- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01895166
EBUS-GS-TBLB With or Without Fluoroscopy for the Diagnosis of PPLs
July 30, 2013 updated by: Jiayuan Sun, Shanghai Chest Hospital
Diagnostic Value of Endobronchial Ultrasound(EBUS) With a Guide Sheath(GS) for Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions(PPLs) Without Fluoroscopy: a Randomized Controlled Trial
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of endobronchial ultrasound-guide sheath(EBUS-GS) for the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs) without radiographic fluoroscopy.
Study Overview
Detailed Description
The investigators evaluated the efficacy and safety of transbronchial biopsy (TBB) and bronchial brushing by endobronchial ultrasonography (EBUS) with a guide sheath (GS) as a guide for diagnosing peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs) without radiographic fluoroscopy.The study is designed as a two-center prospective randomized controlled trial.
The participating centers are Department of pulmonary medicine and endoscope center, Shanghai chest Hospital affiliated to Shanghai JiaoTong University School, China.
Department of pulmonary medicine, Fukushima Medical University, Japan.Patients are divided into two groups, EBUS-GS-X-ray group and EBUS-GS group.Each subject will be randomized to each group.The study is expected to enroll 100 patients at 2 centers (China:75, Fukushima:25).
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Anticipated)
100
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Shanghai, China, 200030
- Recruiting
- Shanghai Chest Hospital
-
Contact:
- Jiayuan Sun
- Email: jysun1976@163.com
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
1. Individuals eligible for inclusion are patients that the CT scan appearance of the PPLs showed the longest diameter was more than 2 cm and solid lesions.
Exclusion Criteria:
- The lesion is close to the pleural membrane
- Refusal of participation
- Severe cardiopulmonary dysfunction and other indications that can't receive bronchoscopy
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: EBUS-GS group
The EBUS probe and GS are confirmed to reach the lesion by EBUS images alone, cytologic and pathologic specimens are obtained without fluoroscopic guidance.
|
EBUS is performed using an endoscope ultrasound system , which is equipped with a 20-MHz mechanical radial-type probe (UM-S20-17S;Olympus) with an external diameter of 1.4 mm and a GS (K-201; Olympus).
|
|
Active Comparator: EBUS-GS-X-ray group
The EBUS probe and GS are confirmed to reach the lesion by EBUS images and radiograph fluoroscopy, cytologic and pathologic specimens are obtained under fluoroscopic guidance.
|
EBUS is performed using an endoscope ultrasound system , which is equipped with a 20-MHz mechanical radial-type probe (UM-S20-17S;Olympus) with an external diameter of 1.4 mm and a GS (K-201; Olympus).
The radiograph fluoroscopy are performed when the probe and GS are confirmed to reach the lesion by EBUS images ,cytologic and pathologic specimens are obtained under fluoroscopic guidance.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The difference of diagnostic value of EBUS-GS-TBLB with fluoroscopy as compared to EBUS-GS-TBLB alone
Time Frame: Up to half year
|
The diagnostic value mean sensitivity and specificity in two groups
|
Up to half year
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The difference of complications of EBUS-GS-TBLB with fluoroscopy as compared to EBUS-GS-TBLB alone
Time Frame: Up to half year
|
Complications mean a composite of operation-related serious adverse events (pneumothorax, bleeding, etc.) during and after the operation in two groups
|
Up to half year
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Kurimoto N, Miyazawa T, Okimasa S, Maeda A, Oiwa H, Miyazu Y, Murayama M. Endobronchial ultrasonography using a guide sheath increases the ability to diagnose peripheral pulmonary lesions endoscopically. Chest. 2004 Sep;126(3):959-65. doi: 10.1378/chest.126.3.959.
- Yoshikawa M, Sukoh N, Yamazaki K, Kanazawa K, Fukumoto S, Harada M, Kikuchi E, Munakata M, Nishimura M, Isobe H. Diagnostic value of endobronchial ultrasonography with a guide sheath for peripheral pulmonary lesions without X-ray fluoroscopy. Chest. 2007 Jun;131(6):1788-93. doi: 10.1378/chest.06-2506.
- Yamada N, Yamazaki K, Kurimoto N, Asahina H, Kikuchi E, Shinagawa N, Oizumi S, Nishimura M. Factors related to diagnostic yield of transbronchial biopsy using endobronchial ultrasonography with a guide sheath in small peripheral pulmonary lesions. Chest. 2007 Aug;132(2):603-8. doi: 10.1378/chest.07-0637. Epub 2007 Jun 15.
- Steinfort DP, Khor YH, Manser RL, Irving LB. Radial probe endobronchial ultrasound for the diagnosis of peripheral lung cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Respir J. 2011 Apr;37(4):902-10. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00075310. Epub 2010 Aug 6.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
July 1, 2013
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
June 1, 2014
Study Completion (Anticipated)
June 1, 2014
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
March 25, 2013
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
July 9, 2013
First Posted (Estimate)
July 10, 2013
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
July 31, 2013
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
July 30, 2013
Last Verified
July 1, 2013
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- SHCHE201301
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.