The Lumen Study: Comparing Devices for Patients With Symptomatic Femoro-popliteal Chronic Total Occlusion (CTO)

September 15, 2016 updated by: Yale University

A Prospective, Multicenter, Open Label Randomized Study to Evaluate the Safety, Performance and Intraluminal Crossing of the TruePath™ CTO Device Versus The Crosser System in Patients With Symptomatic Femoro-popliteal Chronic Total Occlusion (CTO)

This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, single-blind study enrolling up to 75 subjects at up to 5 sites in the US. Eligible subjects with symptomatic femoro-popliteal CTO will be randomized 2:1 to treatment with the TruePath™ CTO Device (Intervention) or the CROSSER™ CTO device (Control). All patients will receive standard anticoagulation per hospital protocol and antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The primary objective of the study is to compare the technical success and in-hospital safety of TruePath device with that of the CROSSER device in patients with symptomatic femoro-popliteal CTO. Subjects will be followed clinically while in the hospital and at 1 month following the index procedure. All subjects will undergo procedural intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) imaging. The study population will consist of up to 75 patients with symptomatic femoro-popliteal CTO and indications for revascularization. Subjects must have a previously documented conventional percutaneous procedure or a concurrent failed attempt to cross the CTO using conventional guidewire techniques. All subjects must meet all inclusion and no exclusion criteria and sign an Informed Consent Form approved by the local Institutional Review Board (IRB) prior to enrollment and randomization.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

8

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Connecticut
      • New Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06510
        • Yale Cardiovascular Research Group

