A Study of Abicipar Pegol in Japanese Patients With Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration

March 14, 2017 updated by: Allergan
This is a safety and efficacy study of abicipar pegol in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration to establish comparability between Japanese and non-Japanese.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

25

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Chiyoda-ku,Tokyo, Japan, 101-8309
        • Nihon University Hospital
      • Fukushima-shi, Japan, 960-1295
        • 1 Fukushima Medical University
      • Kita-ku, Fukuoka-shi Fukuoka, Japan, 812-8582
        • Kyushu University Hospital
      • Kita-ku, Okayama-shi Okayama, Japan, 700-8558
        • Okayama University Hospital
      • Otsu-shi, Japan, 520-2192
        • Shiga University
      • Shinjuku-ku, Japan, 162-8666
        • Tokyo Women's Medical University
      • Showa-ku, Nagoya-shi Aichi, Japan, 466-8560
        • Nagoya University Hospital
      • Taito Ku Tokyo, Japan, 111-0051
        • Takeuchi eye clinic
      • Tennoji-ku Osaka, Japan, 543-0027
        • Musashi Dream Clinic
      • Urayasu-shi, Japan, 279-0021
        • Juntendo University Urayas
      • Yamato Kanagawa, Japan, 242-0001
        • Otakeganka Tsukimino Clinic

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Ethnically Japanese
  • Diagnosis of wet age-related macular degeneration in at least 1 eye
  • Best corrected visual acuity of 20/32 to 20/320 in the study eye and 20/200 or better in the fellow eye

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Hypersensitivity, allergy, or anaphylactic reaction to iodine or shellfish
  • Cataract or refractive surgery within the last 3 months
  • History of vitrectomy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: abicipar pegol 2 mg
Abicipar pegol 2 mg administered to the study eye by intravitreal injection at day 1, weeks 4 and 8, followed by a sham procedure at weeks 12 and 16.
Abicipar pegol administered to the study eye by intravitreal injection at day 1, weeks 4 and 8.
Sham procedure to the study eye at weeks 12 and 16.
Experimental: abicipar pegol 1 mg
Abicipar pegol 1 mg administered to the study eye by intravitreal injection at day 1, weeks 4 and 8, followed by a sham procedure at weeks 12 and 16.
Abicipar pegol administered to the study eye by intravitreal injection at day 1, weeks 4 and 8.
Sham procedure to the study eye at weeks 12 and 16.
Active Comparator: ranibizumab 0.5 mg
Ranibizumab (Lucentis®) 0.5 mg administered to the study eye by intravitreal injection every 4 weeks from day 1 through week 16.
Ranibizumab (Lucentis®) 0.5 mg administered to the study eye by intravitreal injection every 4 weeks from day 1 through week 16.
Other Names:
  • Lucentis®

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in the Study Eye
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 16
BCVA is measured using an eye chart and is reported as the number of letters read correctly (ranging from 0 to 100 letters) in the study eye. The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). An increase (positive number change from baseline) in the number of letters read correctly means that vision has improved and a decrease (negative number change from baseline) in the number of letters read correctly means that vision has worsened.
Baseline, Week 16

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 20
BCVA is measured using an eye chart and is reported as the number of letters read correctly (ranging from 0 to 100 letters) in the study eye. The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). An increase (positive number change from baseline) in the number of letters read correctly means that vision has improved and a decrease (negative number change from baseline) in the number of letters read correctly means that vision has worsened.
Baseline, Week 20
Percentage of Patients With a BCVA Gain of ≥15 Letters in the Study Eye on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, 20 Weeks
BCVA is measured using an eye chart and is reported as the number of letters read correctly using the ETDRS Scale (ranging from 0 to 100 letters) in the study eye. The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). An increase in the number of letters read correctly means that vision has improved. The percentage of patients with a BCVA gain of ≥15 letters are noted.
Baseline, 20 Weeks
Percentage of Patients With a BCVA Gain of ≥10 Letters in the Study Eye on the ETDRS Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, 20 Weeks
BCVA is measured using an eye chart and is reported as the number of letters read correctly using the ETDRS Scale (ranging from 0 to 100 letters) in the study eye. The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). An increase in the number of letters read correctly means that vision has improved. The percentage of patients with a BCVA gain of ≥10 letters are noted.
Baseline, 20 Weeks
Change From Baseline in Central Retinal Thickness (CRT) in the Study Eye
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 16, Week 20
CRT is assessed using spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), a non-invasive diagnostic system that provides high-resolution imaging sections of the retina. SD-OCT is performed in the study eye after pupil dilation. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement and a positive change from baseline indicates worsening.
Baseline, Week 16, Week 20

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 2, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 2, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

July 4, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 25, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 14, 2017

Last Verified

March 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Macular Degeneration

Clinical Trials on abicipar pegol

3
Subscribe