Comparing the Outcomes Between Rotator Cuff Repair With and Without Suprascapular Nerve Decompression

May 3, 2023 updated by: University of Chicago

Will Routine Suprascapular Nerve Release During Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Improve Patient Outcomes?

The purpose of the study is to compare the differences in outcome between the traditional rotator cuff repair surgery and rotator cuff repair with suprascapular nerve decompression surgery.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The suprascapular nerve is intimately related to the function and likely recovery of the rotator cuff musculature. Retracted rotator cuff tears have recently been shown to effect both the physical path in which the suprascapular nerve travels, as well as its physiologic function.

This study will be a randomized control trial with long term follow up that will add to and elaborate on the positive outcomes reported in other trials. Patients that have a rotator cuff tears with greater than or equal to 1 cm of retraction that have failed conservative treatment and require operative repair will qualify for the study. They will be randomized into two arms: In one arm, patients will undergo suprascapular nerve release immediately after their rotator cuff repair; they will be compared to patients that have rotator cuff repair with no release of the nerve. Post operatively, at different time intervals, patients will be expected to fill out multiple standardized, well established surveys that assess the patients pain level and shoulder function.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

36

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60637
        • The University of Chicago Medical Center
      • Evanston, Illinois, United States, 60201
        • NorthShore University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Reparable full thickness supraspinatus and or infraspinatus rotator cuff tears regardless of retraction

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients less than 18 years of age
  • Irreparable rotator cuff tears

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Rotator cuff repair without Suprascapular Nerve decompression
approximately 17 subjects in the study will receive traditional rotator cuff repair surgical intervention with no suprascapular nerve decompression surgical intervention
Traditional rotator cuff repair without Suprascapular nerve decompression
Active Comparator: Rotator Cuff Repair with Suprascapular Nerve decompression
approximately 17 subjects in the study will undergo rotator cuff repair with arthroscopic suprascapular nerve decompression surgical intervention
Traditional rotator cuff repair with Suprascapular nerve decompression

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Shoulder Score
Time Frame: one year
The scale measures pain from 0 to 10 and also includes a questionnaire for assessing the activity of daily living.
one year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Constant Shoulder Score
Time Frame: one year
It includes pain score, functional assessment, range of motion and strength measures
one year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Lewis L Shi, MD, University of Chicago
  • Principal Investigator: Jason Koh, MD, NorthShore University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 15, 2013

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2024

Study Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 4, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 7, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

April 8, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 5, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 3, 2023

Last Verified

May 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rotator Cuff Tear

Clinical Trials on Rotator Cuff Repair without Suprascapular Nerve decompression

3
Subscribe