Investigation of Efficacy of incobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin) in Relieving Symptoms of Restless Leg Syndrome.

February 23, 2016 updated by: Yale University
The purpose of this research study is to compare the safety and effectiveness of local injections of botulinum toxin A (Xeomin®) to an inactive test substance (placebo) in a medical condition called Restless Leg Syndrome. This study has a double blind cross over design. Cross over means that you will have two sets of injections. The first set of injections can be either Xeomin or placebo. The order of injection will be reversed at the three month point following the first injection. Double blind means neither the investigators nor you know which one of the two (Xeomin or placebo) you received.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Please contact the PI for details about the clinical study.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

24

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Connecticut
      • New Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06510
        • Yale Physcian Building

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects 18- 80 years of age, both sexes, all races and ethnic groups.
  • Diagnosis of restless legs syndrome
  • Disease duration longer than 3 months
  • Restless Leg Syndrom Rating Scale score of 11 or above (moderate and above)
  • Subjects who are eligible to be treated with a botulinum toxin for a therapeutic reason based upon the physicians' clinical experience.
  • Subjects who are able to read, speak, and understand English.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Existing significant acute medical condition (i.e. cardiovascular, endocrine, hematologic, neoplastic, infectious, or autoimmune disorders).
  • Pregnancy or planned pregnancy (determined by urine pregnancy test). Women of childbearing age should use a reliable mode of contraception during the study period (abstinence, etc).
  • Active breast feeding.
  • Enrollment in any clinical trial (currently or within the past 3 months) in which treatments are imposed by a protocol.
  • Any subject for whom botulinum toxin treatment would be contraindicated; known allergy or sensitivity to medication.
  • Subjects who are younger than 18 years of age.
  • Neuromuscular-junction disorders.
  • Evidence of acute pathology by neuro-imaging.
  • Axis I diagnosis determined by a neurologist or psychiatrist.
  • Anesthetic medications within two weeks and corticosteroid injections within 4 weeks of enrollment.
  • Subject has received botulinum toxin injections in the past 4 months.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: CROSSOVER
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Placebo , saline
The subject may be randomly assigned to receive Placebo, saline
The subject may be randomly assigned to receive Placebo which is an inactive test substance which has no active ingredient. In this protocol we use sterile salt water as placebo.This study has a double blind cross over design. Cross over means that you will have two sets of injections. If the first set of injections is placebo, the second injections after a three month interval will be active study drug. Double blind means neither the investigators nor the subject knows which one of the two (Xeomin or placebo) is received with the first or second injections.
Other Names:
  • Sterile saline water
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: IncobotulinumtoxinA Treatment
The subjects will be randomized to received injections of active study drug, incobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin)
The subject may be randomly assigned to receive incobotulinum toxinA (Xeomin) , a neurotoxin Which is approved for use by the FDA for certain conditions. This study has a double blind cross over design. Cross over means that you will have two sets of injections. If the first set of injections is Xeomin, the second injections after a three month interval will be the inactive placebo. Double blind means neither the investigators nor the subject knows which one of the two (Xeomin or placebo) is received with the first or second injections.
Other Names:
  • Xeomin

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Total Restless Leg Syndrome Rating Scale Score
Time Frame: 6 weeks
The Restless Legs Syndrome Rating Scale uses 10 questions, each scored 0-4, with higher scores representing more severe symptoms. Score ranges from 1-40. Scoring criteria are: Mild (score 1-10); Moderate (score 11-20); Severe (score 21-30); Very severe (score 31-40)
6 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Patients Whose Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Moderately or Much Improved
Time Frame: 6 weeks

The PGIC is a 7 point scale that requires the clinician to assess how much the patient's pain has improved or worsened relative to a baseline state at the beginning of the intervention. and rated as:

No change (or condition has gotten worse) (1) Almost the same, hardly any change at all (2) A little better, but no noticeable change (3) Somewhat better, but the change has not made any real difference (4) Moderately better, and a slight but noticeable change (5) Better and a definite improvement that has made a real and worthwhile difference (6) A great deal better and a considerable improvement that has made all the difference (7)improved

This outcome is number of patients who chose a 5 or above on the PGIC 6 weeks after treatment.

6 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patients With Pain on Visual Analog Scale <4
Time Frame: 6 weeks
The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) consists of a line which represents the level of pain in 10 cms. The subject is required to make this line to show where your pain level is on this line (for example, at the 7cm mark). A higher score is associated with a higher level of pain. Number of patients showing a pain score of <4.
6 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2012

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

August 1, 2015

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

August 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 26, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 26, 2013

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

August 29, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

March 21, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 23, 2016

Last Verified

February 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Restless Leg Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Placebo

3
Subscribe