Assessment of Distal Limbs Fractures With Cone-Beam CT Newtom 5G (FRADICOBE)

May 23, 2019 updated by: Hospices Civils de Lyon
ConeBeam scanner (CBCT) is a widely technique used for dental and maxillofacial imaging. Patients can be set up in a sitting or a laying position in the, Newtom 5G CBCT allowing for an analysis of the distal appendicular skeleton. The investigators' hypothesis is that the cone-beam scanner could detect and characterize fractures of the extremities similarly to a multidetector CT (MDCT). 150 patients over 18 years requiring a CT scan for a suspected distal limb fracture or a preoperative assessment will be enrolled. The primary endpointis based on the ability of cone-beam scanner to properly characterize the type of fracture using a classification derived from Maurice E. Müller (AO) classification. Secondary endpoints will concern the depiction of the fracture, the assessment of the soft tissues near the fracture, quality of images, inter and intra-operator reproducibility and tolerance of the patient for the examination. Patients will have a MDCT considered as the reference exam, then a CBCT. Exams will be anonymized and read twice by two trained radiologists with 3-6 week intervals. The inter-observer agreement for the diagnosis of fracture type between the two techniques will be evaluated by a kappa coefficient. The evaluation of diagnostic performance will be achieved by studying the sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value and positive predictive value, and its likelihood ratio. Kappa test will be performed to evaluate the consistency of the characterization of the fracture and the evaluation of soft tissue near the fracture. A Student t test will be performed for paired data if distributions are normal, a Wilcoxon test if not. To assess patient's tolerance, the percentages of (painful, not painful) will be calculated for each technique and will be compared using the Chi2 test (or Fisher's exact test if the chi can not apply).

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

43

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Lyon, France, 69003
        • Hospices Civils de Lyon- Hôpital Edouard Herriot

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient age 18 years old or above, weight ≤ 160 Kg
  • Patient require MDCT for a suspected distal limb fracture or a preoperative assessment
  • French spoken an read
  • Free and informed consent signed
  • Being affiliated to a French social security system or similar.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients already included in the study for a previous fracture
  • Patient with severe pain and reduced spontaneous mobility that could prevent proper positioning for the cone-beam
  • Lack of effective contraception (risk of pregnancy) or pregnancy proven data on interrogations
  • Patient on protection of the court, under supervision or trusteeship
  • Inability to express a consent
  • Patients already enrolled in a study with a conflict of interest with this study.
  • The presence of osteosynthesis materiel or capital may interfere with image quality. A sample of 3 to 5 patients may be included at the beginning of the study to test the image quality in presence of material.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Conventional and a cone-beam scanner 5G
The patients will have a conventional scanner, a reference examination, and a cone-beam scanner Newtom 5G just after the conventional scanner

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Characterization of the type of fracture using a classification derived from Maurice E. Müller (AO) classification
Time Frame: From the day of the trauma for acute injuries to the first weeks when an occult fracture is suspected
From the day of the trauma for acute injuries to the first weeks when an occult fracture is suspected

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assessment of soft tissues peripheral to the fracture
Time Frame: Baseline only, the day the scanner is performed.
Articular fluid, hematoma, tendinous or ligamentous lesions
Baseline only, the day the scanner is performed.
Image quality (for CBCT and MDCT)
Time Frame: Baseline only, the day the scanner is performed
0 - Insufficient, 1 - Poor, 2 - Average, 3 - Good, 4 - Excellent
Baseline only, the day the scanner is performed
Tolerability and duration of the exam (for CBCT and MDCT)
Time Frame: Baseline only, the day the scanner is performed
Perfect, tolerable, hardly tolerable, intolerable
Baseline only, the day the scanner is performed
Duration of the exam (for CBCT and MDCT)
Time Frame: Baseline only, the day the scanner is performed
Perfect, tolerable, hardly tolerable, intolerable
Baseline only, the day the scanner is performed
Inter-intra-observer reproducibility
Time Frame: Bseline only, the scanner is performed.
2 readings for each operator, with consensus reading for disagreements
Bseline only, the scanner is performed.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jean-Baptiste PIALAT, MD,PHD, Hospices Civils de Lyon- Hôpital Edouard Herriot

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 30, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 19, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

February 22, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 28, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 23, 2019

Last Verified

March 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2012.710

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Distal Limbs Bones Fractures

3
Subscribe