Fosfomycin Versus Meropenem or Ceftriaxone in Bacteriemic Infections Caused by Multidrug Resistance in E.Coli (FOREST)

Phase 3, Randomized, Controlled Multicentric, Open-label Clinical Trial to Prove Non-Inferiority of Fosfomycin vs Meropenem or Ceftriaxone in the Treatment of Bacteriemic Urinary Infection Due to Multidrug Resistance in E.Coli

Enterobacterieaceae (and specially Escherichia coli) showing resistance due to multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli, plasmid mediated AmpC or quinolone resistance caused by chromosomal mechanisms have spread worldwide during the last decades. This is important because many of these isolates are also resistant to other first-line agents such as fluoroquinolones or aminoglycosides, leaving few available options for therapy, and this condition is associated with increased morbidity- mortality and length of hospital stay. While carbapenems are considered the drugs of choice for multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli and AmpC producers, recent data suggests that certain alternatives may be suitable for some types of infections.

At the present time, finding therapeutic alternatives to carbapenems and cephalosporins for the treatment of invasive infections due to multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli is critical. Fosfomycin was discovered more than 40 years ago but was not investigated according to present standards, and thus is not used in clinical practice except in desperate situations. It is one of the so-considered neglected antibiotics with high potential interest for the future.

With the aim of demonstrate the clinical non-inferiority of intravenous fosfomycin compared to meropenem or ceftriaxone in the treatment of bacteraemic urinary tract infections caused by multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli . The investigators propose a "real practise" randomised, controlled, multicentre phase III clinical trial to compare the clinical and microbiological efficacy and safety of intravenous fosfomycin (4 grammes every 6 hours) with meropenem (1 gramme every 8 hours) or ceftriaxone (1 gramme every 24 hours) as targeted therapy of the previously specified infection; change to oral therapy according to predefined options is allowed in both arms after 5 days. Follow-up for the study is planned up to 60 days.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The FOREST study is a phase 3, randomised, controlled, multicentric, open-label clinical trial to prove the noninferiority of fosfomycin versus meropenem in the targeted treatment of bacteraemic UTI due to ESBL-EC, designed as a real practice trial. It is a non-commercial, investigator-driven clinical study funded through a public competitive call by Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Spanish Ministry of Economy (PI13/01282).

The study is coordinated by investigators from Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena in Seville, Spain; the sponsorship is performed by Fundación Pública Andaluza para la Gestión de la Investigación en Salud de Sevilla (FISEVI), of which the sponsor-scientific responsibilities are delegated to the CTU (Clinical Trial Unit-Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville, Spain). All participating patients or their relatives must give written informed consent before any study procedures occur, including the withdrawal of biological samples for the study.

The hypothesis to test is that intravenous fosfomycin is not inferior to meropenem for the targeted treatment of bacteraemic UTI caused by ESBL-EC in terms of efficacy.

The primary objective of the study is to demonstrate that intravenous fosfomycin is not inferior to meropenem for reaching clinical and microbiological cure 5-7 days after the completion of treatment.

Secondary objectives include comparing the early clinical and microbiological response, 30-day mortality, hospital stay, recurrence rate, safety and impact on intestinal colonisation by MDR Gram-negative bacilli, evaluation of the rate of resistance development to fosfomycin and blood level concentration of fosfomycin.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

161

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Alicante, Spain
        • Hospital General Universitario de Alicante
      • Alicante, Spain, 03010
        • Hospital Marina Baixa
      • Barcelona, Spain, 08035
        • Hospital Vall d'Hebron
      • Barcelona, Spain
        • Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge
      • Barcelona, Spain, 08025
        • Hospital de la Santa Creu i San Pau
      • Barcelona, Spain, 08003
        • Hospital Parc Salud Mar
      • Bilbao, Spain
        • Hospital de Cruces
      • Burgos, Spain, 09006
        • Hospital Universitario de Burgos
      • Córdoba, Spain
        • Hospital Universitario Reina Sofia
      • Madrid, Spain, 28041
        • Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre
      • Madrid, Spain, 28034
        • Hospital Ramon y Cajal
      • Oviedo, Spain, 33006
        • Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias
      • Palma de Mallorca, Spain, 07010
        • Hospital Son Espases
      • Santander, Spain, 39008
        • Hospital Marques de Valdecilla
      • Sevilla, Spain, 41009
        • Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena
      • Valencia, Spain, 46026
        • Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe
      • Zaragoza, Spain, 50009
        • Hospital Royo Villanova
    • Barcelona
      • Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain, 08221
        • Hospital Mutua De Terrassa
    • Gran Canarias
      • Las Palmas De Gran Canaria, Gran Canarias, Spain, 35010
        • Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Dr. Negrin
    • Lleida
      • Vilanova, Lleida, Spain
        • Hospital Arnau de Vilanova
    • Murcia
      • El Palmar, Murcia, Spain, 30120
        • Hospital Clinico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca
    • Tenerife
      • La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain, 38320
        • Hospital Universitario de Canarias

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ≥18 years old hospitalized patients
  • Negative pregnancy test in fertile women
  • Episode of clinically-significant monomicrobial urinary BSI due to multidrug-resistant E.coli susceptible to fosfomycin and meropenem or ceftriaxone
  • Urinary sepsis with multidrug resistant E. coli isolation from the blood cultures, requires at least one clinical criteria and one of the following urinalysis criteria:

