Study to Evaluate Safety and Effectiveness of Dynamic Stabilization Versus Lumbar Fusion in Treatment of Multilevel Lumbar Disc Degeneration Disease (MLIDH)

September 24, 2015 updated by: Qiang Zhou, MD. PhD.

A Prospective Comparative Study to Evaluate Safety and Effectiveness of Dynamic Stabilization Versus Lumbar Fusion in Treatment of Multilevel Lumbar Disc Degeneration Disease

The purpose of this study is to compare outcomes of (i) surgical treatment with posterior dynamic stabilization and (ii) surgical treatment with internal fixation and fusion in patients with multilevel lumbar degenerative disk disease.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Study aims are:

  1. To evaluate superiority of Surgical treatment with posterior dynamic stabilization compared to Surgical treatment with internal fixation and fusion in lumbar range of motion;
  2. To compare Surgical treatment with posterior dynamic stabilization compared to Surgical treatment with internal fixation and fusion in functional outcomes as measured by change in Oswestry Disability Index;
  3. To compare radiological, clinical, patient-reported and, safety outcomes between the two surgical approaches.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

102

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Chongqing, China
        • Recruiting
        • Third Military Medical University/Southwest Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Qiang Zhou, MD, PhD
          • Phone Number: 86-13677669899
          • Email: zq_tlh@163.com
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Qiang Zhou, MD, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

30 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients of The Third Medical University/Southwest Hospital with multilevel lumbar degenerative disk disease.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Signed informed consent
  2. Age between 30 and 75 years inclusive
  3. Radiographic evidence of multi-level lumbar disc degeneration disease
  4. Scheduled for 2- or 3-level lumbar discectomy at levels from L1 to S1 with or without dynamic stabilization or fusion
  5. Preoperative ODI ≥ 30%
  6. Clinical symptoms consistent with diagnosis of lumbar DDD:

    • Radicular back or lower extremity pain and/or
    • Decreased muscular strength and/or
    • Abnormal sensation
  7. Failed to gain adequate symptom relief from at least one month of adequate non-operative treatment

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Cauda equina syndrome
  2. Patients with other lumbar conditions that will, in the opinion of the investigator, interfere with clinical outcomes (e.g. spinal structural deformities, spinal fractures, ankylosing spondylitis, spinal tuberculosis, spinal infection, spinal tumors, symptomatic cervical spinal disease)
  3. Osteoporosis defined as T-score ≤ -3.5. BMD will be measured by DEXA performed on lumbar spine
  4. Systemic infection such as AIDS and active hepatitis
  5. Recent history (less than 3 years) of chemical substance dependency or significant psychosocial disturbance, which may impact the outcome or study participation
  6. Participation in a clinical trial of investigational drug or device within the past 30 days

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Posterior Dynamic Stabilization
Surgical treatment with posterior dynamic stabilization
Internal Fixation and Fusion
Surgical treatment with internal fixation and fusion

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Range of Motion in Lumbar Spine
Time Frame: 24 Months
24 Months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change in Oswestry Disability Index
Time Frame: 24 Months
24 Months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Numeric Rating Scale for Back Pain
Time Frame: 24 Months
24 Months
Numeric Rating Scale for Leg Pain
Time Frame: 24 Months
24 Months
Range of Motion in Sagittal Plane at Each Operated Level
Time Frame: 24 Months
24 Months
Radiographic Evaluations by Woodend Classification and Modic Changes on MRI
Time Frame: 24 Months
24 Months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Qiang Zhou, MD, PhD, Third Military Medical University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

August 1, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

August 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 26, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 5, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

March 11, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

September 28, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 24, 2015

Last Verified

September 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lumbar Spine Disc Degeneration

Clinical Trials on Posterior Dynamic Stabilization

3
Subscribe