Imaging Pain Relief in Osteoarthritis (IPRO)

Functional Brain Imaging to Understand the Mechanisms of Pain Relief in Knee Osteoarthritis

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a degenerative joint disease and is the most common form of arthritis. Pain reduction and functional recovery are the key elements of the clinical management of OA. Current treatment guidelines recommend a combination of pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments. However, these are not always effective, with nearly 20% of patients not responding to any standard therapy, including joint replacement.

The mechanisms of pain relief are not well understood and are complicated by the remarkably large placebo effect, and inter-individual variation. There is no objective criteria for predicting whether a patient will respond to a given treatment

Duloxetine, an antidepressant drug, has proven effectiveness in various chronic pain syndromes including knee OA. The effect is however limited and only clinically relevant in around half of the trial patients. Importantly, it is currently unclear how and in whom duloxetine alleviates chronic pain.

Advanced MRI techniques use strong magnetic fields and radio frequency signals to generate metabolic, anatomical and functional brain images (fMRI).

Remifentanil is a potent analgesic agent whose analgesic effect has been well characterised in healthy volunteers, including fMRI studies showing modulation of activation of regions in the brain related to pain processing. Nevertheless, the neural correlates of remifentanil effects have not yet been investigated in chronic pain patients.

The aim of this research is to use a combination of multimodal MRI, genetic and psychometric assessments to identify the mechanisms of pain relief in knee OA patients, following treatments with duloxetine and remifentanil, in a placebo controlled condition. With this we also aim to identify genetic, anatomical and brain activity predictors of treatment outcomes.

The main hypotheses are:

• Analgesic response to duloxetine treatment can be predicted using a range of baseline brain imaging markers and QST.
• Analgesic response to duloxetine is mediated by modulation of neural networks underpinning emotional control.
• Duloxetine-induced changes in brain activation differ between responders and non-responders.

This study is expected to last for two years. It is funded by Arthritis Research United Kingdom and forms part of a wider scientific investigation, using translational methodologies, to enhance the understanding of arthritis pain and to improve its treatment.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Osteoarthritis; Chronic Pain
• Intervention / Treatment: Drug: Duloxetine; Drug: Placebo (for Duloxetine); Drug: Remifentanil; Drug: Placebo (for Remifentanil)

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 77
• Phase: Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• United Kingdom
  • Nottinghamshire
    • Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, United Kingdom, NG7 2UH
      • University of Nottingham - School of Medicine - Radiological Sciences

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 35 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Radiographically defined OA knee changes with knee pain
• Must have self-reported knee pain
• Able to give informed consent
• Over 35 years old
• Male or female
• Females not pregnant or lactating and using effective contraception

Exclusion Criteria:

• People with any known contraindication to MRI like

  • Intraocular metallic foreign bodies;
  • Intracranial aneurysm clips;
  • Cardiac pacemakers and defibrillators;
  • Cochlear implants;
• People with a significant head tremor;
• People with potential metal foreign bodies due to previous accidents;
• Breastfeeding or pregnancy, confirmed by pregnancy test;
• People that are felt to be unfit for the MRI scan according to the judgement of medically qualified personnel, either on the research team, or the patient's clinical team. (eg. due to back pain, claustrophobia, acute sickness etc.) This includes patients with signs of impaired temperature regulation such as an extremely high fever;
• Patients with large tattoos, specifically in the head, neck or shoulder region;
• Persons that do not have the capacity to consent;
• Aged less than 35;
• Major medical, neurological and psychiatric co-morbidities;
• Other significant medical condition;
• Metallic agents embedded within the body (ie. Shrapnel, surgical pins);
• Refusal by participant to general practitioner (GP) being informed;
• Have uncontrolled narrow-angle glaucoma;
• Have recently taken monoamine oxidase inhibitor (MAOI) or Mellaril® (thioridazine);
• Taking fluvoxamine, ciprofloxacin or enoxacin;
• Taking St. John's Wort, a herbal treatment (Hypericum perforatum);
• Taking other medicines containing duloxetine;
• Have liver disease or severe kidney disease;
• Currently on antidepressant treatment, including treatment for pain with tricyclic agents such as amitryptiline;
• Have recently taken monoamine oxidase inhibitor (MAOI) or Mellaril® (thioridazine);
• Taking tramadol;
• Known hypersensitivity, allergy or intolerance to one of duloxetine's components;
• Unwillingness to take caution in relation to use of other centrally active substances such as alcohol and sedative drugs;
• Current treatment with potent inhibitors of CYP1A2 like fluvoxamine;