Clinical criteria

  • UTI symptoms (dysuriac, urgency, suprapubic pain or pollakiuria)
  • Lumbar back pain
  • Cost-vertebral angle tenderness
  • Altered mental status in people up to 70 years old
  • Intermittent or permanent indwelling foley catheter (or withdrawal during 24 hours previous) even without urinary symptoms urinalysis criteria
  • Urine dipstick test positive for either nitrites or leukocyte esterase
  • Positive urine culture - Signed informed consent form (ICF) executed prior to protocol screening assessments

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Polymicrobial bacteremia
  • No drainage of renal abscess or obstructive uropathy unresolved
  • Pregnant or careening women
  • Haematogenous infection
  • Other concomitant infection
  • Renal transplantation recipients
  • Polycystic kidney
  • Hypersensitivity and/or intolerance to meropenem or fosfomycin or ceftriaxone
  • Palliative care or life expectance < 90 days
  • Septic shock at time of randomization
  • New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional Class IV, hepatic cirrhosis or renal impairment receiving dialysis
  • Active empiric treatment >72 hours
  • Late randomization >24 hours after multidrug resistant.coli blood culture´s identification
  • Participation in other clinical trial with active treatment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Fosfomycin sodium intravenous
4g every 6 hours iv (60 min infusion)
4g every 6 hours iv (60 min infusion)
Other Names:
  • Generic name: Fosfomycin
  • Pharmaceutical form: solution for infusion
  • ATC code: J01J3
Active Comparator: Meropenem intravenous
1g every 8 hours (15-30 min infusion)
1g every 8 hours (15-30 min infusion) It depends on strain sensitivity: Strain with resistance to cephalosporins
Other Names:
  • Pharmaceutical form: solution for infusion
  • Generic name: Meropenem
  • ATC code: J01D5
Other: Ceftriaxone intravenous
1g every 24h (2-4 min)
1g every 24 hours iv (2-4 min infusion) It depends on strain sensitivity: Strain with resistance to quinolone but sensitivity to cephalosporins
Other Names:
  • Pharmaceutical form: solution for infusion
  • generic name: ceftriaxone
  • ATC code:J01DA

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical and microbiological cure rate
Time Frame: Day 5-7 after end of treatment (test of cure)

Clinical Cure: Complete resolution of infection symptoms (bacteremia and/or urinary tract infection-UTI-), present at the day on which blood culture was drawn.

Microbiological cure: Negative blood culture at day 5-7 after end of treatment. Besides this, if UTI was confirmed with a positive urine culture with the same microorganism than the blood culture, this culture should become negative.

Day 5-7 after end of treatment (test of cure)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Early clinical response
Time Frame: After 5 -7 days of complete treatment (from the first day of study drugs administration)
The infection was completely resolved after 5-7 days of complete treatment
After 5 -7 days of complete treatment (from the first day of study drugs administration)
Mortality
Time Frame: At day 30 of follow-up
Death for any reason.
At day 30 of follow-up
Length of hospital stay
Time Frame: At day 30 of follow-up
It is defined as the time from admission to hospital discharge
At day 30 of follow-up
Safety of intravenous fosfomycin in this indication
Time Frame: To the last visit, at 60 plus-minus 10 days (from the first day of study drugs administration)
Gathering any related adverse event from the informed consent form signature to the end of follow-up.
To the last visit, at 60 plus-minus 10 days (from the first day of study drugs administration)
Recurrences (relapse and reinfection) rate
Time Frame: To the last visit, at 60 plus-minus 10 days (from the first day of study drugs administration)

Relapse: new symptoms of UTI in patient with previously considered as clinical or microbiological cured in the visit of day 5-7 plus positive urine or blood cultures with the same microorganism isolated than the initial culture.

Re-infection: same definition but with different strain in the culture results.

To the last visit, at 60 plus-minus 10 days (from the first day of study drugs administration)
Fosfomycin steady-state plasma concentration
Time Frame: At 3 days after treatment started
Therapeutic drug monitoring of fosfomycin, basic pharmacokinetic parameters will be determined.
At 3 days after treatment started
Microbiota impact of study treatment bacilli
Time Frame: Screening, day 5-7, day 12
Study treatment impact in the gut colonization of MDRGNB (Multi drug resistant Gram negative bacilli)
Screening, day 5-7, day 12
Emergence of resistant clinical isolates of Escherichia coli to fosfomycin and meropenem
Time Frame: participants will be followed for the duration of fosfomycin, an expected average of 14 days
Frequency of strains that develop resistance and detection of resistance mechanisms in fosfomycin treatment arm.
participants will be followed for the duration of fosfomycin, an expected average of 14 days
Early microbiological response
Time Frame: within the first 5 days after treatment started
Cultures are negative
within the first 5 days after treatment started
Safety of intravenous antibiotic administration in this indication
Time Frame: To the last visit, at 60 plus-minus 10 days (from the first day of study drugs administration)
Gathering any related adverse event from the informed consent form signature to the end of follow-up.
To the last visit, at 60 plus-minus 10 days (from the first day of study drugs administration)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: JESUS RODRIGUEZ-BAÑO, MD, PhD, Spanish Network for Research in Infectious Diseases

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 13, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 16, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

May 20, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 6, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 2, 2019

Last Verified

August 1, 2019

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Infection Due to ESBL Escherichia Coli

Clinical Trials on Fosfomycin sodium intravenous

3
Subscribe