Hyaluronidase for Trigger Point Injection in Myofascial Pain Syndrome

November 13, 2014 updated by: Ji Won Choi, Samsung Medical Center

Effect of Hyaluronidase Addition to Lidocaine for Trigger Point Injection in Myofascial Pain Syndrome

Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) is the most common cause of persistent regional pain characterized by myofascial trigger points. Trigger point injection (TPI) using local anesthetics is one of the most effective methods for treatment of MPS, and steroids or botulinum toxin can be added to local injections .

Recent study suggested that the hyaluronan (HA) could be the basis of myofascial pain. HA within the deep fascia facilitates the free sliding of two adjacent fibrous fascial layers. If the HA assumes a more packed conformation, or more generally, if the loose connective tissue inside the fascia alters its density, the behavior of the entire deep fascia and the underlying muscle would be compromised.

The investigators anticipated that hyaluronidase could decrease the viscosity of HA near the muscle and fascia of trigger points. Meanwhile, hyaluronidase is thought to promote the spread of local anesthetic solution by hydrolyzing glycosidic bonds within HA. Hyaluronidase was shown to be effective in retro- and peribulbar block for ophthalmologic surgery or reducing tissue edema in dermatology, and adhesiolysis for some interventional pain managements.

However, the effect of the addition of hyaluronidase to local anesthetics during TPI has not been studied. The investigators aimed to compare the efficacy of TPI with the addition of hyaluronidase compared to local anesthetic alone on pain and quality of life in MPS patients.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Study approval was obtained from Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Samsung medical center, and written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

The required sample size was determined by power analysis on the basis of a previous study. The primary outcome was pain intensity in the posterior neck and upper back after TPI using verbal numerical rating scale (VNRS). The standard deviation of VNRS was assumed to be 20. Power calculations indicated that detecting 20 points difference in VNRS between the two groups (with α = 0.05 and β = 0.1) would require a sample of 29 subjects for each group. To account for dropouts, 33 subjects were recruited for each group.

Group L received TPI with a 3.2 ml of a 1:1 mixture of 1% lidocaine and 0.9% normal saline. Group H received TPI with the same volume of solution supplemented with hyaluronidase (H-LASE®, 1500 iu, L&H Pharm., Seoul, Korea) 600 iu/ml. The investigators monitored vital sign and any signs of complications such as bleeding, hematoma, allergic reactions for 30 minutes. Treatment efficacy was evaluated by one of the authors (J.W.C.) using VNRS. To reduce bias, this evaluator and the participants were not informed of the assigned group.

Patients' characteristics such as age, height, weight, BMI and pretreatment neck disability index (NDI) and brief pain inventory (BPI) were analyzed by independent t-test. The sex distribution was analyzed by the chi-square test. P values were corrected by Bonferroni's method. Pretreatment VNRS and the duration of pain were evaluated by the Wilcoxon two-sample test. Repeated measures ANOVA was used to compare changes in the VNRS over time between the two groups. Pre- and post-TPI changes in NDI and BPI were compared between the two groups with the Wilcoxon signed rank test and the independent t-test, respectively. All analyses were performed with SPSS 18.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) statistical software. Significance was assumed for P values of less than 0.05.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

61

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

23 years to 73 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults
  • Aged 25-75 years
  • Diagnosed with myofascial pain syndrome affecting both trapezius muscles

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of allergy to lidocaine or hyaluronidase
  • Anticoagulant medication or antiplatelet agent within 5 days before the study
  • Analgesic medication, including non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, tramadol, acetaminophen, or opioids within 5 days of the study
  • Pain related to trauma within 6 months before the study
  • History of cervical or shoulder surgery
  • TPI within 3 months in the same region
  • Fibromyalgia
  • Cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy
  • Obesity, defined as body mass index of 27.5 or higher
  • Other medical or psychological conditions (cancer, rheumatoid arthritis, endocrine disease, major depression, schizophrenia)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Lidocaine
Group L received trigger point injection with a 3.2 ml of a 1:1 mixture of 1% lidocaine and 0.9% normal saline
Experimental: Hyaluronidase
Group H received trigger point injection with the same volume of solution supplemented with hyaluronidase (H-LASE®, 1500 iu, L&H Pharm., Seoul, Korea) 600 iu/ml

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Degree of pain as measured by the verbal numerical rating scale
Time Frame: within 2 weeks after intervention
within 2 weeks after intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 11, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 13, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

November 18, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

November 18, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 13, 2014

Last Verified

November 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Myofascial Pain Syndrome

Clinical Trials on trigger point injection

3
Subscribe