Single Test to ARrive at MS Diagnosis. Using a Single MRI Brain Scan to Help Diagnose Multiple Sclerosis (STAR-MS)

December 1, 2015 updated by: University of Nottingham

Single Test to ARrive at MS Diagnosis. A Prospective, Longitudinal, Investigator Blinded, Pilot Study Assessing the Accuracy of a Single 3 Tesla MRI Scan in Predicting Multiple Sclerosis in Cases of Diagnostic Uncertainty

This is a pilot study (a small scale study testing procedures so that the investigators can apply this to a larger scale study). This study will test the accuracy of a new brain scan (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) technique in predicting the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS) in patients where there is uncertainty about the diagnosis. For patients where there is a suspicion (but not definite) diagnosis of MS, an additional MRI brain scan will be offered. There will be no other research tests and the patient is followed up to see what the eventual diagnosis is. The investigators will then review the original brain scan to see if this predicted the diagnosis of MS or not.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Detailed Description

There is no single, simple test to differentiate MS from conditions that mimic it. Apart from the patient's symptoms, doctors use Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the brain to see if there are abnormalities which are consistent with MS. In patients without typical symptoms or a typical MRI appearance, a firm diagnosis cannot be made as other neurological illnesses can mimic symptoms of MS and the MRI scans can look very similar. Further tests are often required such as lumbar punctures, resulting in delays, discomfort for the patient and additional healthcare costs. With time the diagnosis can become clearer as patients may develop other symptoms of MS but this may take months or years.

The most common errors are from misinterpretation of the brain abnormalities or 'lesions' seen on the MRI scan. Subsequently if a patient is misdiagnosed with MS they may receive treatment they do not need. Furthermore a delay in a firm diagnosis delays treatment for another condition. With the rapid increase of new medications in the last few years, accurate and rapid diagnosis is paramount.

Pathologically (when looking at lesions using a microscope) MS lesions usually have a vein running through the centre, whereas in lesions arising from other conditions, the investigators hypothesize that no central vein is seen. The investigators can therefore distinguish between patients with MS and patients without it.

The researchers therefore want to test the value of a clinical 3-Tesla MRI brain scan in accurately distinguishing between MS and other conditions, with MRI sequences that have been refined over the last few years.

Patients will only have one research MRI brain scan and then be followed up by their neurologist, who will confirm the final diagnosis. The investigators shall then look back at the original scans to see if those with MS had veins within their lesions and if those without MS had lesions without veins

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

60

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Nottinghamshire
      • Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, United Kingdom, NG7 2UH
        • Clinical Neurology, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Nottingham, UK

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

The investigators will recruit patients who attend the general neurology and MS clinics at Nottingham University Hospitals (NUH) NHS Trust, UK. The researchers anticipate that the study population will comprise of two groups: the common presentation of young individuals following the first neurological symptoms suggestive of MS, however the neuroradiologist's report of the MRI will not be in agreement with the neurological impression; and a group of patients who present with atypical symptoms for MS but the MRI scan is reported as suggestive of MS.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Able to tolerate an MRI brain scan
  • No contraindications to MRI
  • Radiological suspicion of MS, but clinically atypical or Clinical suspicion of MS, but radiologically atypical
  • Radiological or clinical suspicion of any of the following with a routine MRI brain scan showing white matter lesions; Autoimmune/Inflammatory; Antiphospholipid syndrome, Neurosarcoidosis, Neuro-Behcet's disease, Neuromyelitis Optica, Systemic lupus erythematosus, Primary CNS vasculitis, Secondary CNS vasculitis, Sjogren's syndrome, Susac syndrome. Ischaemic; Hypertensive ischaemic disease (small vessel disease), embolic disease. Infective ; Lyme disease, Cytomegalovirus CNS infection, Toxocariasis, Neurocysticercosis, Whipple's disease, Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy, Herpes virus (HHV) infection e.g VZV, HIV, Toxoplasmosis, Tuberculosis, Neurosyphilis. Neoplastic; Lymphoma, Glioma, Primary CNS Lymphoma, Cerebral metastases. Other; CADASIL, Histiocytosis, Migraine, Mitochondrial disease, Leukodystrophy.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to tolerate a further MRI scan
  • Unsafe to perform an MRI scan
  • Pregnancy
  • Participants with normal routine clinical scans
  • Unable to give written informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difference in the proportion of central veins:lesions in patients with MS and non-MS.
Time Frame: After 1 year of follow up with a confirmed diagnosis.
To detect this difference with an alpha of 0.05 and power of 0.8, (based on previous data that shows a mean proportion of approx. 60% in MS patients and 6% in ischaemic patients) we will need 12 patients with MS and 12 with non-MS at 1 year of follow up. However given the fact that approx. 40% of patients will have a diagnosis of MS at 1 year, we will need to scan 60 patients in total.
After 1 year of follow up with a confirmed diagnosis.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sensitivity of using a proportion of central veins:lesions in diagnosing MS.
Time Frame: After 1 year of follow up with a confirmed diagnosis
After 1 year of follow up with a confirmed diagnosis
Specificity of using a proportion of central veins:lesions in diagnosing MS.
Time Frame: After 1 year of follow up with a confirmed diagnosis
After 1 year of follow up with a confirmed diagnosis
Positive predictive value of the central vein:lesion MRI test.
Time Frame: After 1 year of follow up with a confirmed diagnosis
After 1 year of follow up with a confirmed diagnosis
Negative predictive value of the central vein:lesion MRI test.
Time Frame: After 1 year of follow up with a confirmed diagnosis
After 1 year of follow up with a confirmed diagnosis
Optimal proportion of central veins:lesions to make a diagnosis of MS.
Time Frame: After 1 year of follow up with a confirmed diagnosis.
Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves will be used.
After 1 year of follow up with a confirmed diagnosis.
Rate of patient recruitment.
Time Frame: After 1 year
After 1 year
Cohen's kappa inter-rater agreement for the diagnosis of MS using the MRI test.
Time Frame: After 1 year of follow up.
Can different observers calculate the same proportion of central veins:lesions on each scan.
After 1 year of follow up.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Dr Nikos Evangelou, MD, Clinical Neurology, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Nottingham, UK

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2016

Study Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 23, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 25, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

June 30, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 2, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 1, 2015

Last Verified

December 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 15022 [Sponsor reference]
  • 15/NW/0286 (Other Identifier: NRES Committee North West - Greater Manchester East)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Multiple Sclerosis

3
Subscribe