Retrospective Study: Efficacy and Safety of Chlorambucil + Rituximab in CLL Patients

A Retrospective Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Chlorambucil Plus Rituximab as Front-line Therapy in Elderly and/or Unfit Patients Affected by B-cell Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

This is a non interventional study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Chlorambucil plus Rituximab as firstline therapy in elderly and/or unfit patients affected by B-cell Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (B-CLL).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Illness: treatment overview Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (B-CLL) is the most prevalent adult leukemia among western countries (6.7% Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas- NHL). The incidence rate is 2-6 cases per 100.000 person per year increasing with age and reaching an incidence rate of about 13/100.000 at 65 years, median age of onset of the disease. There are two clinical staging systems currently in use for CLL (Rai and Binet staging systems) allowing a rough division of patients into three prognostic groups: good, intermediate and poor prognosis. The clinical course ranges from an indolent behaviour (Rai 0, Binet A) with a long term survival to an aggressive disease with a median survival of 2 years (Rai III and IV, Binet C). There is non survival benefit associated with an early therapy (Binet stage A and B). Treatment usually is initiated when patient progress to the advanced stage (Binet stage C) and/or become symptomatic (fever, night sweats, weight loss). Purine-analogues based chemo-immunotherapy regimens are now considered the standard of care for fit patient with B-CLL (Fludarabine-Cyclophosphamyde-Rituximab, FCR regimen). But aging of the host and biological features of the disease are critical issues in the choice of therapy. The FCR regimen can result in significant myelosuppression and a high rate of early and late infections, especially in elderly patients with B-CLL, suggesting that it may be too toxic and therefore unsuitable for the large subpopulation of elderly and comorbid patients affected by B-CLL/SLL.

Rationale Chlorambucil, an alkylating agent, was the standard first line treatment for B-CLL/SLL before the development of the purine analogues and monoclonal antibodies. Later, phase III trials showed an improved ORR and a prolongation of PFS with fludarabine alone. A further improvement was obtained with the addition of Cyclophosphamide to Fludarabine. Eventually, Fludarabine in combination with Cyclophosphamide and the monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody Rituximab became the standard first line therapy for CLL patients 18 to 65 years old. At the same time, the FCR regimen showed a significant rate of early toxicity consisting of myelosuppression and infection and also a high rate of late infection. Data showed by Hallek et al reported a rate of grade 3-4 hematological toxicity and total infections of 56% and 25%, respectively. They reported 8 treatment-related deaths (2%), five of these due to infections and 4 deaths occurring before the 3th cycle. Also has been reported by Tam et al a risk of 10% of late infection for the first year of remission after FCR treatment. Low-dose FCR was evaluated as an alternative option showing a lower rate of neutropenia, without reduction of response rate. Nevertheless, it was demonstrated to reduce the PFS and it has not been evaluated in the elderly or medically unfit population. Alternative treatments (i.e., low-dose fludarabine, low-dose fludarabine plus cyclophosphamide, rituximab alone) have been explored in phase II trials in elderly and/or medically unfit patients with CLL. Since the cohort sizes were small, however, no definitive recommendations could be made for clinical practice. About three-quarters of CLL patients are more than 65 years old. Data from the CLL 5 phase III trial of GCLLSG (German CLL study group) comparing fludarabine vs Chlorambucil in this setting of patients (median age 70 years, range 65-80 years) displayed no differences in OS and PFR between Fludarabine and Chl, despite a greater percentage of CR and ORR with Fludarabine. This suggests that in elderly B-CLL patients, Fludarabine alone does not represent a major benefit in respect of Chl as front-line therapy. However, rates of complete response (CR) with front-line Chlorambucil single agent are relatively low (up to 7%) as are overall responses (approximately 65%). Phase II trials are ongoing to investigate the efficacy and safety of Rituximab in combination with Chl in previously untreated patients affected by B-CLL.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

