Monocentric Trial: Stem Cell Emergency Life Threatening Limbs Arteriopathy (SCELTA) (SCELTA)

May 8, 2017 updated by: Enrico Maggi, University of Florence

Monocentric Randomized Study for the Therapy of Critic Limb Ischemia With Bone Marrow- or Peripheral Blood-derived Stem Cells

The investigators designed a randomized clinical trial (stem cell emergency life threatening arteriopathy or SCELTA) to compare the therapeutic efficacy of the auto-transplant of enriched circulating EPCs (ECEPCs) with auto-transplant of BM-MNCs. ECEPCs, obtained by immunoselection of CD14+ and CD34+ cells, or BM-MNCs, were injected intramuscularly in the affected limb of patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Peripheral arterial disease comprises a clinical spectrum that extends from no symptoms to presentation with critical limb ischemia (CLI), which is a very invalidating condition characterized by rest pain, march inability, trophic lesions and unavoidable progression to major amputations, which are burdened by a high mortality in the first year. The pathophysiology of CLI often associates with a defect in the development of collateral vessels and angiogenesis, a process which refers to the formation of new blood vessels into tissue, due to circulating endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) and vascular progenitor cells. In the last few years, significant improvement of this condition has been reported following bone marrow (BM) autotransplant or autotransplant of peripheral EPCs mobilized from BM through the injection of granulocyte-colony stimulatory factor (G-CSF). In a previous study, the investigators found that individually variable proportions of circulating CD14+ cells expressed low levels of CD34 (CD14+CD34low) and revealed the functional phenotype of EPCs. The investigators therefore designed a monocentric randomized clinical trial to compare the therapeutic efficacy of BM autotransplant with the autotransplant of a population of circulating CD34+ and CD14+CD34low enriched by a closed sterile immunomagnetic system (enriched circulating EPCs or ECEPCs), without a previous EPC mobilization from BM.

Patients will be evaluated for clinical parameters and ABI, TBI, TCp02 before autotransplant and at three follow-up times after the autotransplant (4, 24 and 52 weeks); also angio-TAC of legs, capillaroscopy, and photoplethysmography will be evaluated at 4, and even at 52 weeks.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

45

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Tuscany
      • Florence, Tuscany, Italy, 50134
        • Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Eligible patients were men and women aged more than 40 years with a diagnosis of CLI due to atherosclerosis of the lower extremities, as defined by the presence of persistent rest pain requiring systemic and continued analgesic treatment in the last 15 days and/or the presence of trophic lesions imputable to the occluding arteriopathy, an ankle-brachial Index (ABI) < 0.40 (with systolic ankle pressure < 50-70 Hg mm), a toe/brachial index (TBI) < 0.40 (with big toe systolic pressure < 30-50 Hg mm), and a transcutaneous oxygen pressure (TC pO2) < 30 Hg mm.
  • The patient was considered as eligible for the treatment and enrolled only after the demonstration that intravascular or surgical re-vascularization was not possible, as revealed by ecography and angio-CAT, or when the patient refused to undergo surgical treatments and after having obtained his/her written informed consensus.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Exclusion criteria were: age < 40;
  • not atherosclerotic CLI,
  • myocardial infarction occurrence in the 6 months;
  • cardiac failure of III-IV class NYHA;
  • ejection fraction lower than 40%;
  • arterial hypertension (>160/100 Hg mm) uncontrolled despite the usage of two anti-hypertensive drugs;
  • presence of current or chronic severe infectious diseases;
  • osteomyelitis;
  • diabetes with glycate hemoglobin > 7.5;
  • proliferative diabetic retinopathy;
  • hemorrhagic disorders;
  • non-atherosclerotic arteriopathy;
  • chronic airway insufficiency (p02 <65 Hg mm, pCO2 > 0.50 Hg mm);
  • renal failure (creatinine > 2mg/dl);
  • contraindications or intolerance to contrast media for radiologic imaging

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: peripheral blood EPC injection
intramuscular injection of circulating EPC at leg level
Active Comparator: bone marrow MNC injection
intramuscular injection of BM MNC at leg level

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safety as measured by evaluation of any adverse event temporary correlated with the treatment
Time Frame: 52 weeks of follow-up
Evaluation of any adverse event temporary correlated with the treatment
52 weeks of follow-up
Changes in ischemic leg perfusion from baseline
Time Frame: 4, 22, 52 weeks of follow-up
Improvement of leg perfusion as assessed by values of Time to Pick (TTP) evaluated by ultrasound tools
4, 22, 52 weeks of follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Improvement of Mean values of the transcutaneous partial oxygen pressure (TCP02)
Time Frame: 4, 22, 52 weeks of follow-up
Improvement of mean values of the transcutaneous partial oxygen pressure of at least 20%
4, 22, 52 weeks of follow-up
Improvement of mean values of ankle brachial pressure index (ABI)
Time Frame: 4, 22, 52 weeks of follow-up
improvement (at least 25% increase) of Mean values of ankle brachial pressure index
4, 22, 52 weeks of follow-up
Improvement of vessel anatomical status
Time Frame: 4, 22, 52 weeks of follow-up
Improvement of leg vascularization as assessed by color Doppler ultrasound
4, 22, 52 weeks of follow-up
Improvement of leg perfusion
Time Frame: 4, 22, 52 weeks of follow-up
Improvement of leg perfusion as assessed by plethysmography characterization
4, 22, 52 weeks of follow-up
Improvement of vessel anatomical status
Time Frame: 4, 22, 52 weeks of follow-up
Improvement of leg vascularization as assessed by Angio-CT, defined as presence of new vessels
4, 22, 52 weeks of follow-up
Quality of life Improvement
Time Frame: -28, 0, 28 weeks of follow-up
Quality of life, as assessed by the disease-specific ST22 and SF36 questionaries
-28, 0, 28 weeks of follow-up
improvement of rest pain
Time Frame: 4, 22, 52 weeks of follow-up
Rest pain as evaluated by visual analogue pain scale (VAS)
4, 22, 52 weeks of follow-up
Improvement of trophic limb lesions
Time Frame: 4, 22, 52 weeks of follow-up
Mean score of trophic limb lesions, as evaluated according to Wagner international grade
4, 22, 52 weeks of follow-up
Reduction of numbers of major amputation (amputation free survival )
Time Frame: 4, 22, 52 weeks of follow-up
Reduction of numbers of major amputation compared with untreated patients
4, 22, 52 weeks of follow-up
improvement of microvascular anatomy
Time Frame: 4, 22, 52 weeks of follow-up
evaluation of microvascular anatomy as assessed by capillaroscopy
4, 22, 52 weeks of follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Enrico Maggi, professor, University of Florence

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 19, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 26, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

May 27, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 9, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 8, 2017

Last Verified

May 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • UFlorence

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Critical Limb Ischemia

Clinical Trials on Transplantation of circulating CD14+CD34+cells

3
Subscribe