Participants undergoing acute treatment (remifentanil or placebo) have, in addition to the stated above, the following exclusion criteria:

• Taking morphine
• Known hypersensitivity, allergy or intolerance to one of remifentanil's components or other fentanyl - analogues
• Current treatment with cardiac depressant drugs such as beta-blockers and calcium channel blocking agents

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: Quadruple

Number of Arms

4

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Duloxetine; Duloxetine 30 mg a day (2 weeks), then 60 mg a day (4weeks), taken by mouth	Drug: Duloxetine; 54 participants will be allocated for duloxetine treatment; Other Names: Cymbalta
Placebo Comparator: Placebo (for Duloxetine); Sugar pill: 1 capsule a day (2 weeks), then 2 capsules a day (4 weeks) taken by mouth	Drug: Placebo (for Duloxetine); Sugar pill manufactured to mimic Duloxetine 30mg. 27 participants will be allocated to this intervention; Other Names: Sugar pill
Experimental: Remifentanil; Intravenous infusion with maximum estimated plasma target of 1.0 ng/ml, during less than 20 minutes	Drug: Remifentanil; 27 participants will be allocated to Remifentanil infusion; Other Names: Remifentanil hydrochloride
Placebo Comparator: Placebo (for Remifentanil); Intravenous infusion of normal saline, during less than 20 min	Drug: Placebo (for Remifentanil); Placebo comparator to Remifentanil treatment. 27 participants will be allocated to this arm; Other Names: Sodium chloride; Normal saline

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Time Frame
Reduction in nociceptive brain response after duloxetine	Baseline, week six
Neural network change (resting condition) induced by duloxetine	Baseline, week six
Predicting response to duloxetine from baseline fMRI metrics using univariate and multivariate analysis	Baseline, week six
Differences in brain response and network change between responders and non-responders	Baseline, week six

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Time Frame
Identification of QST and questionnaire parameters that predict response to duloxetine	Baseline, week six
Correlation between baseline CPM and TS with brain activity and connectivity changes	Baseline, week six
Group differences in brain activity and structure in pain processing, limbic and modulatory pathways changes following duloxetine treatment in comparison to placebo	Baseline, week six

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Time Frame
Determination of gene variations that can be linked with duloxetine treatment response	Baseline, week six

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: University of Nottingham
• Collaborators: Arthritis Research UK
• Investigators: Principal Investigator: Dorothee P Auer, PhD, University of Nottingham

Publications and helpful links

General Publications

• Reckziegel D, Bailey H, Cottam WJ, Tench CR, Mahajan RP, Walsh DA, Knaggs RD, Auer DP. Imaging pain relief in osteoarthritis (IPRO): protocol of a double-blind randomised controlled mechanistic study assessing pain relief and prediction of duloxetine treatment outcome. BMJ Open. 2017 Jun 26;7(6):e014013. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014013.

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start: December 1, 2014
• Primary Completion (Actual): June 1, 2016
• Study Completion (Actual): June 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: August 4, 2014
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: August 4, 2014
• First Posted (Estimate): August 5, 2014

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): November 27, 2017
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: November 23, 2017
• Last Verified: May 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: Osteoarthritis; Chronic Pain; Pain relief
• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Pain; Neurologic Manifestations; Joint Diseases; Musculoskeletal Diseases; Rheumatic Diseases; Arthritis; Osteoarthritis; Chronic Pain; Physiological Effects of Drugs; Neurotransmitter Agents; Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action; Central Nervous System Depressants; Peripheral Nervous System Agents; Analgesics; Sensory System Agents; Analgesics, Opioid; Narcotics; Psychotropic Drugs; Neurotransmitter Uptake Inhibitors; Membrane Transport Modulators; Antidepressive Agents; Dopamine Agents; Serotonin and Noradrenaline Reuptake Inhibitors; Remifentanil; Duloxetine Hydrochloride
• Other Study ID Numbers: 13124