Surgical Site Infection Rate After Intra-Abdominal Surgery Using Negative Pressure Wound Therapy at Initial Closure

January 2, 2020 updated by: Johns Hopkins University

Surgical Site Infection (SSI) Rate After Intra-Abdominal Surgery Using Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) at Initial Closure

The goal of this study is to present a large single-institution experience reporting surgical site infection rates in patients who have undergone intra-abdominal surgery followed by wound closure with Negative Pressure Wound Therapy. A retrospective review of patients' charts will be conducted to analyze surgical site infection rates between wound closure with and without Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT). American College of Surgeons National Quality Improvement Program data from previous standard of care (primary closure after colorectal surgery) will be used for comparison with newly adopted standard of care treatment regimen (wound closure with NPWT).

Data on patients who underwent intra-abdominal surgery will be retrospectively collected and a database will be created. These individuals will be identified through medical records and recontacted by mail and/or phone to collect study data.

Finally, patients newly referred to the Principal Investigator for intra-abdominal surgery will be enrolled in the database. After giving informed consent, data on surgical site infection rates and outcomes will be collected. Longitudinal outcomes will be assessed at 30 days, 6 months, and 12 months post-operatively. These patients' outcomes will be compared to a group of patients treated by the Principal Investigator who also underwent intra-abdominal surgery without Negative Pressure Wound Therapy. We hypothesize that fewer patients treated with negative pressure wound therapy following intra-abdominal surgery will develop surgical site infections than patients who had intra-abdominal surgery but were not treated with Negative Pressure Wound Therapy.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Duration of individual study participation will last approximately one year for prospectively enrolled participants. Data collection for retrospectively enrolled patients will span approximately 12 months.

Study data will not be collected on subjects until eligibility is confirmed and the patient is assigned a study number.

All information will be collected in a secure study-specific electronic registry database. The data will be reviewed for completeness and accuracy by the Principal Investigator. This is an observational registry which does not include an investigatory agent and poses minimal risk to the participants. Thus, the monitoring will be done by the study personnel - an independent board is not necessary.

This study will use the descriptions and grading scales found in the revised National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4. Information about all adverse events, whether volunteered by the subject, discovered by the investigator, or detected through physical examination, laboratory test, or other means, will be collected, recorded, and followed as appropriate. All adverse events experienced by participants will be collected and reported from the time of consent until the Day 30 follow-up appointment, as appropriate. Thereafter, only adverse events of interest (i.e., death, additional hospitalization, surgical site infection, surgical site occurrence) will be recorded. Participants who have an ongoing adverse event related to the study procedures may continue to be periodically contacted by a member of the study staff until the event has resolved or determine to be irreversible by the principal investigator. All adverse events and serious adverse events will be reported to the Johns Hopkins Medicine Institutional Review Board.

To generate a large data set that may be used to answer various research questions, enrollment will continue for at least 10 years, generating an estimated patient sample size of n=1200. The study team anticipates enrolling 100-150 patients in the study registry per year over 10 years.

Simple descriptive statistics will be used to determine the rate of SSIs in colorectal surgery patients. This rate will be compared with the SSI rate published in literature to determine if implementation of negative pressure wound therapy wound closure following colorectal surgery decreases the rate of SSIs in colorectal surgery patients. A hypothesis test will be used to determine if there is a difference before and after adoption of negative pressure wound therapy wound closure. Enrollment of subjects over several years will enable further analyses with the possibility of stratification according to different patient characteristics.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

400

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21287
        • Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All patients greater than or equal to 18 years of age undergoing intra-abdominal surgery at Johns Hopkins Hospital by Dr. Frederic Eckhauser. Both men and women and members of all races and ethnic groups are eligible.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Greater than or equal to 18 years of age
  • Undergoing intra-abdominal surgery at Johns Hopkins Hospital by Dr. Frederic Eckhauser

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Less than 18 years of age
  • Pregnant females

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Prospective
Patients newly referred to the Principal Investigator for intra-abdominal surgery and for whom the Principal Investigator anticipates using Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy.
Retrospective
Patients who underwent intra-abdominal surgery by the Principal Investigator between January 1, 2011 and May 9, 2013 will be identified through patient medical records. Living patients will be contacted via letter from the Principal Investigator introducing the study along with the study's consent form for the patients' review. Interested patients will be consented either in person at the patient's next clinic visit or via telephone by a member of the study staff.
Historical Controls
Patients who underwent intra-abdominal surgery without Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy by the Principal Investigator prior to January 1, 2011 will be enrolled as Historical Controls.
De-Identified Retrospective
Patients who underwent intra-abdominal surgery by the Principal Investigator between January 1, 2011 and May 9, 2013 and are deceased or do not consent to be in the study will be enrolled in the De-Identified Retrospective Case Cohort.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Surgical site infection (per the 1999 Guideline for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection from the Hospital Infections Program at the National Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention).
Time Frame: Up to one year

Comparing surgical site infection (per the 1999 Guideline for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection from the Hospital Infections Program at the National Center for Infectious Diseases) rates between patients treated with and without negative pressure wound therapy.

Objective: To determine if a newly adopted standard of care [negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT)] for clean, clean-contaminated, and contaminated wounds will lead to decreased rates of post-operative surgical site infection.

Up to one year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Surgical site occurrence (per the 2010 Ventral Hernia Working Group's classification and the modified hernia grading scale by Kanters et al.; 2012).
Time Frame: Up to one year

Comparing surgical site occurrence (per the 2010 Ventral Hernia Working Group's classification and the modified hernia grading scale by Kanters et al.; 2012) rates between patients treated with and without negative pressure wound therapy.

Objective: To determine if a newly adopted standard of care [negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT)] for clean, clean-contaminated, and contaminated wounds will lead to decreased rates of post-operative surgical site occurrence.

Up to one year
Quantifying post-operative morbidity and mortality rates among patients undergoing bowel surgery with or without negative pressure wound therapy.
Time Frame: Up to one year
Objective: To determine if a newly adopted standard of care [negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT)] for clean, clean-contaminated, and contaminated wounds will improve outcomes of bowel surgery patients.
Up to one year

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quantifying post-operative morbidity and mortality rates among patients undergoing enterocutaneous fistula and ventral hernia repair with or without negative pressure wound therapy.
Time Frame: Up to one year
Objective: To determine morbidity and mortality secondary to enterocutaneous fistula and ventral hernia repair in this patient population.
Up to one year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Carisa Cooney, MPH, CCRP, Johns Hopkins University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 5, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 15, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

August 19, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 6, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 2, 2020

Last Verified

January 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Pooled data will be shared.

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Surgery

3
Subscribe