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 100 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical Inclusion Criteria
  • Male or non-pregnant female ≥18 years of age;
  • Rutherford Clinical Category 2-5
  • Patients is willing to provide informed consent and comply with the required follow-up visits, testing schedule, and medication regimen
  • Angiographic Lesion Inclusion Criteria
  • Length ≤35 cm
  • The lesion is a single lesion or composite of multiple lesions within the 35 cm segment
  • 100% stenosis by visual estimate
  • Previously documented conventional percutaneous procedure or a concurrent failed attempt to cross the CTO using conventional guidewire techniques
  • Ability to visualize target artery distal to the lesion (via collateral circulation)
  • Target lesion located in the superficial femoral/proximal popliteal arteries, with lesion location starting ≥1cm below the common femoral bifurcation
  • De novo lesion or restenotic lesion >30 days from any prior endovascular intervention
  • Target vessel diameter ≥4 and ≤7 mm and able to be treated with PTA and or a stent
  • A patent inflow artery free from significant lesions (≥50% stenosis) as confirmed by angiography. Treatment of the target lesion may be performed after successful treatment of existing inflow artery lesions at the time of the index procedure. [NOTE: Successful inflow artery treatment is defined as attainment of residual diameter stenosis ≤50% without death or major vascular complication.]
  • At least one patent outflow artery free from significant lesion (≥50% stenosis) as confirmed by angiography (treatment of outflow disease is permitted)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant or nursing subjects and those who plan pregnancy in the period up to 3 months following index procedure. Female subjects of child-bearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test done prior to the index procedure.
  • Rutherford Class 0, 1 or 6
  • History of hemorrhagic stroke within 3 months
  • Renal failure or chronic kidney disease with MDRD GFR ≤ 30 ml/min per 1.73m2 (or serum creatinine ≥2.5 mg/L within 30 days of index procedure or treated with dialysis)
  • Previous or planned surgical or interventional procedure to the target limb within 2 weeks before (aside from conventional percutaneous procedure during the current hospitalization) or within 30 days after the index procedure
  • Prior vascular surgery of the index limb, with the exception of common femoral patch angioplasty remote from the target lesion
  • Planned use of adjunctive primary treatment modalities (e.g., laser, atherectomy, cryoplasty, scoring/cutting balloon, or other)
  • Inability to take required study medications or an allergy to contrast that cannot be controlled with medication
  • Life expectancy of <1 years
  • Patient is currently participating in an investigational drug or device study or previously enrolled in this study Subject enrollment and treatment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: TruePath CTO Device
The TruePath™ CTO Device (Boston Scientific Corporation, Natick, MA) is a new solution for intraluminal treatment of chronic total occlusions (CTO). It is the longest available crossing device (165 cm), and has a diamond-coated distal tip that can rotate at 13,000 rpm. Its profile is similar to a 0.018" guidewire, and includes a shapeable distal tip allowing 1:1 torque response. In addition, it provides audio and visual navigation during CTO crossing.
The TruePath CTO Device is composed of a 0.018" guidewire and a motor housing with a connector cable along with a sterile, disposable battery-powered Control Unit for manipulation of the device during operation. The TruePath CTO Device is indicated to facilitate the intra-luminal placement of conventional guidewires beyond peripheral artery chronic total occlusions.
Active Comparator: CROSSER CTO Device
The CrosserTM CTO Recanalization Catheter ("Crosser system") (Bard Peripheral Vascular Inc. Tempe, AZ, USA), which serves as a control in this investigation, gained U.S. FDA approval for peripheral indications in 2011. The device is similar in both design and indications to the TruePath device, with the exception that the Crosser system uses vibrational angioplasty to achieve CTO crossing.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Technical Success
Time Frame: Day of operation
Technical success, defined as the ability to facilitate complete intraluminal crossing of a CTO into the true distal lumen with a TruePath or a CROSSER device and/or any subsequent conventional guidewire, as confirmed by IVUS imaging
Day of operation
In-hospital Safety
Time Frame: Operation through 30 day follow up
In-hospital safety, defined as a composite of all-cause death, index limb amputation above the ankle, and target lesion revascularization (TLR)
Operation through 30 day follow up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Procedural Success
Time Frame: Day of operation
Procedural success, defined as technical success and (1) residual stenosis <50% in the treated segment (2) and improved distal flow by angiography following the procedure
Day of operation
Clinical Success
Time Frame: Day of operation
Clinical Success defined as procedure success in the absence of in-hospital all-cause death, index limb amputation above the ankle, and TLR.
Day of operation
Symptomatic Improvement
Time Frame: Baseline, and 30 days post operation
Symptomatic improvement, as assessed by change in Rutherford Class from baseline to 30 days
Baseline, and 30 days post operation
Walking Capacity
Time Frame: Baseline and 30 days post operation
Change in walking capacity from baseline to 30 days, measured by the Walking Impairment Questionnaire. The questionaire is a subjective measure of patient-perceived walking performance developed for individuals with peripheral arterial disease. Used to evaluate the "change in walking capacity" study endpoint.
Baseline and 30 days post operation
Index Limb Amputation
Time Frame: Day of Operation through 30 days post operation
Need for limb amputation
Day of Operation through 30 days post operation
Target Lesion Revascularization
Time Frame: 30 days post operation
Describes the percentage of patients that had stented lesions that had to be re-treated due to clinically-driven restenosis.
30 days post operation
Ankle-brachial Index (ABI)
Time Frame: baseline to 30 days post operation
The ratio of systolic blood pressure at the ankle to systolic blood pressure in the arm
baseline to 30 days post operation
Target Vessel Revascularization
Time Frame: 30 days post operation
A repeat revascularization procedure (percutaneous or surgical) of the index procedure target vessel. TVR is classified as clinically-driven if the repeat intervention is driven by clinical findings (ischemic symptoms).
30 days post operation
Angiographic Perforation Classification and Rate
Time Frame: Day of operation

Evaluated in-hospital. The occurrence of any extravasation of contrast during the procedure (detected by the physician performing the procedure, or preferentially the Angiographic Core Laboratory) will be tabulated according to the standard Type 1-3 classification. Type 1 - Extraluminal crater without contrast extravasation

  • Type 2 - Perivascular blush without contrast jet extravasation
  • Type 3 - Contrast jet extravasation through frank (≥1 mm) perforation
Day of operation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Carlos Mena, MD, Yale School of Medicine
  • Principal Investigator: Alexandra Lansky, MD, Yale School of Medicine

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 19, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 19, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

May 22, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

November 4, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 15, 2016

Last Verified

September 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HIC140101333

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Symptomatic Femoro-popliteal Chronic Total Occlusion

Clinical Trials on TruePath CTO Device

3
Subscribe