Comparing Two Devices of Uterine Manipulation and Vaginal Fornix Delineation at Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy

February 20, 2019 updated by: Unity Health Toronto
We hypothesize, that the use of the Hohl manipulator® at total laparoscopic hysterectomy reduces operative time (from skin incision to detachment of the uterus) and lateral termal damage of the vaginal wall during colpotomy due to the following reasons: (1) Uterine manipulation is better with the Hohl manipulator®, thereby facilitating dissection during all aspects of the surgery, (2) more tension can be applied on the vagina during colpotomy, thereby hastening electrosurgical transection, reducing activation time and reduce lateral thermal damage and (3) tension on the vagina can be applied until the colpotomy is finished, due to the tight connection between the Hohl manipulator® and the cervix of the uterus, which also affects speed of transection, electrosurgical device activation time and lateral thermal damage.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

91

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5B 1W8
        • St. Michael´s Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 78 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All women aged over 18 years, scheduled for a laparoscopic hysterectomy for a benign disorder will be asked to participate and included after written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pregnancy
  • malignancy
  • if uterine size exceeds 20 weeks of gestation
  • or if the uterus could be removed by a vaginal approach

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Hohl uterine manipulator ®
Total laparoscopic hysterectomy is performed using the Hohl uterine manipulator ®
Active Comparator: Colpo-Probe™ Vaginal Fornix Delineator
Total laparoscopic hysterectomy is performed using the Colpo-Probe™ Vaginal Fornix Delineator

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Detachment of the uterus
Time Frame: 45 minutes to 3 hours
Operative time from skin incision to detachment of uterus. Times are routinely collected by operating room nursing staff.
45 minutes to 3 hours
Thermal Damage
Time Frame: 2 weeks post surgery
Lateral thermal damage to the vagina will be measured on the specimen (in mm) at the time of pathologic evaluation.
2 weeks post surgery
Colpotomy
Time Frame: 3 minutes to 20 minutes
Time from first monopolar energy activation to completion of colpotomy. Operative times are routinely collected by operating room nursing staff.
3 minutes to 20 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Blood Loss
Time Frame: 45 minutes to 3 hours
Total amount of blood lost throughout surgery. Measured in cc.
45 minutes to 3 hours
Pain
Time Frame: 24h post surgery
Amount of post operative pain measured using a pain sensitivity scale.
24h post surgery
Manipulator Installment
Time Frame: intraoperative
intraoperative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Guylaine Lefebvre, MD, Unity Health Toronto

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 23, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 22, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

July 23, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 22, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 20, 2019

Last Verified

February 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Benign Conditions

3
Subscribe