100

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Ascoli Piceno, Italy
        • U.O.C. Ematologia e Terapia Cellulare - Ospedale "C. e G. Mazzoni" di Ascoli Piceno
      • Barletta, Italy
        • UOC Ematologia Ospedale " Monsignor Raffaele Dimiccoli"
      • Catanzaro, Italy
        • Azienda Ospedaliera Pugliese Ciaccio - Presidio Ospedaliero A.Pugliese - Unità Operativa di Ematologia
      • Ferrara, Italy
        • Sezione di Ematologia e Fisiopatologia delle Emostasi
      • Firenze, Italy
        • Policlinico di Careggi
      • Foggia, Italy
        • Struttura Complessa di Ematologia Ospedali Riuniti Foggia - Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria
      • Messina, Italy
        • Divisione di Ematologia - Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti "Papardo Piemonte"
      • Modena, Italy
        • UO Ematologia - AOU Policlinico di Modena
      • Nocera Inferiore, Italy
        • U.O. di Oncoematologia di Nocera Inferiore-plesso ospedaliero "A. Tortora" di Pagani del DEA Nocera-Pagani
      • Parma, Italy
        • Cattedra di Ematologia CTMO Università degli Studi di Parma
      • Pesaro, Italy
        • Div. di Ematologia di Muraglia - CTMO Ospedale San Salvatore
      • Reggio Calabria, Italy
        • Dipartimento Emato-Oncologia A.O."Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli"
      • Rionero in Vulture, Italy
        • U.O. di Ematologia - Centro Oncologico Basilicata
      • Roma, Italy
        • U.O.C. Ematologia - Ospedale S.Eugenio
      • Roma, Italy
        • Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore - Policlinico A. Gemelli
      • Roma, Italy
        • U.O.S.A. Ematologia ASL RMA Presidio Nuovo Regina Margherita
      • Roma, Italy
        • Università degli studi "Sapienza" di Roma
      • Terni, Italy
        • A.O. Santa Maria - Terni S.C Oncoematologia
      • Torino, Italy
        • Divisione di Ematologia dell' Università degli Studi di Torino - "Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino"
      • Trieste, Italy
        • Struttura Complessa II Medicina - Ematologia - Centro di Riferimento Ematologico - Ospedale Maggiore

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The GIMEMA Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Working Party promotes an observational, retrospective, multicenter study on safety and efficacy of Chl-R administered front-line to treat elderly and/or unfit pts affected by B-CLL.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Have a diagnosis of B-CLL or Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma (SLL) according to the World Health Organisation (WHO) classification 2008;
  • Previously untreated B-CLL requiring therapy according to the NCI criteria (Hallek M et al, Blood 2008 (Appendix G) undergone to first line of therapy with Chl-R;
  • All patients included in the study must have started treatment by December 2011;
  • Age ≥ 65 years or unfit pts ≥ 18 years old with a CIRS score ≥7 (Appendix E);
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status Grade of 0-2 (Appendix B) ;
  • Life expectancy > 6 months;
  • Signed written informed consent according to ICH/EU/GCP and national local law.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who have received prior therapy: chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy, stem cell transplantation, investigational drugs administered to treat B-CLL before Chl-R;
  • Transformation of B-CLL to aggressive lymphomas (Richter's Syndrome);
  • One or more individual organ/system impairment score of 4 as assessed by CIRS definition;
  • HIV infection;
  • Active, uncontrolled HCV and/or HBV infections or liver cirrhosis;
  • Patients who started Chl-R after December 2011.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Only
  • Time Perspectives: Retrospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Study group
Patients receiving Chlorambucil plus Rituximab

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of responding patients.
Time Frame: 10 months from study entry
Overall response rate.
10 months from study entry

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of adverse events.
Time Frame: 24 months from study entry
Safety of Rituximab and Chlorambucil regimen (type, frequency and severity).
24 months from study entry
Number of days from the first dose of treatment to re-treatment.
Time Frame: 24 months from study entry.
Time to Re-Treatment (TTR) estimation starting from the date of the first dose of the study drug
24 months from study entry.
Number of patients surviving.
Time Frame: 24 months from study entry.

Progression Free Survival (PFS) estimation starting from the date of the first dose of the study drug.

Overall Survival (OS) estimation starting from the date of the first dose of the study drug

24 months from study entry.
Number of patients in which the response and the biological and clinical characteristics of the disease at baseline are associated.
Time Frame: After 10 months from study entry.
Fitness status, FISH, IgVH, Zap70 and CD38.
After 10 months from study entry.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Luca Laurenti, Dr., Istituto di Ematologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore di Roma

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2018

Study Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 17, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 22, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

May 24, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 22, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 21, 2018

Last Verified

March 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Elderly Patients

3
Subscribe