Escalating, Constant and Reduction Energy Output in SWL for Renal Stones (SWL)

Comparison of Escalating, Constant and Reduction Energy Output in SWL for Renal Stones: Multi-arm Prospective Randomized Study.

Research Problem: Shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) dramatically changed the management of renal and ureteral calculus disease. In vitro studies suggest that progressive increase in lithotripter energy output voltage could produce the best overall stone comminution in comparison with constant or deescalating energy output. However, it is possible that the beneficial impact of slow rate SWL on comminution of stones and stone free rates has masked any marginal benefits for energy output escalation. The Escalating SW method adds the benefit of less renal tissue injury.

Research Significance:The present study will signifies and evaluates the stone free rates of three groups of patients with renal stones treated with different SWL energy outputs (Escalating, Constant and Reduction energy output).

Research Objectives: The aim of this research project is to study the effect of dose adjustment strategies on success rate of Shock Wave Lithotripsy in the clinical setting and to optimize the conditions for successful Shock Wave Lithotripsy.

Research Methodology: This clinical trial will be conducted at a tertiary care university hospital. 150 patients referred to the Shock wave lithotripsy unit will be evaluated for eligibility to be randomized into three groups (Dose Escalation, Dose reduction and constant dose). Parameter of the three groups will be compared to detect the treatment difference.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Escalating SW amplitude treatment protocols have been shown to be safe on long-term with less harm to kidney tissue. This clinical trial will be conducted at a tertiary care university hospital. All patients referred to the SWL unit will be evaluated for eligibility to be randomized. Randomization process "complete" or "unrestricted" randomization was used to allocate patients to the three arms of the clinical trial where one patient was randomly assigned to one of the three arms blindly.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

150

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
        • King Khalid University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

30 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Single stone
  • Radio opaque
  • Less than 2cm in size
  • Renal stone

Exclusion Criteria:

  • bleeding disorder,
  • urinary tract infection (UTI)
  • distal ureteric obstruction

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Escalating Energy SWL
50 Patients
Dose escalation, 1500 SW at 18 kv, followed by 1500 SW at 20 kv and the following 1500 SW at 22 kv.
Experimental: Constant Energy SWL
50 Patients
Constant dose at 20 kv
Experimental: Reduction Energy SWL
50 Patients
Dose reduction, 1500 SW at 22 kv, followed by 1500 SW at 20 kv and the following at 18 kv.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Stone clearance after escalating shockwave lithotripsy
Time Frame: 14 days after escalating shockwave lithotripsy
All patients undergo for imaging investigation of the kidneys, ureters, or bladder (KUB) plain x-ray film at day 14 to assess stone free rate. Stone free was defined as no stones or painless fragments less than 4mm. In additions all patients received pre and post shockwave lithotripsy renal ultrasound on day 1 prior and day 1 shockwave lithotripsy to evaluate for shockwave lithotripsy related hematoma formation.
14 days after escalating shockwave lithotripsy

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Stone clearance after constant shockwave lithotripsy
Time Frame: 14 days after constant shockwave lithotripsy
All patients undergo for imaging investigation of the kidneys, ureters, or bladder (KUB) plain x-ray film at day 14 to assess stone free rate. Stone free was defined as no stones or painless fragments less than 4mm. In additions all patients received pre and post shockwave lithotripsy renal ultrasound on day 1 prior and day 1 shockwave lithotripsy to evaluate for shockwave lithotripsy related hematoma formation.
14 days after constant shockwave lithotripsy

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Stone clearance after reduction shockwave lithotripsy
Time Frame: 14 days after reduction shockwave lithotripsy
All patients undergo for imaging investigation of the kidneys, ureters, or bladder (KUB) plain x-ray film at day 14 to assess stone free rate. Stone free was defined as no stones or painless fragments less than 4mm. In additions all patients received pre and post shockwave lithotripsy renal ultrasound on day 1 prior and day 1 shockwave lithotripsy to evaluate for shockwave lithotripsy related hematoma formation.
14 days after reduction shockwave lithotripsy

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Danny M Rabah, Professor, College Of Medicine, King Saud University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 6, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 14, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

January 16, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 31, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 30, 2016

Last Verified

January 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 13/3948/IRB (Registry Identifier: Institutional Review Board)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

Results will be published in per-reviewed journal

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Renal Stones

Clinical Trials on Escalating Energy SWL

3
Subscribe