An Evaluation of the Efficacy of Oral-B New Product Sensi-Stop on Dentinal Hypersensitivity (SSDH)

September 21, 2017 updated by: University of Minnesota
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of Sensi-StopTM strips (Procter & Gamble™) on the relief of dentinal hypersensitivity. In other words, do Sensi-StopTM strips (Procter & Gamble™) reduce or eliminate cold sensitivity in teeth? In addition, the investigators will evaluate whether there is a difference in the Sensi-StopTM strip (Procter & Gamble™) effectiveness when the product is placed by a dental professional compared to self-placement by the person with sensitive teeth. This product is not experimental.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

There are two groups in this research study: 1) The Self Applied group, and 2) the Professionally Applied group.

Once it is determined that interested individuals qualify to participate in the study and have determined that they want to participate, the group that participants are in will be determined. The study has been designed to ensure that 66% of the study participants receives strips that contain the active ingredient and 33% of the subjects receive strips without the active ingredient. This means that there is a 1 out of 3 chance that participants will be assigned to receive the strip(s) without the active desensitizing ingredient. At the end of your 8-week participation, if it turns out that participants received the strips without the active ingredient, they will be offered a sample pack with two strips that contain the active desensitizing ingredient for them to use at home.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Minnesota
      • Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55455
        • Oral Health Research Clinic at the School of Dentistry at the University of Minnesota

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient presents in good general health with no allergies to commercial dental products and are currently not using any desensitizing agents.
  • If participants are using desensitizing agent the participant must agree to not use any desensitizing agents in the 4 weeks leading up to the baseline data collection appointment and during the following 8 week length of the study.
  • Patients with a history of having used Sensi-Stop Strips (Procter & Gamble™) in the past will not be eligible to participate because it will not be possible to maintain blindness to the treatment that they receive.
  • Patients will also have at least the following baseline measurements:

    i. Schiff Air Scale = equal to or greater than 1

ii. Verbal Rating Scale = equal to or greater than 1

iii. Recession= 1mm or greater

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any dental pathology resulting in pain that could confound the study findings would render the patient ineligible: e.g. advanced dental decay, pulpitis, fractured teeth, fractured restorations, chipped teeth, cracked teeth, severe gingival inflammation, post-restorative sensitivity, marginal leakage, severe periodontal disease, as characterized by purulent exudate, generalized mobility, and/or severe recession.
  • Also, if potential study subjects are not willing to agree to avoid the use of desensitizing and/or whitening products they will not be enrolled.
  • Adults lacking in the ability to give consent will also be excluded.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Prof applied oxalate
Subjects will be randomized to either receive the Prof applied oxalate Crest Sensi-Stop strip (Procter & Gamble™). The oxalate strip contains 3% dipotassium oxalate desensitizing gel. The placebo strip is blank. The strips will be placed by a licensed dental professional and will be in place for 10 minutes. Subjects will be instructed to not rinse their mouth, drink, eat or brush their teeth for 30 minutes after completion of the treatment.
Crest Sensi-Stop strips (Procter & Gamble™) with the active ingredient will be placed on the qualifying teeth by a dental professional.
Active Comparator: Self-applied oxalate
Participants randomized to the Active Comparator Group will have the following intervention: Intervention: self-applied oxalate (Crest Sensi-Stop strip Procter & Gamble™), which contains 3% dipotassium oxalate desensitizing gel. The strip will be placed by the participant, following the manufacturer's directions. The strip will be left in place for 10 minutes. Subjects will be instructed to not rinse their mouth, drink, eat or brush their teeth for 30 minutes after completion of the treatment.
Subjects will apply the strips (Procter & Gamble™), that contain the active ingredient, by themselves following the manufacturer's instructions.
Sham Comparator: Prof applied placebo
Subjects will be randomized to either receive the Prof applied placebo Crest Sensi-Stop strip (Procter & Gamble™). The oxalate strip contains 3% dipotassium oxalate desensitizing gel. The placebo strip is blank (sham). The strips will be placed by a licensed dental professional and will be in place for 10 minutes. Subjects will be instructed to not rinse their mouth, drink, eat or brush their teeth for 30 minutes after completion of the treatment.
Crest Sensi-Stop strips (Procter & Gamble™) without the active ingredient will be placed on the qualifying teeth by a dental professional.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Schiff Air Test: Mean Reduction in Sensitivity Between Groups
Time Frame: 30 Minutes Post, 4 Weeks Post, 8 Weeks Post Baseline

An analysis of covariance model was used to compare mean reduction in sensitivity scores (SAS and VRS) between groups at each post-treatment time point. A linear mixed effect model with group, time and baseline score as fixed effects and a random subject effect was used to compare the sensitivity outcomes between groups across time. The effect of location was also examined using this model.

Schiff Air Scale 0-3 Measurement of Dentinal Hypersensitivity

0 Tooth/Patient did not respond to the air stimulus

  1. Tooth/Patient responded to the air stimulus but did not request discontinuation of the stimulus
  2. Tooth/Patient responded to the air stimulus and request discontinuation or moved from the stimulus
  3. Tooth/Patient responded to the air stimulus, considered the stimulus painful, and requested discontinuation of the stimulus
30 Minutes Post, 4 Weeks Post, 8 Weeks Post Baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Verbal Rating Scale: Mean Reduction in Sensitivity Between Groups
Time Frame: 30 Minutes Post, 4 Weeks Post, 8 Weeks Post Baseline

An analysis of covariance model was used to compare mean reduction in sensitivity scores (SAS and VRS) between groups at each post-treatment time point. A linear mixed effect model with group, time and baseline score as fixed effects and a random subject effect was used to compare the sensitivity outcomes between groups across time. The effect of location was also examined using this model.

Verbal Rating Scale 0-10 Measurement of Participant's Perception of Pain

0 = No pain 1-3 = Mild Pain 4-6 = Moderate Pain 7-10 = Severe Pain

30 Minutes Post, 4 Weeks Post, 8 Weeks Post Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Patricia A. Lenton, MA, CCRP, University of Minnesota

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 27, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 18, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

June 19, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 23, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 21, 2017

Last Verified

September 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 1503M65361

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

At this time, we do not plan to share individual participant data. We are willing to share compiled data.

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Tooth Sensitivity

Clinical Trials on Prof applied oxalate

3
Subscribe