwhelming risk and incidence of cardiovascular and sudden cardiac death risk.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

56

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alberta
      • Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T2R 0X7
        • Sheldon M. Chumir Health Centre
      • Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T2L 2J8
        • Northland Hemodialysis Clinic
      • Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T2N 2T9
        • Foothills Medical Centre - University of Calgary

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age ≥ 18 years
  • 3x weekly hemodialysis outpatient within Calgary for at least 3 months prior to enrolment
  • physician consent to participate in VD supplementation regimen
  • ability and agreement to cease any VD medication for 4 weeks prior to initiation of study
  • able to comprehend study and provide oral and written consent in English

Exclusion Criteria:

  • any major cardiovascular event (new onset arrhythmia, hospitalization for a cardiac event) noted in patient chart within the 6 month period prior to initiation of the study
  • currently on VD therapy/refusal to cease VD therapy for 4 weeks prior to initiation of study
  • physician anticipates death or adverse event within the next year- known discharge from hemodialysis (transfer to peritoneal dialysis, kidney transplant)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Vitamin D Sequence 1
6 weeks - alfacalcidol 0.25mcg + placebo 3x per week, 12 week washout, 6 weeks - alfacalcidol 0.25mcg 3x per week + 50,000IU ergocalciferol 1x per week (placebo the 2 remaining days)
0.25 mcg 3x per week for 6 weeks
50,000IU 1x per week for 6 weeks
Active Comparator: Vitamin D Treatment Sequence 2
6 weeks - alfacalcidol 0.25mcg 3x per week + 50,000IU ergocalciferol 1x per week (placebo the 2 remaining days), 12 week washout, 6 weeks - alfacalcidol 0.25mcg + placebo 3x per week
0.25 mcg 3x per week for 6 weeks
50,000IU 1x per week for 6 weeks

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
LF:HF
Time Frame: change from baseline to 6 weeks
Low frequency to high frequency ratio (sympathetic vs. parasympathetic cardiac autonomic power)
change from baseline to 6 weeks
LF:HF
Time Frame: change from 6 weeks to 18 weeks
Low frequency to high frequency ratio (sympathetic vs. parasympathetic cardiac autonomic power)
change from 6 weeks to 18 weeks
LF:HF
Time Frame: change from 18 weeks to 24 weeks
Low frequency to high frequency ratio (sympathetic vs. parasympathetic cardiac autonomic power)
change from 18 weeks to 24 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
SDNN
Time Frame: every 6 weeks up to 24 weeks
standard deviation of normal wave (heart rate variability time domain)
every 6 weeks up to 24 weeks
SDANN
Time Frame: every 6 weeks up to 24 weeks
standard deviation of the average normal wave (heart rate variability time domain)
every 6 weeks up to 24 weeks
pNN50%
Time Frame: every 6 weeks up to 24 weeks
percentage of normal waves which differ in frequency > 50 ms compared to the wave directly before (heart rate variability time domain)
every 6 weeks up to 24 weeks
LF
Time Frame: every 6 weeks up to 24 weeks
Low-frequency (ms squared and normalized units), thought to reflect sympathetic contribution from the cardiac autonomic nervous system
every 6 weeks up to 24 weeks
HF
Time Frame: every 6 weeks up to 24 weeks
High-frequency (ms squared and normalized units), thought to reflect parasympathetic contribution from the cardiac autonomic nervous system
every 6 weeks up to 24 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
25-hydroxy vitamin D
Time Frame: every 6 weeks up to 24 weeks
every 6 weeks up to 24 weeks
1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D
Time Frame: every 6 weeks up to 24 weeks
every 6 weeks up to 24 weeks
Parathyroid hormone
Time Frame: every 6 weeks up to 24 weeks
every 6 weeks up to 24 weeks
Calcium
Time Frame: every 6 weeks up to 24 weeks
every 6 weeks up to 24 weeks
Phosphate
Time Frame: every 6 weeks up to 24 weeks
every 6 weeks up to 24 weeks
Pre- and post-dialysis weight
Time Frame: every 6 weeks up to 24 weeks
every 6 weeks up to 24 weeks
Epinephrine
Time Frame: every 6 weeks up to 24 weeks
every 6 weeks up to 24 weeks
Norepinephrine
Time Frame: every 6 weeks up to 24 weeks
every 6 weeks up to 24 weeks
Renin-angiotensin system activity (circulating)
Time Frame: every 6 weeks up to 24 weeks
renin, angiotensin II, aldosterone
every 6 weeks up to 24 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Dr. Sofia B Ahmed, MD, MMSc, University of Calgary
  • Principal Investigator: Dr. Derek Exner, MD, MPH, University of Calgary, Libin Cardiovascular Institute
  • Principal Investigator: Dr. Brenda Hemmelgarn, MD, PhD, MN, University of Calgary

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 17, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 21, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

January 24, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

August 31, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 29, 2016

Last Verified

August 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cardiovascular Disease

Clinical Trials on Alfacalcidol

3
Subscribe